High Ankle Block in Ankle Fractures

NCT ID: NCT04292691

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the herein presented double-blinded is to compare the effectiveness of the high foot block against placebo infiltration in simple, uni- and bimalleolar ankle fractures.

Included will be all adult patients (\>18a) treated surgically at our department. The standard peri-operative procedure at our clinic will no be altered but the additional high ankle block. The intraoperative opioid requirement, the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS) and the postoperative opioid requirement will be assessed and compared between the two groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ankle fractures were among the most common injuries of the lower extremity. Peri-operative, multimodal pain therapy is of great importance in the surgical treatment of those injuries. Whereas simple (uni- and bimalleolar) ankle fractures are covered peri-operatively by oral pain medication and Piritramid-PCA (PCA=Patient-controlled analgesia), complex, trimalleolar fractures usually receive additional regional pain catheters (femoralis blockade and ischiadicus blockade).

Regional pain catheters have the major downside of motor paresis and are therefore critically discussed. Various studies have explored new techniques for perioperative pain therapy. An established procedure in midfoot and forefoot surgery is the foot block. It can be inserted at different heights around the ankle joint. However, the effectiveness of the high foot block has not yet been investigated for ankle fractures. The aim of the herein presented double-blinded is to compare the effectiveness of the high foot block against placebo infiltration in simple, uni- and bimalleolar ankle fractures.

All patients who are operated on in our department due to a uni- or bimalleolar ankle fracture, who are over 18 years of age and have no serious pre-existing conditions or contraindications to local anaesthesia (LA) are eligible for inclusion.

The perioperative procedure does not change to the current treatment standard at the University Hospital Munich - Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) except for randomization for high foot block or placebo. Both the anesthesia and the postoperative pain therapy correspond to the current treatment standard and are the same for both groups. The intraoperative opioid requirement, the VAS and the postoperative opioid requirement will be assessed.

The data is collected using the RedCap database (#19-177), which has already been reviewed by the ethics committee. The evaluation will be performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Fractures Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blinded, randomised control trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Randomization will be conducted by the Principle Investigator through RedCap. The syringe is prepared under sterile setting in a separate room by a nurse not involved in any further part of the medical treatment. The syringe with unknown content will be handed to the anaesthesiologist performing the anaesthesia. Therefore the anaesthesiologist performing the block as well as the guiding the anaesthesia throughout the surgery does not know what was injected.

The total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalent dose will be automatically drawn from our anaesthesia recording program (NarcoData) and the cumulative morphine milligram equivalent dose use between skin incision and beginning Recovery Room calculated. The patient than receives the Piritramid PCA and the total morphine milligram equivalent dose use will again be drawn automatically from the machine. The VAS Score will be entered by the patient in a tablet.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ropivacaine

A cumulative amount of approx. 40ml ropivacaine 0.5% (≙400mg (2x200mg) ropivacaine) is applied immediately before surgery. They are applied in a ring wall 10 cm cranially of the tip of the medial and lateral malleolus (N. peroneus superficialis (N. cutaneus dorsalis medius et intermedius, N. saphenus, N. suralis), as well as sonographically controlled (N. peroneus profundus and N. suralis)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

40ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

already outlined in the arm/group description

Ringer's Lactate

Analog to the Experimental Arm, but the same amount of Ringer (40ml) will be plicated instead Ropivacaine

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

40ml of Ringer's Lactate

Intervention Type DRUG

already outlined in the arm/group description

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

40ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

already outlined in the arm/group description

Intervention Type DRUG

40ml of Ringer's Lactate

already outlined in the arm/group description

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>17 years and \<71 years
* Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \> 60
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA) \< 4
* Independently mobile without aids before an accident
* Informed consent
* Uni- or bimalleolar (medial and lateral malleolus) ankle fractures requiring surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years; \>70 years
* GFR \< 60
* ASA \> 3
* Trimalleolar fractures or fractures necessitating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the posterior malleolus
* Not able to walk without aids (stick, rollator, etc.)
* Allergy to local anesthetics or drugs of the postOP pain regime
* Peripheral polyneuropathy
* Peripheral artery disease (PAD) grade IV°
* Dementia
* Depression, anxiety disorders or sleep disorders 18
* Pregnancy
* Denial of study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sebastian. F. Baumbach

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sebastian F Baumbach, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sebastian F Baumbach, MD

Role: CONTACT

0049894400519474

Hans Polzer, MD

Role: CONTACT

004989440052511

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.