Metacognitive Training in Ultra-high Risk

NCT ID: NCT05827900

Last Updated: 2024-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-21

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this pilot study is to examine whether metacognitive training can improve symptoms, wellbeing and functioning in individuals with attenuated psychotic symptoms. Metacognitive group training is an intervention designed to raise awareness on and change cognitive biases that may foster the development of psychotic symptoms such as delusions. It has been shown to be helpful in people with manifest psychosis. The main goal is to assess whether this training is prone to reducing symptoms in individuals at risk for psychosis. Participants will be randomized either to treatment as usual or to treatment as usual plus metacognitive training. Follow-ups will be performed over the period of one year.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Different metacognitive distortions similar to those of patients with schizophrenia could be shown in individuals with attenuated psychotic symptoms at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) including more dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs, overconfidence in judgements, a jumping-to- conclusion reasoning style associated with impaired working memory, a metamemory bias and intolerance of uncertainty. Recent research points towards a positive effect of metacognitive training (MCT) on positive symptoms, data gathering and delusions in patients with schizophrenia by raising awareness for cognitive biases.

Aims: The aim of this study is to examine whether metacognitive training can improve psychopathology in individuals with attenuated psychotic symptoms via changes in metacognitive biases and beliefs. Study design: The study is randomized-controlled, prospective.

Methods: 15 individuals fulfilling UHR criteria will be randomly assigned to a group receiving MCT+treatment as usual (TAU) at an early psychosis clinic for a duration of approximately 8-12 weeks and 15 individuals fulfilling UHR criteria will receive TAU only. Both groups will undergo psychiatric assessments to exclude current or past psychiatric disorders as well as psychosis threshold and current psychopathology. Also, an assessment of IQ, psychosocial functioning and metacognitive biases and beliefs will be done. Assessments will be done at baseline, after 12, 26 and 52 weeks.

Study sample: The study sample will consist of 30 individuals at UHR between 16 and 40 years of age.

Main outcome variable: Changes in the positive subscale score as a measure of positive symptoms of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Secondary outcome variables: (i) Changes in SOFAS score; (ii) Changes in metacognitive biases and beliefs; (iii) Changes in PANSS total score Power analysis: The aim of this pilot study is to better understand the magnitude of the treatment effect and its variability, such that future studies can be properly powered. A sample size of 15 in each group was decided upon, with an asymptotic, two-sided 95% confidence interval.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis Clinical High Risk for Psychosis At-risk Mental State

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized prospective
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Metacognitive Group Training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Metacognitive Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Minimum of 6 sessions; but planned 10-12 sessions of metacognitive group training

Treatment as usual

Treatment as usual

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Metacognitive Training

Minimum of 6 sessions; but planned 10-12 sessions of metacognitive group training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(i) Age 16-40 years; (ii) individuals belonging to either one of the following two groups:

* attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS): Experience of subthreshold, attenuated forms of positive psychotic symptoms including ideas of reference, odd beliefs or magical thinking, perceptual disturbance, paranoid ideation, odd thinking and speech, odd behavior and appearance, at least several times per week within the last year, present for at least one week and no longer than five years, according to the criteria operationalized in the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) interview (Yung et al., 2003);
* brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS): Episodes of frank psychotic symptoms that have not lasted longer than a week and have spontaneously abated, according to the criteria operationalized in the CAARMS interview (Yung et al., 2003); (iii) ability to give informed consent and to follow study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

(i) Past history of a treated or untreated manifest psychotic episode of one week's duration or longer (ii) Increases of dosages of antipsychotic medications - if any is given at all - within the last two weeks and/or clinical necessity for dosage increases at time of inclusion; (iii) Past neuroleptic exposure exceeding a total lifetime haloperidol dose of 50 mg (equivalent doses as referred to in Gardner, Murphy, O'Donnell, Centorrino, and Baldessarini (2010)); (iv) Acute suicidality or acute aggressive behavior; (v) Current attenuated symptoms that are entirely explained by acute intoxication (e.g., current attenuated symptoms entirely explained by LSD use) (vi) Organic brain disease (e.g. epilepsy, inflammatory brain disease etc.); (vii) Any other physical illness with psychotropic effect, if not stabilized; (viii) Diagnosis of a serious developmental disorder, e.g. Asperger ́s syndrome; (ix) Premorbid IQ lower than 70; (x) Inadequate knowledge of German language
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nilufar Mossaheb

Assoc.Prof Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nilufar Mossaheb, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical Univ. Vienna, Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nilufar Mossaheb, MD

Role: CONTACT

+4340400 ext. 351490

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Christian Scharinger

Role: primary

Nilufar Mossaheb, MD

Role: primary

+4314040036030

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MCT in UHR 130323

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Is Cognitive Training an Option?
NCT05352568 COMPLETED NA