Compare Continuous Gastrocnemius Plane Block With Intravenous Analgesia After Foot and Ankle Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05463809
Last Updated: 2022-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-14
2024-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Onset Time of Nerve Block: A Comparison of Two Injection Locations in Patients Having Lower Leg/ Foot Surgery
NCT01542840
Popliteal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Ankle and Hindfoot Reconstruction
NCT02440542
High Ankle Block Versus Regional Block for Acute Pain Control After Ankle Surgery
NCT03894098
Continuous Distal Adductor Canal Block With Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration Versus Continuous Distal Adductor Canal Block Alone for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05427019
High Ankle Block in Ankle Fractures
NCT04292691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous clinical studies have shown that a single gastrocnemius muscle plane block can provide good postoperative analgesia after 16 hours for patients with foot and ankle surgery, significantly reduce the dose of opioids, and see no nerve injury.
Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that continuous gastrocnemius plane block could provide more lasting analgesia in patients undergoing foot-ankle surgery.
This clinical study uses a single-center, randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled trial design, divided into screening period, treatment period and follow-up periods.
Patients were randomized into two groups, the ropivacaine group and the control group.The venous access was open after home invasion and was routinely monitored electrocardiogram(ECG), non-invasive blood pressure(NBP) ,oxygen saturation(SpO2),bispectral index(BIS). General anesthesia was performed.
Induction of anesthesia: propofol 1 milligram / kg, cis atracurium 0.2 milligrams / kilogram, sufentanil 10 micrograms ,remifentanil at 1.5 micrograms/ kilogram. Anesthesia maintenance: Propofol and sevoflurane static aspiration compound bispectral index was maintained at 40\~60, remifentanil 0.3\~0.4 μg / kg/min intravenous pump, and additional cis atracurium was added according to neuromuscular monitoring. In the postoperative ropivacaine group, the patient took a lateral decubitus position, and underwent a gastrocnemius plane block and catheterization under ultrasound guidance to connect a disposable electron infusion pump. (Formula of 0.125% ropivacaine of 300 milliliters, background dose of 3.0 milliliters / hour, patient controlled analgesia(PCA) dose of 8 milliliters , and locking time of 25 minutes). The control group received intravenous oxycodone titrated according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and received no background dose of oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump for analgesia (single dose 1milligram, locking time 5minutes, 4 hours limit 12milligrams). All patients were given 50 milligrams of fluorophenol ester intravenously. Remedial analgesia: if patient controlled analgesia still can not tolerate the pain and numerical rating scale(NRS) ≥4, can be given intravenously oxycodone was done 2milligrams, separated by over 3 minutes, until numerical rating scale(NRS) ≤3.
Record: block range of 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48hours and numerical rating scale(NRS) score during rest and exercise; time of first pressing of the analgesic pump; times of controlled analgesia (PCA); 0-4 hours, 0-8 hours, 0-16 hours, 0-24 hours, 8-16 hours, 16-24 hours, 24-32 hours, 32-40 hours,40-48 hours pain intensity-time curve (AUC); dose and times of remedial analgesic administration; Records: affected limb muscle strength and paresthesia, length of hospitalization, time of first ambulation, nausea and vomiting, neurological complications, patient satisfaction, physician and nurse satisfaction, etc.
The patient had open venous access after home invasion and was routinely monitored for electrocardiogram(ECG), non-invasive blood pressure(NBP) ,oxygen saturation(SpO2) and bispectral index(BIS). Induction and maintenance were performed according to a uniform anesthesia protocol. Postoperatively, the block was performed by the same anesthesiologist familiar with the ultrasound-guided nerve block. Various study indicators and data were collected by the same anesthesiologist who was not aware of the grouping situation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group: Ropivacaine-controlled analgesia pump
A single injection of 0.375% Ropivacaine 15 milliliters was given into the common peroneal nerve, medial sural cutaneous nerve, and lateral sural cutaneous nerve. Than,a catheter was placed in the gastrocnemius plane, and a 0.125% ropivacaine-controlled analgesic pump was applied.(The formulation was 0.125% ropivacaine at 300 milliliters, with a background dose of 3 milliliters/hours, a patient-controlled analgesia(PCA) dose of 8 milliliters, and a locking time of 25 minutes.)
