Performance Improvement: Does Mock Code Simulation Improve the Confidence Level of Newly Graduated Nurses?
NCT ID: NCT05945316
Last Updated: 2025-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-16
2025-07-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Charge Nurse Conflict Resolution Communication Using Artificial Intelligence
NCT05594394
Intervention of Growth Mindset for Intern Nursing Students
NCT06508528
Digital Learning on Competence in Motivational Interviewing
NCT06003803
Talent Management Intervention Program for First-Line Nurse Managers
NCT06354062
The Feasibility of Motivational Interviewing on Emotional Authenticity, Dispositional Optimism, And Academic Motivation Among Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06360172
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Accessing Confidence levels of Nursing students
Three mock CODE BLUE training events for Spring, Summer, and Fall Nursing Residents and Nursing Fellows are scheduled for 2022 followed by an actively participated CODE BLUE event. The PI plan to collect data from all new residents meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria with voluntary participation to complete.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne-Gret Friedrich-Cuntz, EdD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Charlton Medical Center (Methodist Health System-
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Advice, P.R.N. (2004). Staff development: Mock code, real value. Nursing2004
Carroll L, Pignataro S. Use of portable simulation manikins to increase the frequency of mock code training on four inpatient surgical units. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2009 Jun;40(6):250-1. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20090522-04.
Carney P. Mock code: a game that saves lives. RN (For Managers). 1983 Jul;46(7):18P. No abstract available.
Cardoza MP, Hood PA. Comparative study of baccalaureate nursing student self-efficacy before and after simulation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182388936.
Franklin AE, Burns P, Lee CS. Psychometric testing on the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Oct;34(10):1298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
Hill CR, Dickter L, Van Daalen EM. A matter of life and death: the implementation of a Mock Code Blue Program in acute care. Medsurg Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;19(5):300-2, 304. No abstract available.
Huseman KF. Improving code blue response through the use of simulation. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2012 May-Jun;28(3):120-4. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182551506.
Kakora-Shiner N. Using ward-based simulation in cardiopulmonary training. Nurs Stand. 2009 May 27-Jun 2;23(38):42-7. doi: 10.7748/ns2009.05.23.38.42.c6975.
Marsch SC, Muller C, Marquardt K, Conrad G, Tschan F, Hunziker PR. Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests. Resuscitation. 2004 Jan;60(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.08.004.
Ngo DQ, Vu C, Nguyen T, Sotolongo P, Talati M, Zahabi N, Platt K. The Effect of Mock Code Blue Simulations and Dedicated Advanced Cardiac Life Support Didactics on Resident Perceived Competency. Cureus. 2020 Nov 25;12(11):e11705. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11705.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
008.NUR.2022.C
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.