Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-15
2020-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Tof Cuff for Perioperative Neuromuscular Transmission
NCT03117387
The Precision and Arm-to-Arm Variation of Mechanomyography and Acceleromyography for Monitoring of Neuromuscular Block
NCT00472121
Comparing Train-of-Four Recovery in the Adductor Pollicis Versus the Adductor Digiti Minimi in Elective Surgery Patients
NCT06467448
Comparison of AMG and EMG to Avoid Residual Paralysis After General Anesthesia
NCT02126852
Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Using Kine-myography vs Electromyography.
NCT05992090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are different methods of quantitative monitoring of NMB. The TOF-CUFF monitor uses a method based on a traditional pressure cuff that incorporates stimulation electrodes. The placement of the cuff which aligns the stimulation electrodes on the path of the brachial plexus at the humeral level allows to evaluate the muscular response evoked from the changes in the cuff pressure, generated by the muscular contraction after the electrical stimulus. Its main advantage is that monitoring of the NMB is included within the pressure cuff itself, which is always used in any anesthetic act. Then, when the pressure cuff is placed, monitoring of the NMB is easily established. This specific design facilitates the task of anesthesiologists because they do not have to perform any additional preparation for the monitoring of NMB.
The TOF-CUFF monitor has been validated regarding the mechanomyography, which is considered the gold-standard for the monitoring of NMB. The main objective of the study is to compare the values of NMB measured with the TOF-CUFF monitor with NMB values measured with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor during the pharmacologically induced NMB and evaluate the degree of equivalence in different situations. Secondary objective is to verify that the design for joint monitoring of the NMB and NIBP in the TOF-CUFF monitor does not affect the independent measure of the two variables.
Prospective, single-center, open and controlled observational clinical study. The study is aimed to be conducted with 40 patients aged between 18 and 65 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control samples
For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with GE CARESCAPE B450 monitor (E-NMT module).
No interventions assigned to this group
Case samples
For each case, neuromuscular measurements gathered with TOFCuff monitor.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who give their written informed consent
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia that according to the anesthetic plan muscle relaxants will be administered
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who present any of the contraindications for the devices used in the study
* Patients who are participating or have participated in a clinical trial during the 4 weeks prior to inclusion
* Women of childbearing age who do not use effective contraceptive methods, pregnant women, with suspicion of pregnancy or breast-feeding
* Patients with the following criteria: upper limb peripheral vascular pathologies, a difficult airway, myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular diseases, use of medication that may alter NMT
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Servei Central d'Anestesiologia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lorena Silva Gil
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lorena Silva Gil, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Servei d'Anestesiologia Centro Médico Teknon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Médico Teknon
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):110-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
Veiga Ruiz G, Garcia Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreno Caparros M, Garcia Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitoring intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure with one device (TOF-Cuff): A comparative study with mechanomyography and invasive blood pressure. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Dec;64(10):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Jun 27. English, Spanish.
Rodiera J, Serradell A, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Aliaga L. The cuff method: a pilot study of a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00777.x.
Checketts MR, Jenkins B, Pandit JJ. Implications of the 2015 AAGBI recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:3-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13736. No abstract available.
Dahaba AA, von Klobucar F, Rehak PH, List WF. The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2002 Mar;94(3):591-6; table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NMT2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.