Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Activation Cycle on Postoperative Pain

NCT ID: NCT06711029

Last Updated: 2024-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One of the most important goals of root canal treatment is to eliminate bacteria from infected canals. However, conventional irrigation methods combined with mechanical preparation applied during root canal treatment may not be sufficient for optimal disinfection. Various studies have shown that there are areas in the root canal that cannot be reached during chemomechanical shaping. One of the most popular techniques developed to deliver irrigation solutions to these areas is the Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) technique, which provides good efficiency in terms of cleaning the root canal system. Activation of NAOCI with ultrasonic systems in the final irrigation significantly reduces the amount of microorganisms in the canal. Although the use of PUI in the final irrigation increases the effectiveness of irrigation solutions and enables the solutions to reach the apical third of the root canal, it causes extrusion of solutions into periapical tissues, albeit in small amounts, due to the positive apical pressure it creates during irrigation, and this causes postoperative pain. Postoperative pain is an undesirable but frequently encountered condition after endodontic treatment. During root canal treatment, extrusion of irrigation solutions or debris from the apex, mechanical, chemical or microbial factors can cause postoperative pain. In one study, the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment was reported to vary from 3% to 58%. Although the most effective is not yet fully known, when the literature is reviewed, different durations and cycles have been used for PUI. The change in the number of PUI cycles increases the microflow in the root canal, which may increase irrigation extrusion from the apical region and affect postoperative pain. Although many results have been reported in studies comparing the effect of final activation with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on postoperative pain with another technique, the activation cycle with PUI was determined as 3 times and 20 seconds each time, and this cycle order remained the same most of the time. Since there is no study in which the differences between cycles in activation with PUI affected postoperative pain, in this study the irrigation solution will be activated with PUI 3 times for 20 seconds and 6 times for 10 seconds, and the postoperative pain created by these two cycle orders will be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is planned to be conducted on 60 patients between the ages of 18-45 who were diagnosed and followed up at the Endodontics Clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry of Van Yuzuncu Yil University. Patients with no systemic disease, diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, single-rooted and single-canal lower premolar teeth will be included in the case group. Patients with resorption and calcification at the roots of their teeth, incomplete root development, pregnant and breastfeeding, those who have taken analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 12 hours, those who have used antibiotics in the last month, and those who cannot use a rubber dam in root canal treatment will not be included in the study. After obtaining the consent form from the patients, local anesthesia (Ultracain DS Fort, Hoechst-Marian Roussel, Frankfurt, Germany) will be applied to the tooth to be treated with root canal treatment. The access cavity will be opened with diamond burs under rubber dam isolation. The working length will be determined using a #10 K file (Mani Inc, Tochigi, Japan) and an electronic apex locator (Propex Pixi, Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland). The root canals will be shaped to a size 40/0.06 using NiTI rotary files (ProTaper Next; Dentsply Sirona) at 300 rpm and 2 Ncm according to the manufacturer's instructions. The patients will be divided into 3 groups according to the final irrigation activation protocol for root canal treatment: Group 1: Control group. In the final irrigation, NaOCI will be applied with needle irrigation for a total of 60 s. Group 2: PUI 3\*20 s. In the final irrigation, NaOCI will be applied with PUI for 3\*20 s for a total of 60 s. Group 3: PUI 6\*10 s. In the final irrigation, NaOCI will be applied for 60 seconds in total with PUI for 6\*10 seconds. 5.25% NaOCI and 17% EDTA will be used as irrigation solution during the shaping process. NaviTip irrigation needle (30-G; Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, USA) will be used in the irrigation process during shaping. After the activation process is completed, the canals will be rinsed with distilled water as the final irrigation and the root canals will be filled with gutta percha and Adseal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju, North Korea) root canal sealer using the single cone method. The teeth will be restored with composite. Patients will be prescribed 400 mg ibuprofen anti-inflammatory medication to use in case of severe pain. The pain levels of the patients before and after the procedure will be evaluated with the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain scale. Patients will be given a 10 cm paper ruler to record their pain levels at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and 1 week. Patients will be instructed on how to score their pain levels and will be asked to mark their pain levels on the ruler at the specified hours. At the end of the 1 week period, the rulers will be collected from the patients and the data will be statistically analyzed and interpreted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be divided into 3 groups according to the final irrigation activation method; Group 1: Control Group, Group 2: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation 3\*20 sec, Group 3: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation 6\*10 sec.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

