Computer Guided Versus Freehand Dental Implant Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06204692

Last Updated: 2024-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study's goal is to evaluate the efficacy of traditional rehabilitation with freehand implant implantation of partly or totally edentulous patients utilizing flapless or mini-flap procedures vs. 3D implant design software and specialized surgical templates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with at least 7 mm of height and 4 mm of breadth in their bones, who needed at least two implants to be restored with a single prosthesis, were recruited one after the other. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups in a parallel group trial design. : Group I: consisted of 6 patients where computer guided dental implant placement and Group II: included six people who had dental implants placed manually. A temporary prosthesis was inserted into the implants right away, and four to six months later, a permanent prosthesis took its place.

Implant failures, marginal bone loss, number of therapy sessions, length of treatment, post-surgical pain and swelling, use of painkillers, surgical time, time needed to resolve problems, and patient satisfaction were among the outcome variables evaluated by a blinded, independent assessor. Patients were tracked for a full year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer Guided Dental Implant Surgery.

Computer Guided Dental Implant Surgery

Group Type OTHER

dental implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

consisted of 6 patients where computer guided dental implant placement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dental implant

consisted of 6 patients where computer guided dental implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* totally edentulous in one or both arches,
* with at least 7 mm of height and 4 mm of breadth in their bones as assessed by preoperative CBCT scans.
* patients between the ages of 35 and 65 who could give informed permission,
* Implants next to each other required to be positioned at least 3 mm apart from each other and 1.5 mm apart from the tooth.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have received radiation therapy to the head and neck region within the year prior to implantation,
* those who are receiving intravenous amino bisphosphonates,
* those who have untreated periodontitis,
* those with uncontrolled diabetes,
* pregnant women, or nursing mothers are among the general contraindications to implant surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

October 6 University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nermine Ramadan Mahmoud

Associated Professor, faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

nermine Ramadan Mahmoud

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

October6U

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RECO6U/29-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.