Clinical Success of Short Dental Implants Alone and Standard Dental Implants Combined With Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxillae

NCT ID: NCT02350075

Last Updated: 2019-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-01

Study Completion Date

2017-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical success of short implants (6mm) alone and standard implants (10mm) combined with sinus floor elevation in atrophic maxilla.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Implant treatment in posterior maxilla is commonly faced with great challenges due to the limited residual bone height and poor bone quality. Efforts have been made to allow successful implant treatment in atrophic posterior maxillae.Osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) has been proven to be a predictable surgical procedure to vertically increase the bone volume in atrophic maxilla.On the other hand, short implants (intra-bony length of 8mm or less) are being increasingly used in extremely resorbed maxilla to avoid additional surgical trauma and expense.However, still limited randomized controlled trials have compared the clinical success of short implants and standard implants combined with OSFE.

This study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. We plan to enroll 180 patients in need of dental implant treatment in posterior maxilla. All patients will sign the informed consent form before treatment. The study is approval by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, China. The clinical component of the study will be initiated in May 2015 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University, China.

A block randomization sequence will be used to assign eligible patients to three groups: Group 1: short implants (6mm) alone; Group 2: standard implants (10mm) combined with OSFE. The assignment will be concealed from the clinical operators until the beginning of implant surgery. The outcome examiners and patients will be kept blinded to the assignment.

The required sample size is calculated based on the primary outcome parameter, implant survival rate. A recent study (Rossi et al. 2016) compared survival rate of short implants and standard implants (Survival rate: 86.7% VS 96.7%). If α=0.05, and 1-β =0.8, a sample size of n=116 per group is required. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, 125 patients per group will be required. The total required sample size will thus be n=250.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Short implants group

Patients receive short dental implants installation (6mm) without additional augmentation procedures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dental implants installation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.

Standard implants with OSFE group

Patients receive standard dental implants installation (10mm) combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation.

Group Type OTHER

Dental implants installation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.

Osteotome Sinus floor elevation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Osteotomes with different diameters are specially-designed device to vertically increase the bone volume in atrophic maxilla.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dental implants installation

Dental implants installation is a procedure to insert dental implants into alveolar bone.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osteotome Sinus floor elevation

Osteotomes with different diameters are specially-designed device to vertically increase the bone volume in atrophic maxilla.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age≧18 years, partial edentulism in posterior maxilla for at least three months from tooth loss,
* residual bone height range from 6-8mm,
* sufficient bone width in edentulous region.

Exclusion Criteria

The patients will be excluded on the basis of:

* heavy smoker (\>10 cigarettes per days),
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or other systemic diseases,
* uncontrolled periodontal infection,
* insufficient bone quality to achieve implant stability and
* previous implant installation or bone grafting at surgical site.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Junyu Shi

Medical Doctor, Department of oral and maxillofacial implants

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jun-Yu Shi

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mangano FG, Shibli JA, Sammons RL, Iaculli F, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a prospective clinical study with 1-to 10-years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):933-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12181. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23621393 (View on PubMed)

Lai HC, Si MS, Zhuang LF, Shen H, Liu YL, Wismeijer D. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24(2):230-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02452.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22469075 (View on PubMed)

Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):241-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18724853 (View on PubMed)

Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18724852 (View on PubMed)

Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Schincaglia GP, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Jan;42(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12323. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25418606 (View on PubMed)

Zhang XM, Shi JY, Gu YX, Qiao SC, Mo JJ, Lai HC. Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):161-166. doi: 10.1111/cid.12435. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27389435 (View on PubMed)

Shi JY, Gu YX, Qiao SC, Zhuang LF, Zhang XM, Lai HC. Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:324. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0853-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26223254 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012CB933600

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.