Peri-implant Papillary Height Comparison in Microsurgically and Macrosurgically Placed Dental Implants

NCT ID: NCT04189328

Last Updated: 2019-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-10

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone loss around single implants when placed macrosurgically and microsurgically.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Black triangles in dentition especially in the anterior teeth would pose an esthetic concern. Interdental papilla height is crucial for eliminating this black triangle.

32 participants, 16 in two groups were assigned randomly. Microsurgical approach using microsurgical instruments and magnifying loupes were used for one group participants and similar procedure without magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments was done in the other group.

comparsion of the microsurgical outcome is done by measuring peri implant papilla gain and radiographic crestal bone loss will be done between the groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

conventional macrosurgical implant placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

macrosurgical dental implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

macrosurgical placement of single dental implants

test group

microsurgical implant placement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dental implant placement using magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

microsurgical dental implant placement employin splt finger technique by Misch

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dental implant placement using magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments

microsurgical dental implant placement employin splt finger technique by Misch

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

macrosurgical dental implant placement

macrosurgical placement of single dental implants

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients desiring implant placement for replacement of missing tooth and willing to participate in the study

* Non smokers
* Patients who do not report any relevant medically comprimising conditions or had not received any radiation therapy in head and neck region for cancer therapy.
* Subjects with satisfactory residual ridges who demonstrated adequate bucco-lingual and mesio-distal space for implant placement, that facilitates primary stability.
* Patients who demonstrate Plaque Index \<10% and good compliance.
* Full mouth bleeding scores ≤25% before the implant placement.
* Sites with sufficient band of keratinised mucosa.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Pregnant and lactating females

* Patients on anticancer therapy and immunosuppressant drugs.
* Implants to be placed in sites with previous periodontal disease
* Bleeding disorder or on anticoagulant therapy
* Systemic diseases that would negatively influence wound healing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr.Joann pauline George, MDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences and hospital

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02_D012_82168

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id