Post-operative Electrical Muscle Stimulation to Stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis in Humans

NCT ID: NCT05997095

Last Updated: 2025-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-22

Study Completion Date

2025-12-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Skeletal muscle accounts for approximately 45-55% of total body mass in healthy adults and plays a pivotal role in whole-body metabolic health, locomotion and physical independence. Undesirable loss of skeletal muscle mass (atrophy) is, however, a common feature of many communicable and non-communicable diseases including ageing, bed-rest/immobilisation, cancer and physical inactivity. As such, the design of optimal strategies (e.g., different types of exercise) to "offset" these detrimental losses of muscle is a focus for both researchers and clinicians.

One situation where losses of muscle mass occur very quickly (i.e., within a few days) is after surgery. However, at this time, most people (especially if they have had major abdominal or lower-limb surgery) are not able to perform exercise and as such a different strategy to maintain muscle mass needs to be found. It has been shown that electrical stimulation of the leg muscles can maintain muscle mass and function in patients after surgery. It is not however yet known, what the optimal electrical stimulation regime is to preserve muscle mass during situations of disuse.

This study aims to examine the impact of three different electrical stimulation protocols on muscle building processes in individuals age-matched to those most commonly presenting for major abdominal surgery. This information will then be used in a clinical trial of surgical patients to see if it can preserve their muscle mass and function in the post-operative period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The contraction of skeletal muscles depends on the regulation of the nervous system and the coordination of neuromuscular function. The smallest motor nervous system associated with muscle contraction is the motor unit (MU), which consists of an efferent motor neuron and all of the muscle fibres it innervates. Muscle tissue also undergoes adaptive alternations in response to external stimuli, such as the gradual decline in muscle mass and strength during ageing, and atrophy following muscle disuse. A number of studies have demonstrated that different types of voluntary movements, such as resistance exercise training (RET), can prevent or attenuate such alternations to a certain extent via increases in muscle protein synthesis (MPS).

However, certain situations such as post-operative bed rest render RET interventions an unachievable option. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be applied as a surrogate; acting to evoke involuntary contraction of the target muscles via electrical current applied to the muscle belly. Although NMES stimulation has been widely tested in the intensive care environment, results have shown variable efficacy- perhaps due to the multi-organ failure and associated catabolic systemic environment encountered by the majority of these patients.

It has recently shown that in post-operative abdominal surgery patients, 5-days of NMES, performed at frequency of 30 Hz in a 1 second "on", 1 second "off" contraction pattern, can mitigate losses in muscle mass and function. However, this study 'borrowed' a protocol from previous intensive care literature, and as such may not be optimal with regards to frequency or contraction pattern. Given that this protocol was highly tolerated by patients in a previous study (i.e., based on 30 min of daily NMES, patients in this study said they would tolerate it for 45 to 240 (mean 90) min), it is plausible that higher frequency NMES (\~100 Hz), enabling greater force production may be both viable and result in further mitigation of muscle mass and function losses. It has also been demonstrated that the time muscle is under loaded tension during RET may be an important modulator of MPS and subsequent gains in muscle mass. Therefore, increasing the contraction relative to relaxation time during NMES (e.g., 3 seconds on, 1 second off) may be another feasible and perhaps more beneficial strategy to reduce muscle mass losses in populations where an increase in frequency may not be possible or tolerable.

Knowing that muscle maintenance is based on a dynamic equilibrium between MPS and muscle protein breakdown, the impact of different NMES protocols on MPS, associated cell signalling, and nutrient delivery pathways needs to be explored so that an optimal intervention can be tested in clinical settings associated with disuse atrophy. To date, no previous studies have compared differing frequencies of NMES on the muscle metabolic responses in older adults, nor the effect of differing NMES-induced contraction patterns.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skeletal Muscle Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

30Hz (low-intensity)

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0

Intervention Type OTHER

NMES will be applied for 30 min and will be delivered using an approved, CE-marked device (Premier Combo Plus, Med-Fit Ltd, UK) using two large (7.5 × 13 cm) electrodes placed proximally and distally over the lateral quadriceps. The set protocols will be pre-programmed into to the device and the amplitude value will match the setting that was determined during a familiarisation visit

100Hz (higher-intensity)

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 100Hz with a contraction pattern of 1 second "on" and 1 second "off"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0

