Resistance Exercise Training to Improve Bone and Articular Cartilage Health in Women

NCT ID: NCT05889598

Last Updated: 2023-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) and osteoporosis (weak and fragile bones) are common conditions, particularly in women after menopause, and become even more common as we get older. Aging is also associated with sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle strength and mass with age. In this three-arm study, the effect of resistance exercise programs with different parameters (such as velocity and load) on various outcomes, including structural changes (bone mineral density, cartilage composition, muscle size), physical function, and biomarkers will be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Resistance exercise is effective in improving several risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, and is recommended to prevent and manage both conditions, and is also known to counteract sarcopenia. Overall, there is little and inconsistent evidence on the effects of exercise parameters (such as velocity) for the prevention of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, neither is there a comparison of different velocities on structural parameters and biomarkers. Although osteoporosis and osteoarthritis take a long time to develop, it is possible to look at changes in risk using scans of bones and joints -Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-, blood and/or urine samples and symptoms.

This study aims to examine the effect of two different resistance exercise interventions (explosive high-velocity vs high-load low-velocity training) on structural changes on bone, articular knee and/or hip cartilage and muscle, as well as biomarkers.

The study will be a 32-week long randomized controlled trial including two exercise groups and one non-exercising control group.

Screening and baseline measurements will then be taken when anonymization is completed. Once participants have completed baseline testing, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the exercise groups or control groups using a block randomization technique. Participants will choose an envelope, prepared in batches of 11, which will contain a note saying either 'ballistic' or 'conventional or 'control' with a ratio of 4:4:3. This is to allow for greater drop-out in the exercise groups. It is not possible to blind the participant or researchers supervising the intervention to the group allocation.

The required exercise program involves two supervised sessions per week at Loughborough University, each lasting no longer than 60 minutes per session. Each session will involve 30-40 minutes of exercise and time to check any symptoms or queries with participants.

The exercises are designed to strengthen major muscle groups of the trunk and lower body, as well as to load bones that are affected by osteoporosis and the knee and hip joints that are commonly affected by osteoarthritis. Each exercise training session will take 30-40 minutes and include some whole-body warm-up and trunk exercises before completing the two main exercises: a hack squat and calf raise. These two main exercises will be done using resistance (weight training) machines in a dedicated exercise facility. Investigators chose a hack squat machine as it exercises many muscle groups and skeletal sites in one exercise, including the spine and lower limb rather than a small area. Additionally, it supports the spine, making it safe and comfortable to use.

The intervention will be personalized to the individual's ability, and loads will steadily increase as the participant improves. The load will be decided according to maximal muscular strength determined by calculation of 1-repetition maximum which will be renewed every month to monitor the progress of their muscle strength and use of the correct weight for training (in proportion to the strength). Participants will start off using light weights and these will increase as participants become stronger.

The two exercise groups will follow the same exercise programmes but using different speeds and weights: The conventional training group will perform the exercises slowly (conventionally), whilst the ballistic group will use lower loads and higher velocity as if trying to jump. Participants will be carefully guided and coached to perform all the exercises correctly and all the exercise training sessions will be supervised by qualified researchers to ensure safety throughout the study.

The control group will be asked to maintain their usual exercise and diet. Follow-up measurements will take place 16 and 32 weeks after the commencement of the exercise programme.

The sample size calculation is based on detecting differences in bone mineral density between each exercise group and the control group. Using an effect size of 0.75 (considered clinically meaningful), alpha of 0.05, and beta errors of 0.95, approximately 28 participants are needed for each group. However, the final sample size should cover a possible number of withdrawals. To allow for a 30% drop-out rate in exercise groups, 110 participants will be recruited for the study.

All data will be reported in the final work; any missing data will be accounted for with reasons for it missing. All measures described in the methodology will be reported, whether results are statistically significant or not. Data from all eligible participants will be included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Multiple imputation will be used for addressing the presence of missing data. The analysis will be repeated in good adherers i.e. those who attended at least 90% of the exercise sessions.

