Comparing Train-of-Four Recovery in the Adductor Pollicis Versus the Adductor Digiti Minimi in Elective Surgery Patients
NCT ID: NCT06467448
Last Updated: 2026-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
57 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-03-18
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This proposed study aims to observe and compare the TOF ratio between two different muscles of the hand: adductor pollicis and adductor digiti minim using anesthesia monitors on both of their arms during recovery of neuromuscular function. Surgery and anesthesia will occur per standard of care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictive Modelling of the Intraoperative Train-of-Four (TOF) Ratio
NCT04518761
Comparison of Adductor Pollicis and Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscles (Thumb Vs. Fifth Digit) As Sites for Neuromuscular Monitoring with Electromyography
NCT06691204
Neuromuscular Monitoring:TOFCuff Versus EMG
NCT04282213
Evaluation of the Tof Cuff for Perioperative Neuromuscular Transmission
NCT03117387
Residual Paralysis in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit: the Association Beetween Residual Neuromuscular Block Risk Prediction Score and the Train-of-Four Ratio. a Prospective Single-Center Open-Label Cohort Study
NCT06796777
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Procedures (methods):
Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with the use of muscle relaxants will have anesthesia monitors on both of their arms. On one arm, the study sticky pad will be placed on the forearm and over the base of the little finger. On the other arm, the standard monitor is placed on the forearm and over the base of the thumb.
To identify pre-operative patients, an EPIC report will be utilized to screen for eligible participants. Patients will be contacted via phone by a research team member the day before their procedure and enrolled. Informed consent will be formally obtained on the day of the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adductor Pollicis EMG
The Train of Four Ratio will be recorded at 90% as a time and as a reference point
EMG Assessement of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
EMG Train of Four Assessment of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
Adductor Digiti Minimi
The Train of Four Ratio will be recorded when the adductor pollicis ratio reads 90%
EMG Assessement of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
EMG Train of Four Assessment of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMG Assessement of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
EMG Train of Four Assessment of Recovery of Neuromuscular Function
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to use one of subjects arms to record neuromuscular monitor.
* Contraindication to administration or allergy to non depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stuart Grant
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-1013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.