Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimension Around Immediate Implants With FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA Alone
NCT ID: NCT06522321
Last Updated: 2024-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-15
2024-10-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Immediately Placed Dental Implants With Local Application of Injectable PRF in Periodontally Compromised Sites
NCT04029779
Comparision of Clinical Efficacy of Immediate Implants With T-PRF and Bone-graft Versus PRF and Bone-graft
NCT06525324
Peri-implant Papillary Height Comparison in Microsurgically and Macrosurgically Placed Dental Implants
NCT04189328
Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Short Implants With Standard-Length Implants - a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT06520332
Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site
NCT04189718
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, three months and six months postoperatively
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. TEST GROUP (n =10)- FDBA and PRF(i-prf) with immediate implant placement.
2. CONTROL GROUP (n = 10) - FDBA alone with immediate implant placement.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimension Around Immediate with FDBA and i-PRF vs FDBA
TEST GROUP: FDBA and I-PRF with immediate implant placement. Local anesthesia is given. Atraumatic extraction is done. I-PRF is prepared by centrifugation procedure. Osteotomy is done at the selected site after radiographic assessment. Immediate implant is placement along with I-PRF and FDBA. Suture is placed at the surgical site.
i-PRF and FDBA
A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with FDBA and I-PRF (experimental group) will be placed according to the standard protocol.
An immediate implant with FDBA( comparative group) will be placed according to the standard protocol .
The surgical wound closure will be coapted with sutures
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Dimensions Around Immediate Implants With FDBA and I-PRF vs FDBA
CONTROL GROUP: FDBA alone with immediate implant placement. Local anesthesia is given. Atraumatic extraction is done.Osteotomy is done at the selected site after radiographic assessment. Immediate implant is placement along with FDBA alone. Suture is placed at the surgical site.
i-PRF and FDBA
A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with FDBA and I-PRF (experimental group) will be placed according to the standard protocol.
An immediate implant with FDBA( comparative group) will be placed according to the standard protocol .
The surgical wound closure will be coapted with sutures
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
i-PRF and FDBA
A mucoperiosteal flap will be raised and atraumatic extraction will be done. An immediate implant with FDBA and I-PRF (experimental group) will be placed according to the standard protocol.
An immediate implant with FDBA( comparative group) will be placed according to the standard protocol .
The surgical wound closure will be coapted with sutures
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Presence of non-restorable single rooted teeth (maxillary or mandibular) due to trauma, caries, root resorption, root fracture, endodontic or periodontal failure.
3. Grade I or Grade II extraction socket according to El Chaar et al 2016.
4. Good oral hygiene.
5. Good patient compliance.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.
3. Patients who are psychologically unable to participate.
4. Pregnant patients, patients with bone diseases and patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy, alcohol or drug abuse.
5. Patients with hemorrhagic disorders.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Prabhuji MLV
HOD OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr Prabhuji MLV, MDS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
PROFESSOR AND HOD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Prabhuji MLV
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02_D012_147480
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.