Intervention Type OTHER

NMES will be applied for 30 min and will be delivered using an approved, CE-marked device (Premier Combo Plus, Med-Fit Ltd, UK) using two large (7.5 × 13 cm) electrodes placed proximally and distally over the lateral quadriceps. The set protocols will be pre-programmed into to the device and the amplitude value will match the setting that was determined during a familiarisation visit

30Hz (low-intensity, 3:1)

Volunteers receive 30 mins of neuromuscular electrical stimulation at 30Hz with a contraction pattern of 3 seconds "on" and 1 second "off"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0

Intervention Type OTHER

NMES will be applied for 30 min and will be delivered using an approved, CE-marked device (Premier Combo Plus, Med-Fit Ltd, UK) using two large (7.5 × 13 cm) electrodes placed proximally and distally over the lateral quadriceps. The set protocols will be pre-programmed into to the device and the amplitude value will match the setting that was determined during a familiarisation visit

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES/0

NMES will be applied for 30 min and will be delivered using an approved, CE-marked device (Premier Combo Plus, Med-Fit Ltd, UK) using two large (7.5 × 13 cm) electrodes placed proximally and distally over the lateral quadriceps. The set protocols will be pre-programmed into to the device and the amplitude value will match the setting that was determined during a familiarisation visit

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 60-85 y
* Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* BMI \<18.5 or \>35kg/m2
* Participation in any regular, structured RET within the past 6 months
* Musculoskeletal disorders
* Severe respiratory disease:
* COPD
* Pulmonary hypertension
* Neurological disorders:
* Cerebrovascular disease (cerebral haemorrhage; cerebral ischemic stroke)
* Intracranial space-occupying lesion
* Epilepsy
* Metabolic disease:
* Hyper and hypo parathyroidism
* Untreated hyper and hypothyroidism
* Cushing's disease
* Type 1 or 2 diabetes
* Active cardiovascular problems:
* Uncontrolled hypertension (BP\>160/100mmHg)
* Recent cardiac event
* Heart failure (Class III/IV)
* Arrhythmia
* Angina
* Blood clotting disorders
* Active inflammatory bowel or renal disease
* Recent malignancy (in previous 3 years)
* Recent steroid treatment within 6 months or hormone replacement therapy
* Family history of early (\<55yrs) death from cardiovascular disease
* Known sensitivity to Sonovue
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nottingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bethan Phillips

Professor of Translational Physiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nottingham

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hardy EJ, Hatt J, Doleman B, Smart TF, Piasecki M, Lund JN, Phillips BE. Post-operative electrical muscle stimulation attenuates loss of muscle mass and function following major abdominal surgery in older adults: a split body randomised control trial. Age Ageing. 2022 Oct 6;51(10):afac234. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac234.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36315433 (View on PubMed)

Hardy EJO, Inns TB, Hatt J, Doleman B, Bass JJ, Atherton PJ, Lund JN, Phillips BE. The time course of disuse muscle atrophy of the lower limb in health and disease. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Dec;13(6):2616-2629. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13067. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36104842 (View on PubMed)

Wall BT, Dirks ML, Verdijk LB, Snijders T, Hansen D, Vranckx P, Burd NA, Dendale P, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation increases muscle protein synthesis in elderly type 2 diabetic men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Sep 1;303(5):E614-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00138.2012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22739107 (View on PubMed)

Mancinelli R, Toniolo L, Di Filippo ES, Doria C, Marrone M, Maroni CR, Verratti V, Bondi D, Maccatrozzo L, Pietrangelo T, Fulle S. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Induces Skeletal Muscle Fiber Remodeling and Specific Gene Expression Profile in Healthy Elderly. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 27;10:1459. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01459. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31827446 (View on PubMed)

Burd NA, Andrews RJ, West DW, Little JP, Cochran AJ, Hector AJ, Cashaback JG, Gibala MJ, Potvin JR, Baker SK, Phillips SM. Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub-fractional synthetic responses in men. J Physiol. 2012 Jan 15;590(2):351-62. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221200. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22106173 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMHS 261-0423

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sarcopenia and Intervention Physical Therapy
NCT07013604 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Muscle Damage and Disuse Atrophy
NCT03559452 COMPLETED NA