Comparison of Retention of Self-etch Sealants and Flowable Composite in Permanent Molars
NCT ID: NCT06895096
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
46 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retention of Pits and Fissure Sealants on Non Carious vs Initial Carious Enamel Lesions in Posterior Teeth
NCT07330089
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105
Effects of Rebonding Technique and Final Cure in Post-operative Hypersensitivity in Class 1 Composite Restorations
NCT07041424
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
NCT06092567
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retention of self-Etch sealants vs flowable composite in contralateral molars
Comparison of retention of self-etch sealants and flowable composite in inter-arch contralateral molars
Pit Fissure Sealant
Flowable composite is being used for the purpose of sealing pits and fissures which require etching and bonding before application whereas self etch sealants are self adhesive and do not require etching and sealing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pit Fissure Sealant
Flowable composite is being used for the purpose of sealing pits and fissures which require etching and bonding before application whereas self etch sealants are self adhesive and do not require etching and sealing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with completely erupted maxillary and mandibular molars with deep pits and fissures having a score of 0 or 1 according to ICDAS classification -
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with history of prolonged medication such as steroids, chemotherapy or TB medication.
3. Teeth with carious lesion extending to dentino-enamel junction/dentin.
4. Patients with poor oral hygiene.
5. Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits.
6. Permanent molars with developmental defects or restorations.
7. Teeth with poor prognosis and having periodontal diseases.
8 Years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Foundation University Islamabad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shoaib Rahim
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foundation university college of Dentistry and Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Singh C, Kaur K, Kapoor K. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An in vivo one-year comparative evaluation
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FUCDCLINIC-2407
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.