Brief Interventions for Short-Term Suicide Risk Reduction in Military Populations

NCT ID: NCT02042131

Last Updated: 2017-08-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the proposed study is to identify the most effective brief interventions for reducing short-term risk for suicide attempts in "real world" military triage settings, and to identify potential mechanisms of change underlying the interventions' impact on subsequent suicide attempts. We will randomize 360 patients to one of three commonly-used crisis interventions delivered as routine care in the mental health triage system: (1) Treatment As Usual (TAU); (2) Standard Crisis Response Plan (S-CRP); or (3) Enhanced Crisis Response Plan with Reasons For Living (E-CRP). The following hypotheses will be tested:

1. The enhanced crisis response plan (E-CRP) intervention will contribute to significantly decreased risk for suicide attempts and hospitalization during follow-up relative to the standard crisis response plan alone (S-CRP) and treatment as usual (TAU).
2. The standard crisis response plan (S-CRP) intervention will contribute to significantly decreased risk for suicide attempts and hospitalization during follow-up relative to treatment as usual (TAU).
3. Greater ambivalence about suicide and faster recall of reasons for living will mediate the relationship between intervention and reduced risk for suicide attempt during follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The CRP has been proposed as an alternative to TAU for the short-term management of suicidal patients and is now in widespread use, but has never been empirically tested. The CRP is purported to reduce suicide risk via unique mechanisms that directly suicide risk, notably suicidal ambivalence (i.e., the relative balance between the wish to live and the wish to die) and problem solving. Because suicidal ambivalence has gained support as an active mechanism for reducing suicide risk, the present study will also seek to augment this underlying mechanism by directly engaging the suicidal patient in a discussion about their reasons for living, thereby potentially increasing the potency of the CRP.

The present study therefore entails a component analysis of crisis interventions. As such, we anticipate ordered effects, whereby the S-CRP and E-CRP conditions will show significantly better outcomes than TAU, and E-CRP will demonstrate significantly better outcomes than the standard CRP condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Suicide Suicidal Ideation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment As Usual (TAU)

TAU includes the following intervention components:

1. suicide risk assessment
2. supportive listening
3. provision of professional and crisis contact information
4. referral to mental health treatment and community resources
5. verbal contract for safety

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment As Usual (TAU)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Crisis Response Plan (S-CRP)

CRP includes the following intervention components:

1. suicide risk assessment
2. supportive listening
3. identify personal warning signs
4. identify self-management skills
5. identify social support contacts
6. provision of professional and crisis contact information
7. referral to mental health treatment and community resources

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard Crisis Response Plan (S-CRP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Crisis Response Plan (E-CRP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Crisis Response Plan (E-CRP)

The E-CRP includes the following intervention components:

1. suicide risk assessment
2. supportive listening
3. identify personal warning signs
4. identify self-management skills
5. identify reasons for living
6. identify social support contacts
7. provision of professional and crisis contact information
8. referral to mental health treatment and community resources

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enhanced Crisis Response Plan (E-CRP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment As Usual (TAU)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Crisis Response Plan (S-CRP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced Crisis Response Plan (E-CRP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Usual Care Enhanced Care Enhanced Care As Usual Safety Plan Safety Plan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Active duty
* 18 years of age or older
* Reporting current suicidal ideation with intent to die, or a suicide attempt within the past two weeks
* Able to speak and understand the English language
* Able to complete the informed consent process

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe psychiatric or medical conditions that preclude the ability to provide informed consent or participation in outpatient treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Craig Bryan

PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Craig J Bryan, PsyD, ABPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Center for Veterans Studies & The University of Utah

Tracy A Clemans, PsyD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

National Center for Veterans Studies & The University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fort Carson

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, Burch TS, Leeson B, Williams S, Rudd MD. Effect of Crisis Response Planning on Patient Mood and Clinician Decision Making: A Clinical Trial With Suicidal U.S. Soldiers. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jan 1;69(1):108-111. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700157. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28967323 (View on PubMed)

Lowder EM, Rade CB, Desmarais SL. Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis. Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jan 1;69(1):15-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700107. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28806894 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://veterans.utah.edu

National Center for Veterans Studies

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH-10-2-0181

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01481

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Military Continuity Project
NCT01829620 COMPLETED NA
Couple-Based Crisis Safety Planning
NCT07012824 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Refinement of Suicide Risk Management Intervention
NCT04888845 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA