The Retroclavicular Approach for Regional Anesthesia of the Upper Limb in Obese Patients
NCT ID: NCT02086643
Last Updated: 2015-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Retroclavicular Approach for Regional Anesthesia
NCT01852396
Retroclavicular Approach vs Infraclavicular Approach for Plexic Bloc Anesthesia of the Upper Limb
NCT02913625
Retroclavicular Approach vs Infraclavicular Approach for Brachial Plexus Block in Obese Patients
NCT02990702
Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Influence of Obesity
NCT02033265
Perineural Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Influence of Obesity on Block Performance Time, Failure Rate and Incidence of Acute Complications (Observational Study)
NCT02825888
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The retroclavicular approach is a variant to this classical technique. Ultrasound probe is positioned initially below the clavicle in a manner similar to the classic approach but is then rotated in a clockwise fashion (right arm) or counter-clockwise fashion (left arm) for about 25-35 degrees. The puncture site is just behind the clavicle at the most lateral point available. If initial entry point is optimal, needle direction is then parallel to ultrasound probe. The final aim and position of block needle is identical to classical approach. Entry point ensures a parallel alignment of the needle and the ultrasound beam, thus enabling almost perfect visualization of both artery, cords and block needle. This is turn optimizes safety, rapidity of technique, efficiency and efficacy.
It is recognized that regional anesthesia is more difficult to perform in obese patients. Anatomic landmarks are harder to localize in this population and ultrasound guidance is more difficult because of the attenuation of the ultrasound beam by adipose tissue. The complication rate of regional techniques is also reported to be higher in the obese patient population.
Since the retroclavicular variant of the infraclavicular approach for the anesthesia of the brachial plexus offers a better needle visualisation, we believe that this technique can be used successfully in the obese patient population with a low complication rate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retroclavicular block
Retroclavicular block
Retroclavicular block
Retroclavicular ultrasound guided nerve block with total injection of 40 ml of a mixture of 20 ml ropivacaine 0,5% (5 mg/ml) + 20 ml mepivacaine 1,5% (15 mg/ml) + epinephrine 1 : 400 000 (2,5 mcg/ml). Incremental injections of 5 ml separated by an aspiration test.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retroclavicular block
Retroclavicular ultrasound guided nerve block with total injection of 40 ml of a mixture of 20 ml ropivacaine 0,5% (5 mg/ml) + 20 ml mepivacaine 1,5% (15 mg/ml) + epinephrine 1 : 400 000 (2,5 mcg/ml). Incremental injections of 5 ml separated by an aspiration test.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years and older
* Ability to consent
* American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 to 3
* BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Abnormal anatomy at the site of infection
* Coagulopathy
* Severe Pulmonary Disease
* Preexisting neurological symptom(s) in the operated arm
* Pregnant patients
* Patients weighing less than 50 kg
* Allergy to amide type local anesthetics
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Université de Sherbrooke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pablo Echave
Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pablo Echave, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université de Sherbrooke
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-175
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.