A Study to Compare Various Root Canal Cleaning Devices Based on Cavitation,Ultrasonic and Conventional Methods.

NCT ID: NCT06005545

Last Updated: 2023-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

109 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-04

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of various root canal cleaning devices based on the principle of cavitation, ultrasonics, and conventional methods in a normal healthy adult population aged between 18 to 75 years requiring root canal treatment.

The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Effectiveness of the cleaning mechanism
* Evaluate the safety of use of the device. Participants will be provided root canal treatment. Participants will be asked to record their post-operative pain levels in a Patient Pain diary. The healing rate of the lesion will be examined at follow-up visits using intraoral X-rays. At the end of the study, a statistical analysis of the clinical outcomes of the root canal treatment will be examined and evaluated in every group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study title: "A Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness in Root Canal Debridement using Inertial Cavitation Device vs Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Conventional Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial".

Study Design: This is a prospective, 3-arm randomized, non-blinded, single-center pivotal clinical investigation, performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Endoclean device with 2 comparator arms.

Primary objective: To test the effectiveness of the Endoclean device for root canal debridement up to 12-month follow-up.

Secondary objective: To test the extended effectiveness and safety of the Endoclean device up to a 24-month follow-up.

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inclusion Criteria

•Patients aged between 18-75 years with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification 1 and 2.

ASA 1: A normal healthy patient. Example: Fit, non-obese BMI (Body mass index) under 30, a non-smoking patient with good exercise tolerance.

ASA 2: A patient with mild systemic disease. Example: Patient with no functional limitations and a well-controlled disease (e.g., treated hypertension, obesity with BMI under 35, frequent social drinker, or cigarette smoker).
* Patients who agreed to participate and who have signed the informed consent.
* Patients presenting with symptomatic and/or asymptomatic apical periodontitis and radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis in anterior or posterior teeth larger than 1.5 mm in diameter.
* Mature tooth with closed apices
* Tooth that has never been treated with root canal therapy.
2. Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients, who have pre-existing health or oral conditions that placed them at risk during the trial.
* Patients with generalized untreated periodontal disease.
* Patients with a history of analgesic intake within the past 3 days or antibiotics in the last 1 month.
* Uncooperative patients
* Teeth with immature apices, root resorption, or requiring extensive prosthetic rehabilitation.
* Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
* Teeth with insufficient periodontal support
* Teeth with poor prognosis, for example due to deep root caries, large root resorption or open apex cases
* Fractured teeth
* Local anatomical factors such as an inaccessible root end
* Presence of fractured instrument in the root canal
* Pregnant women
* Patients unable to understand the study procedure.

Number of Participants:

Total number of participants = 109 subjects Arm 1: 40 subjects Arm 2: 40 subjects Arm 3: 29 subjects Test device: Endoclean (Lumendo AG): hydraulic cavitation cleaning device Control device 1: Passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) Control device 2: Rotary files with standard NaOCl irrigation Study duration: 2-3 years The results of the Endoclean group shall be compared to data gathered from the comparator device groups and results shall be presented in the clinical investigation report.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apical Periodontitis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Root Canal Treatment Endodontic Treatment Root Canal Debridement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective, 3- arm randomized, non-blinded, single center pivotal clinical investigation, performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Endoclean device with 2 comparator arms.

Arm 1: Passive ultrasonic irrigation group (PUI); shaping up to WL with 25.06, Arm 2: Endoclean (EC) group; shaping up to WL with 20.06; EC application tip kept 3mm short of WL, irrigation protocol with NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite) Arm 3: Conventional group; shaping up to WL of 25.06, irrigation protocol with NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation group (PUI)

Arm 1: Passive ultrasonic irrigation group (PUI); shaping up to WL with 25.06,

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Passive ultrasonic irrigation is the current golden standard in root canal cleaning and irrigation devices. It is used after root canal shaping using manual or rotary instruments. It uses sodium hypochlorite which is mobilized in the canal using ultrasonic non-cutting tips to clean, debride, disinfect, and prepare the root canal for obturation.

Endoclean group (EC)

Arm 2: Endoclean (EC) group; shaping up to WL with 20.06; EC application tip kept 3mm short of WL, irrigation protocol with NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoclean (EC) group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endoclean is a novel device that uses hydraulic inertial cavitation with the help of pressure and saline solution to debride the root canal after minimal shaping using manual or rotary shaping instruments. It is used to effectively clean, debride and prepare the root canal before obturation in the root canal treatment procedure.

Conventional Group

Arm 3: Conventional group; shaping up to WL of 25.06, irrigation protocol with NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional root canal preparation uses manual or rotary files along with manual irrigation using syringes and irrigant solutions like sodium hypochlorite or EDTA to clean, debride and prepare the root canal for obturation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) group

Passive ultrasonic irrigation is the current golden standard in root canal cleaning and irrigation devices. It is used after root canal shaping using manual or rotary instruments. It uses sodium hypochlorite which is mobilized in the canal using ultrasonic non-cutting tips to clean, debride, disinfect, and prepare the root canal for obturation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endoclean (EC) group

Endoclean is a novel device that uses hydraulic inertial cavitation with the help of pressure and saline solution to debride the root canal after minimal shaping using manual or rotary shaping instruments. It is used to effectively clean, debride and prepare the root canal before obturation in the root canal treatment procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional group

Conventional root canal preparation uses manual or rotary files along with manual irrigation using syringes and irrigant solutions like sodium hypochlorite or EDTA to clean, debride and prepare the root canal for obturation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultrasonic group Cavitation group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

•Patients aged between 18-75 years with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification 1 and 2.

ASA 1: A normal healthy patient. Example: Fit, non-obese BMI (Body mass index) under 30, a non-smoking patient with good exercise tolerance.

ASA 2: A patient with mild systemic disease. Example: Patient with no functional limitations and a well-controlled disease (e.g., treated hypertension, obesity with BMI under 35, frequent social drinker, or cigarette smoker).

* Patients who agreed to participate and who have signed the informed consent.
* Patients presenting with symptomatic and/or asymptomatic apical periodontitis and radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis in anterior or posterior teeth larger than 1.5 mm in diameter.
* Mature tooth with closed apices
* Tooth that has never been treated with root canal therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients, who have pre-existing health or oral conditions that placed them at risk during the trial.
* Patients with generalized untreated periodontal disease.
* Patients with a history of analgesic intake within the past 3 days or antibiotics in the last 1 month.
* Uncooperative patients
* Teeth with immature apices, root resorption, or requiring extensive prosthetic rehabilitation.
* Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
* Teeth with insufficient periodontal support
* Teeth with poor prognosis, for example due to deep root caries, large root resorption or open apex cases
* Fractured teeth
* Local anatomical factors such as an inaccessible root end.
* Presence of fractured instrument in the root canal
* Pregnant women
* Patients unable to understand the study procedure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lumendo AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

İstanbul Medipol Universitesi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

Istanbul, Unkapanı, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tan Fırat Eyüboglu Assoc. Prof.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +90 530 463 60 59

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tan Firat EYÜBOĞLU, DDS, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC_5301_V1.0_CIP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id