Therapeutic Evaluative Conditioning to Reduce Adolescents' Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors During and After Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitalization

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Suicide is the 2nd leading cause of death among adolescents, with the highest risk period for suicide being the month following psychiatric inpatient hospitalization. The investigators propose testing a brief, scalable intervention using evaluative conditioning aimed at reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adolescents during and after inpatient hospitalization. Scalable interventions, such as the one proposed that reduce suicide risk during this markedly high-risk period, could result in large-scale decreases in suicide death.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Advancing Suicide Intervention Strategies for Teens During High Risk Periods

NCT05078970

Suicide Attempts Suicidal Ideation Suicide and Self-harm +1 more

RECRUITING NA

Psychoeducational Course for Suicide Prevention

NCT06466356

Suicide Prevention Suicide Threat Self Efficacy +3 more

RECRUITING NA

Implementing a Brief Suicide Intervention for High Risk Youth With Front-Line Juvenile Justice Staff

NCT02981420

Suicide and Self Harm

UNKNOWN NA

Observational Study to Compare Outcomes of Different Psychiatric Treatment of Suicidal Adolescents

NCT04625686

Suicidal Ideation

COMPLETED

Reducing Suicide Risk in Adolescents and Young Adults Via a Psychobehavioral Intervention to Regularize Daily Rhythms

NCT05317481

Bipolar Disorder Major Depressive Disorder Mood Disorders +2 more

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The project has two phases: a pilot phase and randomized controlled trial phase. The study within each phase consists of three parts: an inpatient study period, where baseline data are collected, the intervention is initiated, and treatment targets and outcomes are assessed; a one-month post-discharge period, where the intervention is continued and treatment targets and outcomes are assessed and a one-month post-intervention period, where the intervention is no longer administered but treatment targets and outcomes are assessed to test whether the intervention has sustained treatment effects. For the inpatient period, the intervention and the assessment of the treatment targets and outcomes will each be delivered via an iPad administered by a research assistant (RA). During the post-discharge and post-intervention periods assessments will be administered via smartphone mobile apps.

A. Inpatient period. There are eight components to the inpatient part of the study: (1) Parent informed consent and permission. As close as possible to the patient's intake, parents will provide consent and permission for their child to participate. For patients over the age of 17, the patient will be able to provide consent for themselves. For all participants, the investigators will obtain parent consent to collect the qualitative data from the parent on their child's experience of the intervention. (2) Patient assent and baseline data collection. As part of standard clinical intake on the McLean-Franciscan inpatient unit, participants will complete a self-report version of the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI), which will be integrated into the study data set. As soon as possible following parental consent, study staff will meet with participant to obtain assent and collect baseline data. Patient baseline data collection will consist of administration of study measures, including explicit and implicit measures of aversion toward SITB-related and self-related stimuli (i.e., baseline assessments of the treatment target), SITB since admission will be assessed (assuming it is more than 1 day after completing the full SITBI) using a "since last assessment" version of the SITBI, and a brief interview to gather information that can will be used to personalize the TEC intervention, such as details regarding methods the patient has thought of or used to self-injure. Researchers will also schedule a time for patients to complete TEC each day of their inpatient stay. (3) Personalize TEC. Following, the interview, for participants' in the active TEC arm, researchers will setup TEC to be personalized for each participant. For example, the investigators will enter the participants' name in the positive-self TEC intervention based on studies showing that evaluative conditioning paradigms where first names are paired with positive stimuli have been shown to improve implicit affect to self-related stimuli. (4) Installation of apps on patient's phone for the post-discharge part of the study. Parents bring the patient's smartphone to the hospital. The investigators have developed procedures to facilitate receiving and returning patients' phones, such as texting parents reminders and having lockboxes available for phone drop-off and pickup. An app will be installed on participants' phone. (5) TEC intervention and pre/post ratings relevant to acceptability. Because electronic devices, such as phones or tablets, are not allowed on the inpatient unit, each day a RA will bring an iPad to the patient to complete (a) the TEC intervention and (b) pre-/post-intervention measurements of mood, desire to die and urge to kill oneself to help evaluate the acceptability of TEC. (6) Assessment of treatment target and burdensomeness of the intervention. Every three days on the inpatient unit, participants will also complete measures of explicit and implicit aversion to SITB- and self-related stimuli, which are the treatment targets and ratings of the burdensomeness of TEC to evaluate the feasibility of TEC. (7) Assessment of the outcome. Daily, prior to completing the TEC intervention, participants will complete a questionnaire regarding the occurrence of any SITB in the prior 24 hours. SITBs are assessed frequently for the purposes of accurate measurement, such that participants do not have to be remember SITB events over a few days. Daily sessions will take less than 10 minutes. (8) Qualitative interview of intervention experiences. Every three days, a brief interview will assess participants' experiences and reactions to the intervention and qualitatively assess their mood and suicidal thoughts.