Continuous Gastrocnemius plane block with ropivacaine
After extubation, the patient was routinely monitored for his vital signs.The nerve block operation was performed by the same doctor: let the patient take the lateral decubitus position, use the ultrasonic high-frequency array probe under the popliteal socket to scan the sciatic nerve, move the probe down to find the tibial nerve and the common peroneal nerve, and then a single injection of 0.375% Ropivacaine 15milliliters was given into the common peroneal nerve, medial sural cutaneous nerve, and lateral sural cutaneous nerve. Then avoid common peroneal nerve, use the indwelling needle (16GA 3.25 IN), and put the catheter after saline expansion.
Control group: oxycodone-controlled analgesia pump
No treatment was given preoperatively, and postoperative oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA). After awakening, intravenous oxycodone was titrated according to numerical rating scale(NRS) score, providing analgesia without background dose of oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) pump (single dose 1 milligram, locking time 5 minutes, 14 hours limit 12 milligrams)
oxycodone
The patient was revived and received intravenous oxycodone titration according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and was treated with no background dose of oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump for analgesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Gastrocnemius plane block with ropivacaine
After extubation, the patient was routinely monitored for his vital signs.The nerve block operation was performed by the same doctor: let the patient take the lateral decubitus position, use the ultrasonic high-frequency array probe under the popliteal socket to scan the sciatic nerve, move the probe down to find the tibial nerve and the common peroneal nerve, and then a single injection of 0.375% Ropivacaine 15milliliters was given into the common peroneal nerve, medial sural cutaneous nerve, and lateral sural cutaneous nerve. Then avoid common peroneal nerve, use the indwelling needle (16GA 3.25 IN), and put the catheter after saline expansion.
oxycodone
The patient was revived and received intravenous oxycodone titration according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and was treated with no background dose of oxycodone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump for analgesia.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient informed consent was obtained
* Age 18 to 65 years Sex is not limited
* American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)Ⅰ\~Ⅲ level
* Body Mass Index(BMI)18\~28kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Abnormal coagulation function
* Local anesthetic allergy
* Severe cardiopulmonary disease
* Liver and renal insufficiency
* Medical history of chronic pain
* Long-term use of sedative and analgesic drugs
* Communication disorders
* The operation time exceeded 3 hours
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Provenzano DA, Viscusi ER, Adams SB Jr, Kerner MB, Torjman MC, Abidi NA. Safety and efficacy of the popliteal fossa nerve block when utilized for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2002 May;23(5):394-9. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300504.
Sun Li, Wei Jinju. Patient VAS was scored by ultrasound-guided continuous sciatic nerve block during foot surgery And the effect analysis of morphine dosage. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2019,32 (4): 523-524.
Anderson JG, Bohay DR, Maskill JD, Gadkari KP, Hearty TM, Braaksma W, Padley MA, Weaver KT. Complications After Popliteal Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Oct;36(10):1138-43. doi: 10.1177/1071100715589741. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Zhang Jinfang, Li Yimei. Ultrasound-guided continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. The World's Latest Medical Information Abstract, 2019,19 (68): 1-3.
Qiu Wen, Yu Bin. Randomized controlled study of continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block analgesia and intravenous analgesia after foot and ankle surgery. Journal of Tongji University (Medical edition), 2 018,39 (02): 99-102.
Gartke K, Portner O, Taljaard M. Neuropathic symptoms following continuous popliteal block after foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Apr;33(4):267-74. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0267.
Bai Shu order, should be dajun et al. descriptive anatomy. The People's Health Publishing House. 353-357.
Dong Guangyu, Huang Bingzhe, Zhang Hanyang, Chang Fei. Ankle joint block treatment. The Electronic Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2017, 4(3):59.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Han Liu
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.