Implant Stability Changes Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols for Posterior Dental Implants

NCT ID: NCT06989684

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-30

Study Completion Date

2027-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial aims to compare two drilling protocols Underdrilling and Osseodensification for placing dental implants in patients with low bone density. The purpose is to compare which technique provides better primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior regions of the jaw with low bone density. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in implant stability between the two protocols.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Achieving sufficient primary stability becomes difficult in areas with low bone density. One technique commonly used is Underdrilling protocol.With the Underdrilling technique, the final osteotomy is smaller than the diameter of the implant to be placed.A relatively new Osseodensification protocol, introduced by Huwais in 2013, employs specially designed bur that smoothly compact the bone as they expand an osteotomy. This may prove to be particularly helpful in cases with low bone quality.This clinical trial aims to compare the implant stability using these drilling protocols

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant Stability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Double blinding will be performed. The patient, the outcome assessor and data analyst will be blinded to the allocation

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Osseodensification

Osseodensification uses special densa burs for osteotomy site compaction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Osseodensification

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osseodensification uses specially designed burs to densify osteotomy site

Underilling

In Underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Underdrilling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osseodensification

Osseodensification uses specially designed burs to densify osteotomy site

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Underdrilling

In underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient partially edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 6 months and with low bone density.
2. Systemically healthy patients ≥18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Smokers.
2. Pregnant or lactating females.
3. Uncontrolled systemic disease like diabetes, hypertension, hormonal therapy and hematologic diseases.
4. History of Maxillary sinus pathology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr.Ritika Arora, MDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PGIDS,Rohtak

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

PGIDS

Rohtak, Haryana, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chain Shilpa, MDS

Role: CONTACT

+91 9814272797

Dr.Sanjay Tewari, MDS

Role: CONTACT

01262-297876

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHAINSHILPA-PERIO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.