The Effects of EndoActivator on Postoperative Pain and Root Canal Treatment Success
NCT ID: NCT06339905
Last Updated: 2024-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Irrigation Activation on Clinical Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment
NCT03990584
Effect of Sonic Activation of Irrigant on Post Operative Pain After Root Canal Treatment
NCT07062419
"Effect of Sonic Activation Assisted Irrigation and Apical Enlargement on Postoperative Endodontic Pain"
NCT04314908
Influence of Sonic Activation of Root Sealers on Post-Operative Pain
NCT06403293
Evaluation of Different Root Canal Irrigation Techniques
NCT07106320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methodology: In this clinical trial, root-canal treatment was performed on 140 posterior teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. After routine canal preparation, patients were assigned to either a control group treated using conventional needle irrigation (CNI) without activation or to sonic irrigation activation with EndoActivator. All treatment was completed in a single visit. Patients provided self-assessments of the severity of postoperative pain at 1, 2,3 and 7 days using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and Wong Baker Face Scale. Patients were recalled at 12 months for clinical and radiographic examinations. Periapical healing was evaluated using a periapical index (PAI), with scores of 1 or 2 considered to represent treatment success and scores of 3, 4, or 5 to represent treatment failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with differences of P \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sonic Activation with EndoActivator
Sonic irrigation was performed using an EndoActivator sonic handpiece (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA). A suitable-size activator tip was selected and loosely placed at 2 mm from working length, and the device was operated at 10,000 cycles/min using a pumping action to move the tip to produce vertical strokes of 2-3 mm.
Sonic Activation with EndoActivator
sonic activation
Conventional needle irrigation (control)
Conventional needle irrigation was performed with short, in-and-out vertical strokes of 2-3 mm at a rate of approximately 100 strokes per minute.
Control Needle Irrigation
control group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sonic Activation with EndoActivator
sonic activation
Control Needle Irrigation
control group
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being systemically healthy
* Having posterior teeth (molar or premolar) with chronic apical periodontitis lesion (PAI≥3)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with complicated systemic disease (ASA 3 - 6)
* Teeth with open apex
* Teeth having curvature more than 20 degree
* Not having enough tooth structure to be isolated with rubber dam
* Patients with severe periodontal defects or deep periodontal pockets (probing depth\> 4 mm)
* A history of taking analgesics 12 hours ago or antibiotics 1 month ago
* Patients who cannot come to control sessions
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
yeldaerdem
Director, Clinical Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Seyda Ersahan, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Esenler, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Orstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J. 1996 May;29(3):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01361.x.
Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J. 2015 Aug;41(2):78-87. doi: 10.1111/aej.12076. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
Swimberghe RCD, Buyse R, Meire MA, De Moor RJG. Efficacy of different irrigation technique in simulated curved root canals. Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Aug;36(6):1317-1322. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03263-8. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
Brito PR, Souza LC, Machado de Oliveira JC, Alves FR, De-Deus G, Lopes HP, Siqueira JF Jr. Comparison of the effectiveness of three irrigation techniques in reducing intracanal Enterococcus faecalis populations: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.001.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10840098-772.02-5564
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.