Effect of Different Apical Actions on Local Inflammatory Mediators and Pain
NCT ID: NCT06760312
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. How the different apical actions of endodontic motors influence the pain and inflammatory mediator release from the periapical region of related tooth?
2. Does the perceived pain differ among the used apical action methods after the root canal preparation?
3. Are the perceived pain and local pain mediator levels coherent?
Participants will:
Attend to the root canal treatment in the endodontics clinic. The treatment will be two visits.
Answer the Visual Analog Scale questionnaire on day 0 (first appt.) and Day 3 (second appt.) Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use an anti-inflammatory drug.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Apical Patency on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment
NCT07233590
Can the Different Instruments Used ın Root Canal Treatment Have an Effect on Postoperative Pain?
NCT05927025
Evaluation of Different Root Canal Irrigation Techniques
NCT07106320
Effect of Different Apex Locators on Postoperative Pain in Endodontic Retreatment of Single-Rooted Teeth: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
NCT06964490
Microbial Load After Apical Enlargement in Asymptomatic Teeth With Periapical Lesion
NCT06035185
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will include patients aged 18-49 years who present to the İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Department of Endodontics, requiring root canal treatment for vital, lesion-free mandibular first and second molars. Patients with systemic diseases will be excluded. The study will involve 66 patients. The sample size was calculated according to the effect size of 0,25 recommended by Cohen (1988).
Pre-Treatment Assessment:
* Patients will be asked about spontaneous pain and percussion pain related to the affected tooth prior to the session.
* These pain levels will be recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Group Allocation:
* After rubber dam isolation and access cavity preparation, patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups using a four-sided die.
* Each group will consist of 22 patients and will undergo root canal shaping using an endomotor with one of the following techniques:
1. Continuous Rotation
2. Apical Reverse
3. Apical Slow-Down
Questionnaire:
Patients will be given a pen and will be asked to mark the current and percussion-provoked pain of the related tooth by a numbered linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment on Day 0 and Day 3.
Root Canal Shaping:
1. Working Length Determination: Establish the working length and create a glide path using a #10 K-file.
2. Instrumentation Sequence: Enlarge the canals sequentially using rotary files of sizes 15.04, 20.04, 25.06, 30.06, and 35.06.
3. Irrigation: Use 2 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for irrigation after each file change.
Sample Collection (First Session):
* After completing the first session:
* Rinse the canals with distilled water.
* Remove remaining liquid with #45 paper points.
* Insert sterile #20.02 paper points into the canals and leave them for 30 seconds to collect periapical exudates.
* Collect three samples per canal. Cut the apical 5 mm of the paper points and place them in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes for storage at -80°C.
* The canals will then be rinsed again with 2.5% NaOCl. Patients will be dismissed without using intra-canal medication and instructed to return for the filling session after three days. Patients will be advised to take 800 mg ibuprofen if they experience pain. The medication use will be documented.
Second Session:
* The questionnaire will be held again with the VAS scores and percussion sensivity.
* After local anesthesia the intermediate restorative material is removed and root canal irrigation with distilled water.
* Working length is confirmed again with a file. Collect three additional samples per canal using #20.02 paper points as in the first session.
* Proceed to finalize the root canal treatment.
Final Root Canal Treatment:
1. Perform the final irrigation using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA.
2. Fit gutta-percha cones. 35.06 cone or fitting .02 tapered cones will be selected as the master cone according to the anatomy and fit.
3. Fill the canals using a resin-based root canal sealer with lateral condensation utilizing #25 spreader and accessory #20.02 gutta-percha cones.
4. After cutting the excess gutta-percha, clean the cavity and complete the treatment with composite resin restoration.
Sample Handling:
* All collected samples will be stored in a -80°C freezer for biochemical analysis. The analysis will be based on ELISA tests which will investigate the Substance P, IL-1ß, TNF alpha and IL-6 on Day 0 and Day 3.
Post-Treatment:
* The occlusion will be checked using articulation paper, and adjustments will be made if primary contact is present to ensure no traumatic occlusion.
This standardized protocol ensures consistent data collection and optimal treatment outcomes for all participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Rotation
The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Continuous Rotation" which is the standard and mostly used option in endodontics. Works as a Control group also
Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation
The root canal shaping is conducted with a continuous rotation kinematic.
Apical Reverse
The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Reverse". The motor makes a reverse movement to prevent the file over the working length
Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical reverse kinematic.
Apical Slow-down
The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Apical Slow-down". The motor slows down the rotation to preserve the working length and apical constriction.
Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical slow-down kinematic.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation
The root canal shaping is conducted with a continuous rotation kinematic.
Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical reverse kinematic.
Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical slow-down kinematic.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healthy periodontal tissue with Periapical Index under 2.
* Helathy adjacent teeth.
Exclusion Criteria
* Percussion pain
* Patients who did not consent to a vital pulp therapy
* Radiologically seen open apex, root resorption, calcification
* Periodontal pocket beyond 4mm in length
* Consumption of Antibiotics or Corticosteroids 1 month before the treatment
* Consumption of antiinflammatory drugs 2 days before the treatment
18 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emrah Karataşlıoğlu
Associate Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Mustafa Mert Tulgar, Dmd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Yağmur Kılıç, Dmd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Izmir, Çiğli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cohen, J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-KAE-0080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.