Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Randomized Controlled Trial)
NCT ID: NCT05669976
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-10
2026-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Open Trial)
NCT05087966
Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Case Series)
NCT04757649
Development and Feasibility Testing of a Suicide Prevention Intervention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth
NCT05724784
Effectiveness of a Family-Based Intervention for Adolescent Suicide Attempters (The SAFETY Study)
NCT00692302
Effectiveness Trial of Youth Suicide Prevention Delivered by Teen Peer Leaders
NCT02043093
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One group that is particularly vulnerable to suicide is sexual and gender minorities (SGMs). SGM is an umbrella term used to describe individuals who identify as non-exclusively heterosexual (e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual) and/or as transgender/non-binary (e.g., identify as a gender different from their birth sex). Extant research consistently notes substantial mental health disparities among SGMs in comparison to their heterosexual and cis-gender counterparts. In 2017, in the U.S., 23% of sexual minority youth reported one or more suicide attempts (in the past 12 months) vs. 5.4% of heterosexual youth. This disparity has also been noted in a meta-analysis of population-based longitudinal studies, with sexual minority adolescents and emerging adults reporting 2.26 increased odds of suicide attempts compared to their heterosexual counterparts. Prevalence of lifetime suicide attempts among gender minorities is also substantially elevated compared to the general population, with 45% of 18-24-year-old transgender individuals reporting history of one or more suicide attempts.
Despite these substantial health disparities in suicide among SGM youth/emerging adults, no known suicide prevention programs exist for this highly vulnerable population. Given this crucial gap in the literature, the proposed study will adapt and test a patient navigation (PN) intervention for SGM youth/emerging adults designed to target mechanisms (i.e., decreasing thwarted belongingness and increasing suicide-related coping skills) that theoretically underlie suicide. The intervention integrates a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention (Safety Planning Intervention; SPI) with PN services (PN+SPI). The patient navigator will deliver the SPI and continue frequent contact for the purpose of providing motivational enhancement, problem-solving, reinforcing coping strategies, and connecting participants to social support and mental health resources (e.g., SGM-specific support groups within the community). After completing the development of the PN+SPI intervention during a previous phase of the project, this study will accomplish the following specific aims:
Specific Aim 2: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the integrated PN+SPI by comparing it to the safety planning intervention alone to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. We plan to randomize 170 SGM youth/emerging adults to either the PN+SPI or SPI alone and follow participants for 12 months. It is expected that the pilot trial will provide additional information about the feasibility and acceptability of the PN+SPI intervention and study methods, in preparation for a future full-scale efficacy trial. In addition, the pilot test will evaluate its preliminary impact on suicide attempts. It is hypothesized that participants assigned to the PN+SPI intervention will demonstrate lower suicide attempts in comparison to participants assigned to the SPI alone condition.
Specific Aim 3: To conduct longitudinal analysis of the mechanisms of action of the integrated PN+SPI. To understand the mechanisms of change in the PN+SPI intervention, we will assess the theoretical purported targets (i.e., decreases in thwarted belongingness and increases in suicide-related coping skills). We hypothesize that participants assigned to the PN+SPI intervention will demonstrate clinically meaningful changes in the target variables relative to participants assigned to the SPI alone condition. Subsequently, these changes in proposed targets will predict changes in suicidal attempts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Safety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services
A patient navigation (PN) intervention for SGM youth/emerging adults designed to target mechanisms (i.e., decreasing thwarted belongingness and increasing suicide-related coping skills) that theoretically underlie suicide. The proposed intervention integrates a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention (Safety Planning Intervention; SPI) with PN services (PN+SPI). The patient navigator will deliver the SPI and continue frequent contact for the purpose of providing motivational enhancement, problem-solving, reinforcing coping strategies, and connecting participants to mental health and social support resources (e.g., SGM-specific support groups within the community).
Safety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services
A patient navigation (PN) intervention for SGM youth/emerging adults designed to target mechanisms (i.e., decreasing thwarted belongingness and increasing suicide-related coping skills) that theoretically underlie suicide. The proposed intervention integrates a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention (Safety Planning Intervention; SPI) with PN services (PN+SPI). The patient navigator will deliver the SPI and continue frequent contact for the purpose of providing motivational enhancement, problem-solving, reinforcing coping strategies, and connecting participants to mental health and social support resources (e.g., SGM-specific support groups within the community).
Safety Planning Intervention
The Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention. The patient navigator will deliver the SPI.
Safety Planning Intervention
The Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention. The patient navigator will deliver the SPI.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Safety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services
A patient navigation (PN) intervention for SGM youth/emerging adults designed to target mechanisms (i.e., decreasing thwarted belongingness and increasing suicide-related coping skills) that theoretically underlie suicide. The proposed intervention integrates a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention (Safety Planning Intervention; SPI) with PN services (PN+SPI). The patient navigator will deliver the SPI and continue frequent contact for the purpose of providing motivational enhancement, problem-solving, reinforcing coping strategies, and connecting participants to mental health and social support resources (e.g., SGM-specific support groups within the community).
Safety Planning Intervention
The Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a single-session, empirically supported, suicide prevention intervention. The patient navigator will deliver the SPI.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
15 Years
29 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
San Diego State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aaron Blashill
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aaron J Blashill, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
San Diego State University
Kristen J Wells, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
San Diego State University
Arjan van der Star, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
San Diego State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Diego State University
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Olfson M, Blanco C, Wall M, Liu SM, Saha TD, Pickering RP, Grant BF. National Trends in Suicide Attempts Among Adults in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1095-1103. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2582.
Ivey-Stephenson AZ, Crosby AE, Jack SPD, Haileyesus T, Kresnow-Sedacca MJ. Suicide Trends Among and Within Urbanization Levels by Sex, Race/Ethnicity, Age Group, and Mechanism of Death - United States, 2001-2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Oct 6;66(18):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6618a1.
Shepard DS, Gurewich D, Lwin AK, Reed GA Jr, Silverman MM. Suicide and Suicidal Attempts in the United States: Costs and Policy Implications. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2016 Jun;46(3):352-62. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12225. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64806/
Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Queen B, Lowry R, Chyen D, Whittle L, Thornton J, Lim C, Bradford D, Yamakawa Y, Leon M, Brener N, Ethier KA. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Jun 15;67(8):1-114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.
Miranda-Mendizabal A, Castellvi P, Pares-Badell O, Almenara J, Alonso I, Blasco MJ, Cebria A, Gabilondo A, Gili M, Lagares C, Piqueras JA, Roca M, Rodriguez-Marin J, Rodriguez-Jimenez T, Soto-Sanz V, Vilagut G, Alonso J. Sexual orientation and suicidal behaviour in adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;211(2):77-87. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.196345. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
Stanley B, Brown GK, Brenner LA, Galfalvy HC, Currier GW, Knox KL, Chaudhury SR, Bush AL, Green KL. Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):894-900. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776.
Labouliere CD, Stanley B, Lake AM, Gould MS. Safety Planning on Crisis Lines: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Perceived Helpfulness of a Brief Intervention to Mitigate Future Suicide Risk. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12554. Epub 2019 May 21.
Cramer RJ, Kapusta ND. A Social-Ecological Framework of Theory, Assessment, and Prevention of Suicide. Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01756. eCollection 2017.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
10 Leading Causes of Death, United States: 2016, All Races, Both Sexes
Safety Planning Intervention: A Brief Intervention to Mitigate Suicide Risk
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS-2022-0204
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.