The Effect of Local Anesthetic Volume Within the Adductor Canal on Quadriceps Function Evaluated by Electromyography
NCT ID: NCT02344589
Last Updated: 2015-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Versus ACB /Saphenous Block in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair
NCT04443634
Location of Injection of Local Anesthetics in the Adductor Canal Block
NCT02554864
The Efficacy of Adductor-Canal-Block (ACB) in Patients After Knee Arthroscopy
NCT01254825
Adductor-Canal-Blockade Versus the Femoral Nerve Block Effect on Muscle Strength and Mobilization in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01449097
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Block on Pain and Quadriceps Strength
NCT05190120
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Even though the ACB is mainly a sensory nerve block, a study in healthy volunteers showed a small decline by 8% in quadriceps muscle strength(10). It is speculated that the decline in muscle strength was caused by the spread of local anesthetic to the nerve supplying the vastus medialis of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Three out of eleven of the volunteers experienced an even larger decline of 25 % in quadriceps muscle strength. It has been argued that this decline likely was caused by a proximal spread of the local anesthetic to the femoral triangle thereby resulting in an affection of the femoral nerve. In this study, a volume of 30 ml of local anesthetic was used.
We do not know the optimal volume for the ACB and we find it relevant to investigate to what extent and which parts of the quadriceps muscle gets affected when different volumes of a local anesthetic are injected into the adductor canal. Selective affection of the different components of the femoral quadriceps muscle can be assessed by non-invasive EMG recordings. Further, the quadriceps femoris muscle strength will be evaluated by measuring the MVIC following the different volumes. The EMG recordings will be voluntary (vEMG) measured during MVIC and stimulated (sEMG). sEMG is measured during transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the femoral nerve.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACB 10
ACB in right leg with 10ml of lidocaine 10mg/ml. Subject and assessor blinded, randomized. given on day 1, 2 or 3
Lidocaine
used for the active blocks
ACB 20
ACB in right leg with 20ml of lidocaine 10mg/ml. Subject and assessor blinded, randomized. given on day 1, 2 or 3
Lidocaine
used for the active blocks
ACB 30
ACB in right leg with 30ml of lidocaine 10mg/ml. Subject and assessor blinded, randomized. given on day 1, 2 or 3
Lidocaine
used for the active blocks
FNB
FNB in left leg with 20ml of lidocaine 10mg/ml on day 1. Unblinded arm, used for model control
Lidocaine
used for the active blocks
Placebo
ACB in left leg with 30ml of isotonic saline on day 2. Unblinded arm used for model control
Saline
used for the placebo-block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine
used for the active blocks
Saline
used for the placebo-block
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who gave their written informed consent to participating in the study after having fully understood the contents of the protocol and re-strictions.
* ASA 1
* Male
* BMI 18-30
* Physical exercise 1-3 hours/week
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who cannot understand or speak Danish.
* Subjects with allergy to the medicines used in the study.
* Subjects suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse - based on the investi-gator's opinion.
* Pathology or previous surgery or trauma to the lower limb.
* Intense exercise 24 h before the tests
* Intake of any analgesics 24 h prior to baseline measurements.
18 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ulrik Grevstad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ulrik Grevstad
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulrik Grevstad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gentofte Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SM-UG-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.