Comparing Suicide Prevention Interventions to Guide Follow-up Care: The SPRING Trial

NCT ID: NCT06128239

Last Updated: 2025-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

854 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-29

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. one-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. enhanced usual care for suicide prevention in adults and adolescents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicide Suicide Prevention Suicide and Self-harm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants randomized 1:1:1 to three treatment conditions
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Participants are aware of their own treatment condition but masked to the other two treatment conditions. Most investigators, including the senior statistician, are masked to treatment conditions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Two-Way Caring Contacts Texts (CC2)

In addition to receiving enhanced usual care as described below, a series of 25 standardized outgoing Caring Contacts text messages will be sent to participants randomized to the CC2 intervention arm through our online texting platform. To remind participants that they can respond, the outgoing texts will periodically invite replies in a non-demanding way, e.g., "Hope you're doing well this week, Anna. Feel free to text me back if you feel like it, I'm here for you." Responses to CC2 participant replies will be unscripted and individually tailored.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caring Contacts

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Text message version of Motto's Caring Contacts intervention. The study will compare two versions of text-based Caring Contacts: two-way messages, to which participants can respond to receive text-based support from follow-up specialists, and one-way text messages, to which participants cannot respond.

One-Way Caring Contacts Texts (CC1)

In addition to receiving enhanced usual care as described below, CC1 participants will be sent 25 caring texts, such as "Even though know we do not personally know each other, we truly value your wellbeing and are thinking of you. If you'd like to connect with someone, feel free to call or text 988 anytime - their team would be happy to hear from you." CC1 participants will not be able to reply to the texts and the online texting platform will block incoming messages. This will be clearly communicated to CC1 participants during the informed consent process and they will be asked to sign off on understanding this and other key points before enrolling in the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Caring Contacts

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Text message version of Motto's Caring Contacts intervention. The study will compare two versions of text-based Caring Contacts: two-way messages, to which participants can respond to receive text-based support from follow-up specialists, and one-way text messages, to which participants cannot respond.

Enhanced Usual Care (UC)

Participants randomized to the UC arm will receive best available usual care from the health system, such as standardized clinical assessments, the safety planning intervention or other intervention(s), appropriate referrals and/or medication management through a system wide electronic health record system-assisted suicide care clinical workflow. Usual care will vary based on patient clinical needs, availability of providers/staff, and provider clinical judgment. Following study enrollment, all participants will be given a list of resources, offered a warm hand-off to 988, and encouragement to call or text 988 as needed. During the baseline survey, participants will have the opportunity to opt into a call from the follow-up team to develop or revise a safety plan.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caring Contacts

Text message version of Motto's Caring Contacts intervention. The study will compare two versions of text-based Caring Contacts: two-way messages, to which participants can respond to receive text-based support from follow-up specialists, and one-way text messages, to which participants cannot respond.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Caring Texts Caring Letters

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adolescents (12-17 years old) and adults (18+)
* Response of "yes" to at least one item on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) six-item screener at a St. Luke's Health System (SLHS) primary care or behavioral health clinic, or electronic health record or provider note from an eligible encounter indicates suicide risk
* Ability to send and receive text messages
* Ability to receive phone calls
* Ability to receive emails
* Participant and legal guardian (if applicable) speak, read, and understand English
* Accommodations may be made for individuals with impaired hearing

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who participated in a previous randomized controlled trial in the same health system related to Caring Contacts (SPARC Trial or MHAPPS Trial)
* Patients who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent\*, for example, due to acute or chronic cognitive impairment (i.e.: acute psychosis, intoxication, or intellectual disability).
* Primary Care Provider, Behavioral Health Provider, or Principal Investigator determines that participation in the research is not in the best interest of the patient or the study team.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Idaho Crisis & Suicide Hotline

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anna Radin

Applied Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna K Radin, DrPH, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Luke's Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Luke's Health System

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Radin AK, Brown SP, Shaw J, Fouts T, McCue E, Skeie A, Pierce H, Flint H, Biss M, Sandoval D, Chase K, Davis J, Austin G, Chan KCG, Fruhbauerova M, Ratzliff A, Walton M, Bronner J, McCutchan PK, Comtois KA. Comparative effectiveness of two-way caring contacts texts vs one-way caring contacts texts vs enhanced usual care to reduce suicidal behavior in adolescents and adults: Protocol for the SPRING pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;151:107839. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107839. Epub 2025 Feb 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39938610 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TBT-0-022-22

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2023-0088

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Military Continuity Project
NCT01829620 COMPLETED NA