Intraoral Scanning v.s Desktop Scanning

NCT ID: NCT06509269

Last Updated: 2024-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoral scanning versus desktop scanning on the retention and adaptation of maxillary denture bases in completely edentulous patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of intra oral scanners (IOS) for rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients is still limited due to the difficulty in scanning large edentulous areas that are smooth and devoid of features. The stitching process can be defective, especially in the palatal area, where, the outmost deviations were reported in the palate when digitizing edentulous jaws with intraoral scanners. The main challenges for a fully digitized complete denture workflow are the digital impression of mobile tissues with functional border molding and the digital registration of the jaw relationship.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Edentulous Jaw

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Desktop Scanning

Desktop scanning of Definitive Impression

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Desktop scanning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Desktop scanning of definitive impression

IntraOral Scanning

Intraoral scanning of edentulous Jaw

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intraoral scanning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraoral Scanning of edentulous Jaw

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intraoral scanning

Intraoral Scanning of edentulous Jaw

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Desktop scanning

Desktop scanning of definitive impression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with well-developed ridge
* Firm healthy mucosa
* Free from any signs of inflammation

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients having flabby ridge
* Decreased flow of saliva
* Limited mouth opening
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

British University In Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ramy khalifa ashmawy

Ass.Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ramy K Elashmawy, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

British University In Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

British University in Egypt

Cairo, Shorook, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Osman RB, Alharbi NM. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;32(9):821-828. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13633. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36571837 (View on PubMed)

Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Troiano G, Salamini A, Guida L, Ciavarella D. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31153614 (View on PubMed)

Manicone PF, De Angelis P, Rella E, Damis G, D'addona A. Patient preference and clinical working time between digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.042. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33678434 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Digital scanning

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trueness of Digital Occlusal Analysis
NCT06672627 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING