A Comparative Study Between Arm Intravenous Regional Anesthesia Versus Forearm Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hand and Wrist Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06448845

Last Updated: 2024-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The technique of intravenous regional analgesia using a tourniquet consisting of two cuffs over the upper arm is a well-known procedure, With the tourniquet being conventionally placed over the upper arm, a relatively high dose of local anaesthetic drug is required and occasionally systemic toxic reactions have occurred.

The purpose of the present study is to establish the efficacy of the technique of intravenous regional analgesia with a forearm tourniquet using reduced doses of lidocaine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Several ways of anesthesia can be used to perform hand surgery, being general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia as well as locoregional anesthesia. Locoregional anesthesia and intravenous regional anesthesia are often performed since patients can be discharged from the hospital more rapidly. A conventional Biers block is performed using a tourniquet on the upper arm to create a bloodless field and to contain the anesthetics within the surgical area.

A mini-Biers block in which the tourniquet is placed on the forearm, has been shown to be a safe and effective way of anesthesia to perform hand and wrist surgery. By using this type of anesthesia, the dose of the anesthetic can be reduced compared to a conventional Bier's block which reduces the risk of systemic toxicity reactions.

Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) or Bier's Block is a simple and effective but underused anesthetic technique for hand and wrist surgery, This technique, introduced by Dr.August Bier in1908, provides complete anesthesia as well as a bloodless field during surgery.

Traditionally, an upper arm tourniquet has been used to sequester the local anesthetic and to create a bloodless Surgical field. Major complications after IVRA with an upper arm tourniquet are rare but are mostly related to local anesthetic systemic toxicity after release of the tourniquet.

Use of a forearm tourniquet has been introduced in 1978 and comes with the big advantage of lower (non-toxic) local anesthetic dosage requirement to produce a good quality of analgesia.

Consequently, there is no minimal tourniquet inflation time after forearm IVRA. In addition ,it has been postulated that sensory onset time after forearm IVRA may be shorter than after upper arm IVRA. With these two features forearm IVRA may be the ideal anesthetic technique for short surgery of hand and wrist.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intravenous Anesthetic Agent Overdose Hand Injury Wrist

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Arm IVRA) 70 patients

After placement of the upper arm and forearm tourniquets and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the arm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The double arm cuff pneumatic pressure tourniquet is placed immediately above the elbow crease and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast padding before inflation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arm intravenous regional anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After placement of the upper arm and forearm tourniquets and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the arm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The double arm cuff pneumatic pressure tourniquet is placed immediately above the elbow crease and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast padding before inflation. Subsequently, tourniquet failure is ruled out by observing the absence of distal circulation and 40 ml 0.5% lidocaine is slowly injected through the intravenous cannula on the dorsum of the hand. The tourniquet remained inflated for 60 minutes from injection of lidocaine to reduce the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)

Group F (Forearm IVRA) 70 patients

After placement of the forearm double tourniquet and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the forearm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The forearm tourniquet will be placed 5 cm distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Forearm IVRA block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After placement of the forearm double tourniquet and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the forearm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The forearm tourniquet will be placed 5 cm distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast. Subsequently, tourniquet failure is ruled out by observing the distal circulation and 25 ml 0.5% lidocaine is slowly injected through the intravenous cannula on the dorsum of the hand.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arm intravenous regional anesthesia

After placement of the upper arm and forearm tourniquets and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the arm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The double arm cuff pneumatic pressure tourniquet is placed immediately above the elbow crease and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast padding before inflation. Subsequently, tourniquet failure is ruled out by observing the absence of distal circulation and 40 ml 0.5% lidocaine is slowly injected through the intravenous cannula on the dorsum of the hand. The tourniquet remained inflated for 60 minutes from injection of lidocaine to reduce the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Forearm IVRA block

After placement of the forearm double tourniquet and exsanguination of the limb distal to the cuff by applying an Esmarch's bandage starting from the fingertips, the forearm tourniquet cuff is inflated to a pressure of 250 mmHg. The forearm tourniquet will be placed 5 cm distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus and on the top of a circumferentially placed cotton cast. Subsequently, tourniquet failure is ruled out by observing the distal circulation and 25 ml 0.5% lidocaine is slowly injected through the intravenous cannula on the dorsum of the hand.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bier's Block Mini Bier's Block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to II.
* Both sexes.
* ≥ 21 to 65 years.
* scheduled for elective hand and wrist surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria

* American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≥3 or BMI ≥40
* Patients will do bilateral hand surgery
* Local site infection.
* Allergy to local anesthetics.
* Patient refusal
* Patients with pre-existing myopathy or neuropathy on the operating limb.
* Patients with significant cognitive dysfunction.
* Chronic analgesic abuser patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain shams university hospitals

Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU MD 148/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bier's Block Versus Systemic Analgesia
NCT03349216 UNKNOWN PHASE2