In the final irrigation, 6 ml of 5.252% NaOCI will be applied with needle irrigation for a total of 60 seconds.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional needle irrigation

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional needle irrigation method was applied. As a final irrigation, 6 ml NaOCl was applied with 60 seconds of needle irrigation followed by 60 seconds of rest.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation 3*20 sec

In the final irrigation, 6 ml of 5.25% NaOCI will be applied as 3\*20 seconds with PUI for a total of 60 seconds.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with 3*20 sn

Intervention Type OTHER

In the final irrigation, 6 ml (3×2 ml) NaOCl was activated by PUI for 20 seconds in 3 cycles (60 seconds total). Before each cycle, 2 ml of NaOCl solution was refreshment.

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation 6*10 sec

In the final irrigation, 6 ml of 5.25% NaOCI will be applied as 6\*10 seconds with PUI for a total of 60 seconds.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with 6*10 sn

Intervention Type OTHER

For the final irrigation, 6 ml (6×1 ml) NaOCl was activated with PUI for 10 seconds in 6 cycles (60 seconds total). Before each cycle, 1 ml of NaOCl solution was refreshment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional needle irrigation

Conventional needle irrigation method was applied. As a final irrigation, 6 ml NaOCl was applied with 60 seconds of needle irrigation followed by 60 seconds of rest.

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with 3*20 sn

In the final irrigation, 6 ml (3×2 ml) NaOCl was activated by PUI for 20 seconds in 3 cycles (60 seconds total). Before each cycle, 2 ml of NaOCl solution was refreshment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with 6*10 sn

For the final irrigation, 6 ml (6×1 ml) NaOCl was activated with PUI for 10 seconds in 6 cycles (60 seconds total). Before each cycle, 1 ml of NaOCl solution was refreshment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy persons between the ages of 18 and 45 years
* Single-rooted and single-canal mandibular premolars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are taken analgesic inflammatory drugs with in the last 12 hours
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Teeth with calcified canals
* Teeth with sensitive to percussion and palpation
* Teeth with root resorption
* Teeth with immature/open apex
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yuzuncu Yıl University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Esin Özlek

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Esin Özlek

Associate professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hüseyin Gündüz

Role: CONTACT

+905413523162

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Arslan H. The Effect of Apical Positive and Negative Pressure Irrigation Methods on Postoperative Pain in Mandibular Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Aug;44(8):1210-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29935873 (View on PubMed)

Estevez R, Conde AJ, Valencia de Pablo O, de la Torre F, Rossi-Fedele G, Cisneros R. Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Activation on Organic Tissue Dissolution from Simulated Grooves in Root Canals Using Sodium Hypochlorite with or without Surfactants and EDTA. J Endod. 2017 Jul;43(7):1161-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.041. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28416316 (View on PubMed)

Middha M, Sangwan P, Tewari S, Duhan J. Effect of continuous ultrasonic irrigation on postoperative pain in mandibular molars with nonvital pulps: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2017 Jun;50(6):522-530. doi: 10.1111/iej.12666. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27248848 (View on PubMed)

Ali A, Hashem AAR, Roshdy NN, Abdelwahed A. The Effect of Final Irrigation Agitation Techniques on Postoperative Pain after Single Visit Root Canal Treatment of Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Endod J. 2023 May;8(3):187-193. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.39200.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37257031 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03/15.11.2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id