Neuromuscular Monitoring:TOFCuff Versus EMG

NCT ID: NCT04282213

Last Updated: 2021-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-15

Study Completion Date

2020-05-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mechanomyography (MMG) is considered the gold-standard for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring. However, it is quite bulky and difficult to use on a routine basis. Therefore, alternative methods like Acceleromyography (AMG), Electromyography (EMG) and the TOF-CUFF method have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the TOF-Cuff monitor and Electromyography (EMG-NMT module with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor) data following rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade and its reversal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuromuscular relaxation of the patient during surgery is necessary for multiple reasons, such as facilitating intubation or improving the effectiveness of some surgical procedures. Premature extubation of the patient without having achieved a complete recovery of the NMB can have deleterious consequences, increasing postoperative complications, especially those related to the respiratory system. Given this, current guidelines of good clinical practice recommend the monitoring of pharmacologically induced NMB during general anesthesia. In addition, monitoring allows confirmation of optimum relaxation before intubation, and allows for control over re-dose administration and recovery of NMB upon awakening from general anesthesia.

There are different methods of quantitative monitoring of NMB. The TOF-CUFF monitor uses a method based on a traditional pressure cuff that incorporates stimulation electrodes. The placement of the cuff which aligns the stimulation electrodes on the path of the brachial plexus at the humeral level allows to evaluate the muscular response evoked from the changes in the cuff pressure, generated by the muscular contraction after the electrical stimulus. Its main advantage is that monitoring of the NMB is included within the pressure cuff itself, which is always used in any anesthetic act. Then, when the pressure cuff is placed, monitoring of the NMB is easily established. This specific design facilitates the task of anesthesiologists because they do not have to perform any additional preparation for the monitoring of NMB.

The TOF-CUFF monitor has been validated regarding the mechanomyography, which is considered the gold-standard for the monitoring of NMB. The main objective of the study is to compare the values of NMB measured with the TOF-CUFF monitor with NMB values measured with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor during the pharmacologically induced NMB and evaluate the degree of equivalence in different situations. Secondary objective is to verify that the design for joint monitoring of the NMB and NIBP in the TOF-CUFF monitor does not affect the independent measure of the two variables.

Prospective, single-center, open and controlled observational clinical study. The study is aimed to be conducted with 40 patients aged between 18 and 65 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromuscular Blockade

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control samples

For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with GE CARESCAPE B450 monitor (E-NMT module).

No interventions assigned to this group

Case samples

For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with TOFCuff monitor.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I-II
* Patients who give their written informed consent
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia that according to the anesthetic plan muscle relaxants will be administered

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who refuse to give their informed consent
* Patients who present any of the contraindications for the devices used in the study
* Patients who are participating or have participated in a clinical trial during the 4 weeks prior to inclusion
* Women of childbearing age who do not use effective contraceptive methods, pregnant women, with suspicion of pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Patients with the following criteria: upper limb peripheral vascular pathologies, a difficult airway, myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular diseases, use of medication that may alter NMT
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Servei Central d'Anestesiologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lorena Silva Gil

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lorena Silva Gil, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Servei d'Anestesiologia Centro Médico Teknon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro Médico Teknon

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):110-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19910616 (View on PubMed)

Veiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Dec;64(10):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Jun 27. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28662770 (View on PubMed)

Rodiera J, Serradell A, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Aliaga L. The cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00777.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16223405 (View on PubMed)

Checketts MR, Jenkins B, Pandit JJ. Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:3-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13736. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28044335 (View on PubMed)

Dahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, List WF. The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2002 Mar;94(3):591-6; table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11867381 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMT2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Peripheral Regional Blockade and EMG
NCT06982027 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Regional Anesthesia EMG Study
NCT06287151 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA