Peri-implant Bone Changes in Post-menopausal Osteoporotic Women
NCT ID: NCT02884401
Last Updated: 2022-11-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2022-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will include 20 post-menopausal osteoporotic women with a requirement of a tooth to be replaced. The main objective of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar (jaw) bone changes in width and height after the placement of a dental implant with a hydrophilic (SLActive) surface and 12 months after loading (placement of the crown) it in post-menopausal osteoporotic women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bone Dimensional Changes at Different Implant-to-abutment Connections: a 1-year Clinical and Radiological Study
NCT01807416
Impact of Buccal Bone Thickness on Pathological Peri-implant Bone Loss: A 3-year Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02939222
Evaluation of Using Different Screwed Abutment Height
NCT06017115
A Study of the Crestal Bone Loss Around Bone Level Versus Tissue Level Implants in Non-compliant Patients With Healthy or Reduced Periodontium After 5-8 Years in Function
NCT04942808
Periimplant Bone Changes in Different Abutment Heights and Insertion Timing in Posterior Mandibular Areas
NCT04340726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Once the referral letter arrives at the Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Barts Health, the patient will be contacted to answer any further question and to book an appointment to attend the enrolment visit, should they wish.
The study consists of 8 visits that will be performed over a minimum period of 15 months at the Centre for Oral Clinical Research at the School of Dentistry of Queen Mary University of London (QMUL):
1. Enrollment visit:
* Signing of informed consent;
* Recording of any concomitant medication;
* Confirmation of participant eligibility pertaining to the presence of an intercalate single edentulous area fulfilling the inclusion criteria (wisdom teeth and second molars excluded)
* Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE) recording;
* Clinical measurement of the periodontal parameter in the teeth adjacent to the area where the implant will be placed (Probing pocket Depth, PPD; Recession, REC; Plaque Index, PI; Bleeding on Probing, BOP)
* Exit participant if not eligible, arrangement for full-mouth debridement treatment outside the study protocol (if needed) and refer to GDP for other dental problems (such as caries and endodontic infections).
If the patient agrees, a letter will be sent to the General Practitioner (GP) to inform about the participation in the study.
2. Full-mouth debridement(within 90 days from enrolment):
* Recording of any Adverse Event (AE) or concomitant medication;
* Oral hygiene instructions and supra and sub gingival debridement of all teeth (as necessary) using ultrasonic and hand instruments as indicated. Local anaesthesia may be used as required to ensure pain control for the participant.
In case a participant requires further periodontal treatment, this will be arranged outside the study protocol. No implant will be placed until a condition of periodontal health (no pockets ≥5 mm) will be reached.
• In order to plan the implant placement and according to the clinician's judgment and the complexity of the case, either a Cone Bean Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan or a peri-apical intra-oral x-ray, limited at the area of the implant placement, will be taken.
3. Implant placement (within 120 days from visit 2):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Implant placement. If required, simultaneous horizontal guided regeneration (GBR) of the alveolar bone with a collagen membrane (Collprotect®, Botiss®, Zossen, Germany) and a bovine osteoconductive graft (Cerabone, Botiss®, Zossen, Germany) will be performed;
* Recording of maximum torque at placement;
* Healing cap screwed for semi-submerged healing;
* Resonance frequency analysis;
* Standardized CBCT scan limited to the implant area No sinus lift cases will be taken into consideration.
4. Suture removal (7 days + 3 days from Visit 3):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Clinical evaluation of soft tissue healing (visual inspection of the surgical site and report of any complication);
* Suture removal;
* Resonance frequency analysis;
* Standardized CBCT scan limited to the implant area (if not performed on the day of implant placement).
5. Implant impression (6 weeks ± 7 days from Visit 3):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Implant impression;
* Resonance frequency analysis. In case horizontal GBR is performed simultaneously to implant placement, the implant impression will be performed 11 weeks (+7 days) after implant placement.
6. Implant loading (8 weeks ± 7 days from Visit 3):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Clinical measurement of the periodontal parameter in the teeth adjacent to the implant (PPD, REC, PI, BOP);
* Implant loading and occlusion control;
* Resonance frequency analysis;
* Peri-apical X-ray In case GBR is performed simultaneously to implant placement, the implant impression will be performed 12 weeks (+7 days) after implant placement.
