Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Preserves Muscle Mass in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT ID: NCT05287919
Last Updated: 2022-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-01
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: to compare the effects of low-frequency and medium-frequency NMES, along with a standard physical therapy (SPT) programme, on the attenuation of skeletal muscle atrophy in critically ill patients.
Methods: Fifty-four critically ill patients admitted into intensive care unit (ICU) and on mechanical ventilation (MV) participated in this randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. Participants were allocated to one of the following groups: Control Group (CG), received a standard lower limb physical therapy (SPT) programme, 2x/day; Low-frequency NMES Group (LFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz, 2x/day; and Medium-frequency NMES Group (MFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz and carrier frequency of 2500 Hz, 2x/day. The primary outcome was the thickness and quality of the quadriceps muscle, evaluated with ultrasonography while patients were in ICU. Secondary outcomes, assessed at various stages of recovery, were strength, functionality, independence for activities of daily living, quality of life, and total days hospitalized.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of NMES in Critically Ill Patients
NCT04382378
Mobilization With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Critical Care Patients
NCT02298114
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Critically Ill Patients With Mechanical Ventilation
NCT05217511
Bed Rest and Muscle Strength in ICU: Interest in the Early Association of NEMS With Cyclo-ergometer Mobilization
NCT03987997
NMES Role to Prevent Respiratory Muscle Weakness in Critically Ill Patients and Its Association to Changes in Myokines.
NCT05536531
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research question: The research question was is medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) more effective than low-frequency NMES for the attenuation of skeletal muscle atrophy in critically ill patients?
Objective: To compare the effects of low-frequency and medium-frequency NMES, along with a standard physical therapy (SPT) programme, on the attenuation of skeletal muscle atrophy in critically ill patients.
Methods: Fifty-four critically ill patients admitted into intensive care unit (ICU) and on mechanical ventilation (MV) participated in this randomized, single-blinded, experimental study. Participants were allocated to one of the following groups: Control Group (CG), received a standard lower limb physical therapy (SPT) programme, 2x/day; Low-frequency NMES Group (LFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz, 2x/day; and Medium-frequency NMES Group (MFG), received lower limb SPT+NMES at 100 Hz and carrier frequency of 2500 Hz, 2x/day. The primary outcome was the thickness and quality of the quadriceps muscle, evaluated with ultrasonography while patients were in ICU. Secondary outcomes, assessed at various stages of recovery, were muscle strength (MRC-SS), handgrip strength (dynamometry), functional status (FSS-ICU), degree of independence for activities of daily living (Barthel Index), functional mobility and dynamic balance (Timed Up and Go Test), quality of life (SF-36), and total days hospitalized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme only (passive mobilization) twice a day.
Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.
All participants have received standard physical therapy (SPT) sessions based on a passive range of motion mobilization protocol for the lower limbs. It consisted of a bilateral series of 10 repetitions of hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, and ankle flexion and extension. The procedure was performed twice a day: a morning (between 8am - 12pm) and an afternoon session (between 2pm - 6pm).
Low-frequency NMES group
Patients submitted to low-frequency NMES and SPT twice a day.
Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.
All participants have received standard physical therapy (SPT) sessions based on a passive range of motion mobilization protocol for the lower limbs. It consisted of a bilateral series of 10 repetitions of hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, and ankle flexion and extension. The procedure was performed twice a day: a morning (between 8am - 12pm) and an afternoon session (between 2pm - 6pm).
Patients received the low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands). The low-frequency protocol consisted of 100 Hz and 400 ms width pulses, delivered in trains of 5 s ON (ramp-up time: 1 s, plateau: 3 s, ramp-down time: 1 s) and 10 s OFF. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.
Medium-frequency NMES group
Patients submitted to medium-frequency NMES and SPT twice a day.
Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.
All participants have received standard physical therapy (SPT) sessions based on a passive range of motion mobilization protocol for the lower limbs. It consisted of a bilateral series of 10 repetitions of hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, and ankle flexion and extension. The procedure was performed twice a day: a morning (between 8am - 12pm) and an afternoon session (between 2pm - 6pm).
Patients received the medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands).The medium-frequency protocol had similar parameters, but a carrier frequency of 2500 Hz and burst frequency of 100 Hz. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patients received the standard physical therapy (SPT) programme (passive mobilization) twice a day.
All participants have received standard physical therapy (SPT) sessions based on a passive range of motion mobilization protocol for the lower limbs. It consisted of a bilateral series of 10 repetitions of hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, and ankle flexion and extension. The procedure was performed twice a day: a morning (between 8am - 12pm) and an afternoon session (between 2pm - 6pm).
Patients received the low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands). The low-frequency protocol consisted of 100 Hz and 400 ms width pulses, delivered in trains of 5 s ON (ramp-up time: 1 s, plateau: 3 s, ramp-down time: 1 s) and 10 s OFF. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.
Patients received the medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulation was performed twice a day after SPT. Two electrodes were attached to each thigh at the motor points of the quadriceps muscle. The point halfway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of the patella was used as reference and electrodes were placed 15 cm apart each other, 5 cm proximal and 10 cm distal from the reference point. After the first measurement, semi-permanent markers were used to indicate the position of electrodes. Electrical stimulation was performed using a 4-channels device (Sonopuls 492, series 4, Enraf-Nonius®, Rotterdam, Netherlands).The medium-frequency protocol had similar parameters, but a carrier frequency of 2500 Hz and burst frequency of 100 Hz. Sessions had 20 min of duration (total of 40 min/day) and the current amplitude (mA) was adjusted to the identification of visible and palpable contractions and was rectified every 3 min to sustain the initial level of contraction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* spinal cord injury;
* cerebrovascular accident;
* patients with pacemakers;
* history of deep vein thrombosis;
* pregnancy;
* cardiac complications (history of myocardial infarction or congenital diseases);
* use of neuromuscular blockers;
* polytraumatized patients requiring tutor support.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gabriel N Marzuca-Nassr,, PT, MSc, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad de La Frontera
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera
Temuco, , Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Guerra-Vega P, Guzman R, Betancourt C, Grage M, Vera C, Artigas-Arias M, Munoz-Cofre R, Vitzel KF, Marzuca-Nassr GN. Medium-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients Promoted Larger Functional Capacity Improvement During Recovery than Low-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation: Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5407. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155407.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Tesis UFRO #1676
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.