Efficacy of Apical Preparation With Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in Reducing Intracanal Bacteria

NCT ID: NCT07005219

Last Updated: 2025-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-24

Study Completion Date

2024-11-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates intracanal bacterial load in molar teeth with chronic apical periodontitis before and after root canal shaping with two different apical enlargement sizes and ultrasonic irrigation activation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigated the effect of different apical enlargement sizes and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) on the bacterial load in the mesial roots of mandibular molars diagnosed with chronic apical periodontitis. The study was conducted at Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Dentistry, Endodontics Clinic, and included 24 patients who required primary root canal treatment and exhibited clinical and radiographic signs of chronic apical periodontitis.

Participants were randomly assigned to two groups (n=12 each). In Group 1, root canal shaping was performed using a One Curve Mini #25/0.4 rotary file. In Group 2, shaping was performed using a One Curve Mini #35/0.4 rotary file. In both groups, passive ultrasonic irrigation was applied using the VDW Ultra device with an IRRI S 21/25 ultrasonic tip. The irrigation protocol consisted of three 20-second cycles using 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) per cycle. The ultrasonic tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length without contacting the canal walls.

Bacterial samples were collected from the mesial root canals during the treatment. The bacterial load was quantified using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), a highly sensitive and precise molecular technique that allows absolute quantification of bacterial DNA. This method was chosen because it enables accurate detection of bacterial reduction following the interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Periodontitis Root Canal Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Apical Enlargement with One Curve Mini #25/0.4 (Minimal Invasive Shaping)

Intervention:

* Root canal shaping using One Curve Mini #25/0.4 rotary file.
* Irrigation with 3% NaOCl.
* Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) using IRRI S 21/25 tip on VDW Ultra device.
* 3 cycles of ultrasonic activation (each 20 seconds, 1 ml NaOCl per cycle).
* Ultrasonic tip placed 2 mm short of working length, without contacting canal walls.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal shaping with One Curve Mini #25/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants in this group underwent root canal shaping using a One Curve Mini #25/0.4 rotary file. After mechanical preparation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) was performed using a VDW Ultra device with an IRRI S 21/25 ultrasonic tip. Irrigation was activated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in three 20-second cycles, using 1 ml per cycle. The ultrasonic tip was placed 2 mm short of the working length without contacting canal walls.

Apical Enlargement with One Curve Mini #35/0.4 (Conventional Shaping)

Intervention:

* Root canal shaping using One Curve Mini #35/0.4 rotary file.
* Irrigation with 3% NaOCl.
* Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) using IRRI S 21/25 tip on VDW Ultra device.
* 3 cycles of ultrasonic activation (each 20 seconds, 1 ml NaOCl per cycle).
* Ultrasonic tip placed 2 mm short of working length, without contacting canal walls.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal shaping with One Curve Mini #35/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants in this group underwent root canal shaping using a One Curve Mini #35/0.4 rotary file. The same passive ultrasonic irrigation protocol was applied as in Arm 1, using 3% NaOCl in three 20-second cycles with 1 ml per cycle. The ultrasonic tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length without contacting the canal walls.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Root canal shaping with One Curve Mini #25/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation

Participants in this group underwent root canal shaping using a One Curve Mini #25/0.4 rotary file. After mechanical preparation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) was performed using a VDW Ultra device with an IRRI S 21/25 ultrasonic tip. Irrigation was activated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in three 20-second cycles, using 1 ml per cycle. The ultrasonic tip was placed 2 mm short of the working length without contacting canal walls.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal shaping with One Curve Mini #35/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation

Participants in this group underwent root canal shaping using a One Curve Mini #35/0.4 rotary file. The same passive ultrasonic irrigation protocol was applied as in Arm 1, using 3% NaOCl in three 20-second cycles with 1 ml per cycle. The ultrasonic tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length without contacting the canal walls.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a non-contributory medical history
* must have an asymptomatic mandibular molar with periapical lesions of\>2.0x2.0 mm around the mesial roots
* must be diagnosed as chronic apical periodontitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with acute clinical symptoms
* Teeth with previous root canal treatment
* non-restorable teeth
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medipol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Melike Yavuz

Director, Clinical Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Melike Yavuz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medipol University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Medipol University

Istanbul, Esenler, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10840098-772.02-6513

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.