Closed-Loop O2 Use During High Flow Oxygen Treatment of Critical Care Adult Patients (CLOUDHFOT)
NCT ID: NCT06374589
Last Updated: 2025-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-21
2026-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As hyperoxia is considered not desirable \[Barbateskovic et al, 2019\] during any oxygen therapy, the inspired O2 concentration is usually adapted to a pre-set SpO2 target-range of 92-96% in patients without hypercapnia risk, and of 88-92% if a risk of hypercapnia is present \[O'Driscoll et al, 2017; Beasley et al, 2015\]. In most institutions, the standard of care is to manually adapt the FiO2, although patients frequently have a SpO2 value outside the target range.
A new closed loop oxygen controller designed for HFNO was recently developed (Hamilton Medical, Bonaduz, Switzerland). The clinician sets SpO2 targets, and the software option adjusts FiO2 to keep SpO2 within the target ranges. The software option offers some alarms on low and high SpO2 and high FiO2. Given the capability, on the one hand, to quickly increase FiO2 in patients developing sudden and profound hypoxia, and, on the other hand, of automatically preventing hyperoxia in patients improving their oxygenation, such a system could be particularly useful in patients treated with HFNO.
A short-term (4 hours vs 4 hours) crossover study indicated that this technique improves the time spent within SpO2 pre-defined target for ICU patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy \[Roca et al, 2022\]. Due to its simplicity, HFNO is increasingly used outside the ICU during transport and in the Emergency Room (ER). This environment poses specific challenges, as patients may deteriorate very quickly and depending on patient's flow, healthcare providers can easily be overwhelmed. We thus propose to evaluate closed loop controlled HFNO in ER patients.
The hypothesis of the study is that closed loop oxygen control increases the time spent within clinically targeted SpO2 ranges and decreases the time spent outside clinical target SpO2 ranges as compared to manual oxygen control in ER patients treated with HFNO.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Closed-Loop O2 Use During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Of Pediatric Patients
NCT05714527
Closed-loop Oxygen Control for High Flow Nasal Therapy
NCT04965844
HFNO in Pneumonia Patients Presenting With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT05809089
A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Immunocompromised Patients
NCT02739451
The Edi Level and Cardiopulmonary Function Between HHHFNC and Unheated Humidified High-Flow Oxygen Mask in COPD
NCT03811158
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Close-loop FiO2 Controller
Six hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered will be automatically titrated based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.
Closed-loop FiO2 controller
Close-loop FiO2 controller software option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range. When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the FiO2 setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.
Conventional
Six hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered will be manually titrated by clinician based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.
Conventional
Six hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered will be manually titrated by clinician based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Closed-loop FiO2 controller
Close-loop FiO2 controller software option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range. When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the FiO2 setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.
Conventional
Six hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered will be manually titrated by clinician based on SpO2 values obtained from the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Requiring NHFO
* Requiring FiO2 ≥ 30% to keep SpO2 in the target ranges defined by the clinician
* Aged over 18 years
* Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case that the patient is unable to consent, after full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation
* In case that the consent is given by the relative, patient consent will be requested as soon as the patient will be able to provide informed written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Hemodynamic instability defined as a need of continuous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine \> 1 mg/h
* Low quality on the SpO2 measurement using finger and ear sensor (quality index below 60% on the Massimo SpO2 sensor, which is displayed by a red or orange color bar)
* Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.30)
* Pregnant woman
* Patients deemed at high risk for need of mechanical ventilation within the next 12 hours
* Chronic or acute dyshemoglobinemia: methemoglobin, CO poisoning, sickle cell disease
* Tracheotomized patient
* Formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support
* Patient under guardianship
* Patient deprived of liberties
* Patient included in another interventional research study under consent
* Patient already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure
* Apparition of a persistent low quality SpO2 signal
* Need for an emergent intubation
* Discharge from ER
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hamilton Medical AG
INDUSTRY
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ramazan Guven, Associate prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Basaksehir Cam Sakura city Hospital, Istanbul
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Dr.Suat Seren Chest Diseasees Hospital
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sandal O, Ceylan G, Topal S, Hepduman P, Colak M, Novotni D, Soydan E, Karaarslan U, Atakul G, Schultz MJ, Agin H. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygenation in pediatric patients under high-flow nasal oxygen-A randomized crossover study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 16;9:1046902. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1046902. eCollection 2022.
Roca O, Caritg O, Santafe M, Ramos FJ, Pacheco A, Garcia-de-Acilu M, Ferrer R, Schultz MJ, Ricard JD. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w.
Dijkman KP, Goos TG, Dieleman JP, Mohns T, van Pul C, Andriessen P, Kroon AA, Reiss IK, Niemarkt HJ. Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation in Preterm Infants: A Two-Center Feasibility Study. Neonatology. 2023;120(2):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000527539. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
O'Driscoll BR, Kirton L, Weatherall M, Bakerly ND, Turkington P, Cook J, Beasley R. Effect of a lower target oxygen saturation range on the risk of hypoxaemia and elevated NEWS2 scores at a university hospital: a retrospective study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Feb 29;11(1):e002019. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202303123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.