Clinical Success of Short Dental Implants Alone and Standard Dental Implants Combined With Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxillae
NCT ID: NCT02350075
Last Updated: 2019-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-01
2017-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Extra-short (4 mm) Implants Used as Distal Support of a Maxillary Full-arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis vs. 10 mm Implants Installed After Sinus Floor Elevation.
NCT03958448
Short vs Standard Implants in Maxilla
NCT03479333
Comparative (Short vs. Standard) Length Implants in Early Stability Patterns.
NCT07162389
Effect of Bone Augmentation Simultaneous to Implant Removal on the Prognosis of Reimplantation at the Same Site
NCT07078890
Short Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region
NCT05081050
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. We plan to enroll 180 patients in need of dental implant treatment in posterior maxilla. All patients will sign the informed consent form before treatment. The study is approval by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, China. The clinical component of the study will be initiated in May 2015 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University, China.
A block randomization sequence will be used to assign eligible patients to three groups: Group 1: short implants (6mm) alone; Group 2: standard implants (10mm) combined with OSFE. The assignment will be concealed from the clinical operators until the beginning of implant surgery. The outcome examiners and patients will be kept blinded to the assignment.
The required sample size is calculated based on the primary outcome parameter, implant survival rate. A recent study (Rossi et al. 2016) compared survival rate of short implants and standard implants (Survival rate: 86.7% VS 96.7%). If α=0.05, and 1-β =0.8, a sample size of n=116 per group is required. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, 125 patients per group will be required. The total required sample size will thus be n=250.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short implants group
Patients receive short dental implants installation (6mm) without additional augmentation procedures.
Dental implants installation
Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.
Standard implants with OSFE group
Patients receive standard dental implants installation (10mm) combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation.
Dental implants installation
Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.
Osteotome Sinus floor elevation
Osteotomes with different diameters are specially-designed device to vertically increase the bone volume in atrophic maxilla.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implants installation
Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.
Osteotome Sinus floor elevation
Osteotomes with different diameters are specially-designed device to vertically increase the bone volume in atrophic maxilla.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* residual bone height range from 6-8mm,
* sufficient bone width in edentulous region.
Exclusion Criteria
* heavy smoker (\>10 cigarettes per days),
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or other systemic diseases,
* uncontrolled periodontal infection,
* insufficient bone quality to achieve implant stability and
* previous implant installation or bone grafting at surgical site.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Junyu Shi
Medical Doctor, Department of oral and maxillofacial implants
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jun-Yu Shi
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mangano FG, Shibli JA, Sammons RL, Iaculli F, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):933-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12181. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
Lai HC, Si MS, Zhuang LF, Shen H, Liu YL, Wismeijer D. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24(2):230-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):241-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x.
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.
Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Jan;42(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12323. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
Zhang XM, Shi JY, Gu YX, Qiao SC, Mo JJ, Lai HC. Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):161-166. doi: 10.1111/cid.12435. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Shi JY, Gu YX, Qiao SC, Zhuang LF, Zhang XM, Lai HC. Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:324. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0853-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012CB933600
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.