Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-21
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Personalized Metacognitive Training for Psychosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07146802
The Effectiveness of the Meta-cognitive Training Among Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
NCT02187692
Metacognitive Training in Schizophrenia
NCT01029067
Effectiveness of Meta-Cognitive Training (EMC) in People With Psychosis of Brief Evolution.
NCT02340559
Minnesota Community-Based Cognitive Training in Early Psychosis
NCT03079024
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aims: The aim of this study is to examine whether metacognitive training can improve psychopathology in individuals with attenuated psychotic symptoms via changes in metacognitive biases and beliefs. Study design: The study is randomized-controlled, prospective.
Methods: 15 individuals fulfilling UHR criteria will be randomly assigned to a group receiving MCT+treatment as usual (TAU) at an early psychosis clinic for a duration of approximately 8-12 weeks and 15 individuals fulfilling UHR criteria will receive TAU only. Both groups will undergo psychiatric assessments to exclude current or past psychiatric disorders as well as psychosis threshold and current psychopathology. Also, an assessment of IQ, psychosocial functioning and metacognitive biases and beliefs will be done. Assessments will be done at baseline, after 12, 26 and 52 weeks.
Study sample: The study sample will consist of 30 individuals at UHR between 16 and 40 years of age.
Main outcome variable: Changes in the positive subscale score as a measure of positive symptoms of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Secondary outcome variables: (i) Changes in SOFAS score; (ii) Changes in metacognitive biases and beliefs; (iii) Changes in PANSS total score Power analysis: The aim of this pilot study is to better understand the magnitude of the treatment effect and its variability, such that future studies can be properly powered. A sample size of 15 in each group was decided upon, with an asymptotic, two-sided 95% confidence interval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Metacognitive Group Training
Metacognitive Training
Minimum of 6 sessions; but planned 10-12 sessions of metacognitive group training
Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metacognitive Training
Minimum of 6 sessions; but planned 10-12 sessions of metacognitive group training
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS): Experience of subthreshold, attenuated forms of positive psychotic symptoms including ideas of reference, odd beliefs or magical thinking, perceptual disturbance, paranoid ideation, odd thinking and speech, odd behavior and appearance, at least several times per week within the last year, present for at least one week and no longer than five years, according to the criteria operationalized in the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) interview (Yung et al., 2003);
* brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS): Episodes of frank psychotic symptoms that have not lasted longer than a week and have spontaneously abated, according to the criteria operationalized in the CAARMS interview (Yung et al., 2003); (iii) ability to give informed consent and to follow study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nilufar Mossaheb
Assoc.Prof Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nilufar Mossaheb, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Univ. Vienna, Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Vienna, , Austria
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Christian Scharinger
Role: primary
Nilufar Mossaheb, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MCT in UHR 130323
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.