7. 6-months follow-up (6 months ± 14 days from Visit 6):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Clinical measurement of the periodontal parameter in the teeth adjacent to the implant (PPD, REC, PI, BOP) and on the implant
* Polish and oral hygiene instructions;
* Resonance frequency analysis;
8. 12-months follow-up (12 months ± 14 days from Visit 6):
* Recording of any AE or concomitant medication;
* Clinical measurement of the periodontal parameter in the teeth adjacent to the implant (PPD, REC, PI, BOP) and on the implant;
* Polish and oral hygiene instructions;
* Resonance frequency analysis;
* CBCT scan and evaluation of implant survival and success. Photos of the teeth/implant may be taken to facilitate case documentation. The photos will be strictly limited to the implant/teeth area so that subjects will not be identifiable.
At study completion, a letter will be sent to the patient's GDP to inform about the treatments provided and highlight any need for further treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
osteoporotic women with a missing tooth
Post-menopausal osteoporotic women with a missing tooth and willing to replace it with a dental implant
Dental implant placement (Straumann® Bone Level Tapered, BLT, Roxolid® SLActive®)
A tapered bone level implant (Straumann® BLT Roxolid® SLActive®, Basel, Switzerland) will be placed according to the manufactures guidelines trying to achieve primary stability in the correct prosthetic position
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant placement (Straumann® Bone Level Tapered, BLT, Roxolid® SLActive®)
A tapered bone level implant (Straumann® BLT Roxolid® SLActive®, Basel, Switzerland) will be placed according to the manufactures guidelines trying to achieve primary stability in the correct prosthetic position
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not in treatment with anti-resorptive agents (like bisphosphonates and denosumab) for more than 4 consecutive years, in order to reduce the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (Lo et al., 2010).
* ≥ 50 years old.
* In self-reported menopause, defined as the permanent cessation of ovulation, for at least one year (Soules et al., 2001).
* Edentulous area involving a maximum of two teeth (wisdom teeth and second molars are excluded) and presenting at least one neighbouring tooth (e.g. gap in the area of a second premolar and first molar, with first premolar in place).
* Residual alveolar width ≥ 4 mm (Milinkovic and Cordaro, 2014), residual alveolar height \>8 mm, enough inter-arch space for a crown (at least 5 mm) and a minimum distance of 7 mm from the adjacent teeth (Shah and Lum, 2008). The width and height will be confirmed after x-ray examination in Visit 2.
* Possibility to restore a functional occlusion with a minimum of four occlusal units (i.e. pairs of occluding posterior teeth).
* Willingness to replace the missing tooth/teeth with dental implants
* Registration with a GDP
Exclusion Criteria
* Affected by systemic diseases recognized to severely affect bone metabolism (e.g. Cushing's syndrome, Addison's disease, diabetes mellitus type 1, leukaemia, pernicious anaemia, malabsorption syndromes, chronic liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis).
* Knowingly affected by HIV or Hepatitis.
* History of local radiation therapy in the last five years.
* Affected by limited mental capacity or language skills such that study information cannot be understood, informed consent cannot be obtained, or simple instructions cannot be followed.
* Presenting an acute endodontic/periodontal lesion in the neighboring areas to the implant site.
* Completely edentulous
* With evident severe atrophy of the alveolar ridge that could preclude an implant placement (e.g. sharp knife edge ridge)
* Severe bruxism or clenching habits
* Smokers of \> 5 cigarettes a day.
* A daily alcohol intake \>2 units/day.
* Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality which may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this trial.
* Patients unable or not willing to return for follow-ups.
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen Mary University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nikolaos Donos, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen Mary University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts Health, QMUL
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004 Jul;83(7):529-33. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300704.
Calciolari E, Donos N, Park JC, Petrie A, Mardas N. A systematic review on the correlation between skeletal and jawbone mineral density in osteoporotic subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):433-42. doi: 10.1111/clr.12597. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
Dao TT, Anderson JD, Zarb GA. Is osteoporosis a risk factor for osseointegration of dental implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(2):137-44.
Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Bosshardt DD, Ivanovski S. Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):365-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x.
Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):349-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x.
Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive surface in guided bone formation in osteoporotic-like conditions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):406-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02094.x. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
Elena C, Nikos M, Iro P, Sara T, Nikolaos D. Radiographic Peri-Implant Bone Changes in Osteoporotic Women Treated With a Ti-Zr, Bone Level Tapered Implant With a Hydrophilic Surface: A 12-Month Prospective Case-Series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Oct;36(10):1234-1247. doi: 10.1111/clr.14469. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
010890
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.