Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The preparation of the implant site has a major influence on the success rate and long-term survival of dental implants. Piezoelectric devices and special implant drilling inserts are now emerging to replace conventional drills.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation

NCT03357406

Bone Atrophy, Alveolar

COMPLETED NA

Septal Bone Expansion Using Osseodensification Versus Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation

NCT06957860

Dental Implant Osseodensification

COMPLETED NA

Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone

NCT07082634

Socket Shield Technique Maxillary Esthetic Zone

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement

NCT07077915

Immediate Dental Implant Placement Conventional Drilling Technique Osseodensification Drilling Technique

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA

Clinical Evaluation of Implant-secured Removable Partial Denture

NCT02762201

Tooth Loss

TERMINATED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Osteotomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Split mouth

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piezosurgery assisted osteotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sequential osteotomy drilling was done using mectron piezosurgery implant drilling protocol

Control

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional drilling osteotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bone osteotomy for implant placement was done following the BEGO Semados RS/RSX TrayPlus conventional drilling

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piezosurgery assisted osteotomy

Sequential osteotomy drilling was done using mectron piezosurgery implant drilling protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional drilling osteotomy

bone osteotomy for implant placement was done following the BEGO Semados RS/RSX TrayPlus conventional drilling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with bilateral missing premolars
* Remaining bone height more ≥ 10mm.
* Remaining bone width ≥ 6mm

Exclusion Criteria

* patients that smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day
* Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease.
* Presence of bone pathology within the future osteotomy site

Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No