B. Post-discharge intervention period. For 28 days after discharge, participants will receive daily push notifications to complete a brief survey regarding SITB in the past 24 hours, the TEC intervention, and pre-/post-intervention mood, desire to die and urge to kill oneself. The push notification will be sent in the morning; additional reminders will be sent throughout the day until the tasks are completed with a maximum of 5 reminders. Once every two weeks, participants will also be asked to complete (1) implicit cognition measures to assess the treatment target and (2) a brief measure regarding the burdensomeness of TEC. A RA will contact the participant after two consecutive days of non-compliance.

C. Post-intervention follow-up. Two- and four-weeks after TEC has ended, the investigators will assess implicit cognitions (i.e., the treatment target) and SITB to test whether treatment effects persist without the intervention. The investigators will send reminders and contact participants if they do not complete the assessments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Self-Injurious Behavior Suicidal Ideation Suicide Attempts

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention and control arms

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Participants will not know which group they are in but researchers will know.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active intervention arm

Participants will complete the intervention on a mobile device.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Therapeutic Evaluative Conditioning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants are told which pictures are "matched pairs." They find the "matched pairs" among 4 or 8 pictures. By associating pictures and words associated with SITB (e.g., pictures of cut skin, pictures of people engaging in potentially suicidal behaviors, and the word "death") with naturally aversive images (e.g., snakes and spiders), it increases the aversion to SITB. The second goal is to increase liking toward the self by pairing self-relevant stimuli (e.g., the participant's name or other self-relevant details, as well as words like "I" and "me").

Control arm

Participants will complete the sham comparator on a mobile device.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Neutral comparison condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Match neutral pictures to account for doing an intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Therapeutic Evaluative Conditioning

Participants are told which pictures are "matched pairs." They find the "matched pairs" among 4 or 8 pictures. By associating pictures and words associated with SITB (e.g., pictures of cut skin, pictures of people engaging in potentially suicidal behaviors, and the word "death") with naturally aversive images (e.g., snakes and spiders), it increases the aversion to SITB. The second goal is to increase liking toward the self by pairing self-relevant stimuli (e.g., the participant's name or other self-relevant details, as well as words like "I" and "me").

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neutral comparison condition

Match neutral pictures to account for doing an intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be a patient on McLean-Franciscan Child and Adolescent Inpatient Program (MF-CAIP) of Franciscan Children's (FC)
* Be 12-19 years-old
* Own a smartphone
* Have a parent/guardian that can provide permission
* Child can assent
* Presentation to the hospital with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any factor that impairs an individual's ability to comprehend and effectively participate in the study, including
* an inability to speak or write English fluently
* the presence of gross cognitive impairment due to florid psychosis, intellectual disability, dementia, acute intoxication, etc., or the presence of extremely agitated or violent behavior
* a potential discharge location anticipated to be a residential program in which the average length of stay is more than 14 days

Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No