Postoperative Pain After Conservative Root Canal Preparation

NCT ID: NCT06545773

Last Updated: 2024-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-04

Study Completion Date

2024-09-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pain experienced by healthy participants after root canal treatment with small versus large root canal sizes.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Do small and large root canal sizes cause different pain levels?
2. What is the number of painkiller pills taken by each participant?
3. Does small root canal size cause severe pain and facial swelling?

The researcher will perform root canal treatment on lower molar teeth. The researcher will ask about the pain level, painkiller pill number, and swelling on the 6th,12th, 24th, 48th, 72nd hours, and 7th day after the treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Root canal shaping is an essential step for root canal treatment. Necrotic tissues, debris, microorganisms, and organic matter should be removed to clean and disinfect the root canals. Previously, this conventional procedure involved removing excessive dentine from root canals, which weakened the tooth's structural integrity. Due to technological advances, excessive dentine removal is not always necessary. Root canals are claimed to be disinfected despite minimal dentine removal. This concept of treatment is called minimally invasive or conservative root canal treatment.

This study compares postoperative pain after conservative and conventional root canal preparation in healthy participants with necrotic mandibular molars.

Participants will be enrolled after clinical and radiographic examination by an independent endodontist and allocated randomly to conventional or conservative root canal treatment groups. After the root canal treatment, the researcher will send the participants an online questionnaire on the 6th,12th, 24th, 48th, and 72nd hours and 7th day and ask them to rate their pain score according to the Numerical Rating System and the number of painkillers they have taken. The flare-up rate will be determined according to the presence of swelling and severe pain.

An experienced endodontist not involved in the research will monitor eligible participants and clinical treatment protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Diseases Periapical Periodontitis Postoperative Pain Pulp Necroses Flare Up, Symptom

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: ProTaper Next Nickel-Titanium File (PTN)

Root canals will be prepared using the ProTaper Next (PTN) instrument. Coronal flaring will be performed using ProTaper Next XA (accessory) in 300 rpm speed and 2 Ncm torque settings. (The same speed and torque settings will be used for all PTN instruments). The glide path will be prepared with ProGlider (Dentsply, Maillefer). ProTaper Next X1 (17 .04) and then X2 (25 .06) will be advanced in the apical direction using a brushing motion. If debris is observed in the apical part of X2 removed from the root canal after reaching the working length, the shaping of the root canal will be completed, and X3 (30 .07) will not be used. If no debris is observed in the apical part of X2 and the #25 K-File reaches the working length loosely, shaping will be continued with X3. Shaping with ProTaper Next X3 will be done in the same way as X1 and X2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Root Canal Treatment with ProTaper Next Nickel-Titanium File (PTN)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ProTaper Next (Dentsply Sirona) is a rotational system made of a nickel-titanium alloy called M-Wire. It has a rectangular cross-sectional design; thus, only two sides touch the root canal. Five files are available: X1 17/. 04, X2 25/.06, X3 30/. 07, X4 40/.06, and X5 50/.06. This file aggressively removes the coronal dentine of root canals due to its large taper. PTN nickel-titanium systemis used in root canal treatments to debride and shape the root canals.

Group 2: TruNatomy Nickel-Titanium File (TN)

Root canals will be prepared using the TruNatomy (TN) instrument. Coronal flaring will be performed using the Orifice Modifier (20 .08) at a speed of 400 rpm and a torque setting of 1.5 Ncm. (The same speed and torque settings will be used for all TN instruments.) The Orifice Modifier will be advanced up to 3 mm within the root canal. The guide path will be prepared with TruNatomy Glider (17 .02-variable taper).

The TruNatomy Prime (26 .04) file will be used in the canal by moving it apically back and forth 2-3 times and not exceeding 2-5 mm, using a brushing motion. Before proceeding to the TruNatomy Medium (35 .04) file, the debris accumulated in the apical part of the Prime file will be checked. If there is no debris between the apical flutes of the TruNatomy Prime file, shaping will be continued with the TruNatomy Medium file. Shaping with TruNatomy Medium will be done in the same manner as with TN Prime.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Root Canal Treatment withTruNatomy Nickel-Titanium File (TN)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TruNatomy (Dentsply Sirona) is a heat-treated nickel-titanium system that consists of an orifice modifier, glide path, and shaping files. The TruNatomy Small, Prime, and Medium files have sizes of 20/.04, 26/.04, and 35/.04, respectively. It has a rectangular cross-section and a regressive taper. Its slim design allows for a conservative preparation of root canals and the preservation of the coronal dentine. TN nickel-titanium system is used in root canal treatments to debride and shape the root canals.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Root Canal Treatment with ProTaper Next Nickel-Titanium File (PTN)

ProTaper Next (Dentsply Sirona) is a rotational system made of a nickel-titanium alloy called M-Wire. It has a rectangular cross-sectional design; thus, only two sides touch the root canal. Five files are available: X1 17/. 04, X2 25/.06, X3 30/. 07, X4 40/.06, and X5 50/.06. This file aggressively removes the coronal dentine of root canals due to its large taper. PTN nickel-titanium systemis used in root canal treatments to debride and shape the root canals.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root Canal Treatment withTruNatomy Nickel-Titanium File (TN)

TruNatomy (Dentsply Sirona) is a heat-treated nickel-titanium system that consists of an orifice modifier, glide path, and shaping files. The TruNatomy Small, Prime, and Medium files have sizes of 20/.04, 26/.04, and 35/.04, respectively. It has a rectangular cross-section and a regressive taper. Its slim design allows for a conservative preparation of root canals and the preservation of the coronal dentine. TN nickel-titanium system is used in root canal treatments to debride and shape the root canals.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mandibular molar tooth
* asymptomatic apical periodontitis
* pulp necrosis
* periapical lesion index 4 (visible and well-defined periapical lesion)
* absence of pretreatment pain

Exclusion Criteria

* symptomatic apical periodontitis
* preoperative pain
* sinus tract
* pulpitis
* acute apical abscess
* tooth not being in occlusion
* external and internal root resorption
* open apices
* periodontal probing depth of more than 4 mm
* initial apical file larger than 15 and 20 K-File for mesial and distal canals respectively
* chronic illness, analgesic allergy, prior analgesic and antibiotics usage 12 hours and 3 months before treatment, respectively
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cagla Vardar

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Faruk Haznedaroğlu

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Istanbul University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry

Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vardar Korkman C, Haznedaroglu F. Comparison of postoperative pain after instrumentation with TruNatomy or ProTaper Next Ni-Ti systems in mandibular molars with asymptomatic apical periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 13;25(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05895-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40223067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IstanbulU-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.