Descriptive statistics will be calculated to give information on mean values and variation (standard deviation) of the cohort. Normal distribution will be analysed using Shapiro-Wilk test. If variance is shown to be homogenous and distribution normal within the population then repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) will detect any significant differences between group (exercise versus control), time (baseline versus post-intervention) or group x time interaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ballistic resistance exercise training

This arm will perform the exercises in a hack squat machine using low loads and explosive high-velocity (as if trying to jump)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ballistic Resistance Lower Body Strength Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The exercise programme involves two supervised sessions per week at University. Each session will involve 30-40 minutes of exercise, comprising warm-up , two main exercises: a hack squat and calf raise using a hack squat machine, and core exercises. After a warm-up period involving 5 minutes cycling and one set of 5 conventional repetitions at 40%1RM, the ballistic training group will complete eccentric phase hack squat exercise in approximately 3 seconds and the concentric phase as fast as possible with throwing type contractions. If participants can, participants will be allowed to take off in the concentric phase. To maintain high velocity in this group, lower loads will be used compared to the conventional group. The load will be decided according to regular maximal muscular strength test (1RM) to use of the correct weight for training (in proportion to the strength). Participants will start off using light weights and these will increase as participants become stronger.

Conventional resistance exercise training

This arm will perform the exercises in a hack squat machine using high-load and low-velocity (conventional training)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional Resistance Lower Body Strength Training

Intervention Type OTHER

The exercise programme involves two supervised sessions per week at Loughborough University. Each session will involve 30-40 minutes of exercise, comprising warm-up , two main exercises: a hack squat and calf raise using a hack squat machine, and core exercises. After a warm-up period involving 5 minutes cycling and one set of 5 conventional repetitions at 40% of 1RM, the conventional training group will complete eccentric and concentric phases of hack squatting exercises for approximately 3 seconds each, with appropriate breathing techniques. The load will be decided according to regular maximal muscular strength test (1RM) to use of the correct weight for training (in proportion to the strength). Participants will start off using light weights and these will increase as participants become stronger.

Control

Continue usual life

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ballistic Resistance Lower Body Strength Training

The exercise programme involves two supervised sessions per week at University. Each session will involve 30-40 minutes of exercise, comprising warm-up , two main exercises: a hack squat and calf raise using a hack squat machine, and core exercises. After a warm-up period involving 5 minutes cycling and one set of 5 conventional repetitions at 40%1RM, the ballistic training group will complete eccentric phase hack squat exercise in approximately 3 seconds and the concentric phase as fast as possible with throwing type contractions. If participants can, participants will be allowed to take off in the concentric phase. To maintain high velocity in this group, lower loads will be used compared to the conventional group. The load will be decided according to regular maximal muscular strength test (1RM) to use of the correct weight for training (in proportion to the strength). Participants will start off using light weights and these will increase as participants become stronger.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Resistance Lower Body Strength Training

The exercise programme involves two supervised sessions per week at Loughborough University. Each session will involve 30-40 minutes of exercise, comprising warm-up , two main exercises: a hack squat and calf raise using a hack squat machine, and core exercises. After a warm-up period involving 5 minutes cycling and one set of 5 conventional repetitions at 40% of 1RM, the conventional training group will complete eccentric and concentric phases of hack squatting exercises for approximately 3 seconds each, with appropriate breathing techniques. The load will be decided according to regular maximal muscular strength test (1RM) to use of the correct weight for training (in proportion to the strength). Participants will start off using light weights and these will increase as participants become stronger.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women between 50-70 years;
* Experienced last menstrual cycle, hormonal contraception or menopausal hormone replacement therapy at least five years ago;
* Independent living and able to come into the university;
* Healthy women: not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis or knee osteoarthritis, other major medical conditions;
* Able to understand English.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any existing symptomatic knee, hip, back injury or any medical conditions or injuries which would affect the ability or safety to perform exercise or influence bone/cartilage, including unstable angina, uncontrolled hypertension, a history of heart failure, and a history of cardiovascular disease and conditions;
* Taking medication affecting bone/cartilage metabolism;
* Regular (\>once per week on average) participation in resistance training with loading greater than bodyweight or in high impact (impact greater than jogging);
* Blood pressure exceeding 150/90 mmHg;
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2;
* Contraindications to MRI or DXA (e.g. Metallic implants);
* Osteoporotic (FRAX score according to which the participant would be advised to seek treatment);
* Fracture within the past year.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Versus Arthritis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Loughborough University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katherine Brooke-Wavell

Senior Lecturer in Human Biology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katherine Brooke-Wavell, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loughborough University

Jonathan Folland, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loughborough University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loughborough University

Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marques EA, Caliskan O, Brooke-Wavell K, Folland J. Feasibility of ballistic vs conventional resistance training in healthy postmenopausal women: A three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. Maturitas. 2025 May;196:108246. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108246. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40106971 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

304156

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Female Muscle Enhancement
NCT05397418 COMPLETED NA
Functional Exercise for Sarcopenia
NCT05570136 RECRUITING NA