Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-20

Study Completion Date

2023-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Participants will be divided into groups. In group A, Composite restoration done using oblique incremental technique. In group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. VAS scoring to evaluate the primary outcome at one day, one week and two weeks.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites

NCT06852586

Class I Dental Caries

COMPLETED NA

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composites With Incrementally Layered Conventional Composites

NCT07078110

Postoperative Sensitivity Anatomic Form of the Restoration Colour Match of the Restoration +4 more

COMPLETED NA

One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria

NCT02891967

Post Dental Restoration

RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of Post-operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Versus the Nano Resin Composite.

NCT03792178

Sensitivity

COMPLETED NA

A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities

NCT05952609

Secondary Caries

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After the approval from ethical research committee, a written informed consent taken. Participants were briefed about the intervention with its associated merits and demerits. The restorative procedures were accomplished under rubber dam isolation using adequate local anesthesia. The principles of minimally intervention and adhesive dentistry were employed. Participants were allocated into two groups. In group A, restorative interventive was performed using Oblique incremental placement while in group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. Post-operative sensitivity was recorded at one day, one week and two week follow up using a Visual analogue scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Class II Dental Caries Sensitivity, Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In this study, participants allocated in two groups by Consecutive non-random sampling technique

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

This is a double-blinded study in which the participant and the outcome assessor masked.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Oblique Incremental Placement Techniique)

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group A ( Oblique Incremental Placement Technique)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

Group B (Bulk-fill Placement Technique)

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group B (Bulk-fill Placement technique)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group A ( Oblique Incremental Placement Technique)

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Group B (Bulk-fill Placement technique)

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Minimum 18 years of age with good general health
* Vital and Periodontally stable teeth
* Class-II primary carious lesions with a cavity depth of 3 to 5 mm
* Established contact with adjacent and opposing natural or prosthetic teeth
* Prior defective restorations in need of replacement (secondary caries, marginal fractures, and marginal staining)

Exclusion Criteria

* Teeth with a history of spontaneous pain
* Compromised oral health status
* Patients with parafunctional habits or temporomandibular disorders
* Previously endodontically treated teeth or evidence of associated periapical/periodontal pathosis
* Participants with a drug history of using anti-inflammatory, analgesics, or psychotropic medications within the last 2 weeks

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes