NMES Role to Prevent Respiratory Muscle Weakness in Critically Ill Patients and Its Association to Changes in Myokines.
NCT ID: NCT05536531
Last Updated: 2025-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-11
2025-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Critically Ill Patients With Mechanical Ventilation
NCT05217511
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
NCT04076475
Effects of NMES in Critically Ill Patients
NCT04382378
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) Preserves Muscle Mass in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT05287919
Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
NCT02227810
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) represents an alternative to achieve early muscle contraction in non-cooperative patients, being able to prevent local muscle wasting and, according to some reports, has the potential to shorten the time on MV, suggesting a systemic effect through myokines, a diverse range of cytokines and chemokines secreted by myocytes during muscle contraction. These factors modulate the function and metabolism of distant organs and can promote muscle cell proliferation and growth in order to maintain muscle structure and function. However, no studies have evaluated whether NMES applied to peripheral muscles can exert distant muscle effects over the diaphragm, ameliorating its weakness, and if this protective profile is associated to myokine's change in critically ill patients.
We hypothesize that in mechanical ventilated ICU patients NMES contributes to prevent respiratory muscle weakness when initiated at an early phase of their critical illness, and this effect is associated to acute changes in myokine profile, being able to facilitate discontinuation of MV and decrease ICU length of stay.
This proposal comprises a randomized controlled study of NMES applied twice a day, for 3 days, in comparison to standard care (no NMES). Thirty-two patients will be recruited in the first 48 hours after connection to MV, and randomly assigned to either control group or stimulated group (16 subjects for each group). Muscle characterization of quadriceps and diaphragm (Structural ultrasonography evaluation of muscle thickness and tracheal twitch pressure assessment, derived from magnetic stimulation of phrenic nerve, for diaphragmatic strength) will be performed at baseline (Day 1, prior to the first NMES session) and after the last NMES session (morning of day 4). Myokine measurements (IL-1, IL-6, IL-15, BDNF, Myostatin and Decorin), through blood serum obtained from peripheric blood samples, will be performed at baseline 1 hour before NMES (T-1), just before starting NMES (T0), at the end of NMES session (T0.5), and 2 and 6 hours later (T2 and T6). This myokine curves will be repeated on days 1 and 3 at the first NMES session of the day. Control group will be assessed in the same way and timing, with the exception that blood samples will be performed at T0 and T6 of days 1 and 3. Additionally, functional outcomes such as MV time and ICU length of stay will be registered for all patients at ICU discharge. Standard care won´t be altered, performing passive mobilization according to ICU procedures in both groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NMES group
NMES will be implemented simultaneously on quadriceps femoris muscles of both lower limbs using an electrical stimulator (TRAINFES 6 ADVANCED, Biomedical devices Spa, Santiago, Chile). Four rubber surface electrodes will be placed over motor points. However, since the electrodes will cover big proportion of muscle surface, anatomical distribution of the belly muscle plus visible contraction of it will be considered for correct setting. The stimulation will be delivered by biphasic current, symmetric (compensated) impulses of 45-50 Hz frequency, 400 μsec pulse duration. With a stimulus duration of 25 minutes, and an on-off programming of 5 seconds on (including 0.8 second rise time, 3.4 seconds of plateau and 0.8 second of fall time) and 5 seconds off, at current intensities able to cause maximal visible contractions. The session duration will be 30 minutes and will be applied twice a day.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulator (Electrostimulator TRAINFES 6 ADVANCED, Biomedical devices Spa, Santiago, Chile.) to administer NMES
Control
Sham NMES will not be provided. Standard care won´t be altered and passive mobilization will be performed according to routine ICU procedures.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
Electrical stimulator (Electrostimulator TRAINFES 6 ADVANCED, Biomedical devices Spa, Santiago, Chile.) to administer NMES
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Connected to invasive MV within the previous 24-48 hours
3. Deep sedation \[non-cooperative state; Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) 1 or 2\].
4. ICU-acquired weakness risk (One of the following risk factors: the need for invasive MV, sepsis, hyperglycemia, APACHE II admission score \>13 pts, use of corticosteroids, and/or muscle inactivity due to deep sedation).
5. Written informed consent provided by patient/surrogate
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy
3. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>35 kg/m2)
4. Pre-existing Neuromuscular diseases (e.g., myasthenia Gravis, Guillain-Barré disease)
5. Diseases with systemic vascular involvement such as systemic lupus erythematosus.
6. Use of neuromuscular blockers
7. Technical obstacles to the implementation of NMES such as bone fractures or skin lesions (e.g., burns)
8. End-stage malignancy
9. Presence of cardiac pacemakers
10. Diagnosis of brain death.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yorschua Jalil, PT, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dres M, Dube BP, Mayaux J, Delemazure J, Reuter D, Brochard L, Similowski T, Demoule A. Coexistence and Impact of Limb Muscle and Diaphragm Weakness at Time of Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):57-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0367OC.
Goligher EC, Fan E, Herridge MS, Murray A, Vorona S, Brace D, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Tomlinson G, Singh JM, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND. Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation. Impact of Inspiratory Effort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1080-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0620OC.
Dirks ML, Hansen D, Van Assche A, Dendale P, Van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Mar;128(6):357-65. doi: 10.1042/CS20140447.
Truong AD, Kho ME, Brower RG, Feldman DR, Colantuoni E, Needham DM. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on cytokines in peripheral blood for healthy participants: a prospective, single-blinded Study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 May;37(3):255-262. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12290. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
Routsi C, Gerovasili V, Vasileiadis I, Karatzanos E, Pitsolis T, Tripodaki E, Markaki V, Zervakis D, Nanas S. Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R74. doi: 10.1186/cc8987. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ID 210602003
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
52-c50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.