Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Double Versus Triple Scan Protocol in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT ID: NCT03321162
Last Updated: 2017-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
16 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-20
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both protocols C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) indicated in completely edentulous patient and require C.T scan for patient wearing scan appliance .
In C1(double scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , two optical scan for the model with and without scan appliance.
In C2 (triple scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , CT scan for scan appliance alone .
Teeth positions in both protocols were identified by radio-opaque scan appliance .
16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol ( two groups - 8 implants in each group ) to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
double scan protocol
In C1(double scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , two optical scan for the model with and without scan appliance.
No interventions assigned to this group
triple scan protocol
In C2 (triple scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , CT scan for scan appliance alone .
scan protocol
Scanning strategy is based on multiple scans. Essentially one CT scan of the patient (usually with a scan appliance). Another CT scan of the model or scan appliance may be required (double scan technique). Such a second CT scan can be replaced by optical scanning of the model and scan appliance (triple scan technique).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
scan protocol
Scanning strategy is based on multiple scans. Essentially one CT scan of the patient (usually with a scan appliance). Another CT scan of the model or scan appliance may be required (double scan technique). Such a second CT scan can be replaced by optical scanning of the model and scan appliance (triple scan technique).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. patients with Bucco-lingual bone thickness \>6 mm allowing flapless implant placement
3. patients free from any systemic diseases that may affect bone quality e.g diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria
2. patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality.
3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases.
4. Anatomical situations requiring regenerative procedure.
30 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mostafa mohamed el maghraby
principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cebc.cu. cairo university
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id