Effect of Individual Cognitive Stimulation at Home in Adults With Psychotic Disorders
NCT ID: NCT04783285
Last Updated: 2022-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-29
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Personalized Psychological Treatment for Psychosis
NCT06603922
Cognitive Determinants of Psychoeducation and Information in Psychoses
NCT00646256
Transcranial Direct and Alternating Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex for Cognitive Improvement in Schizophrenia
NCT05342727
Mindfulness-based Social Cognition Training for Psychosis (SocialMind): A Feasibility Study
NCT03434405
A Study of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Adaptation Training in Early Intervention for Psychosis
NCT02430935
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is important to include psychologists and neuropsychologists in multidisciplinary teams, in actions related to mental health promotion and mental illness prevention programs, so that they can provide more comprehensive interventions for other effects of chronic mental health conditions, such as cognitive decline.
There is evidence linking psychotic disorders to impairments in functioning in most cognitive domains, including memory, executive functions, and attention, and that cognitive ageing in some areas may be accelerated in individuals with psychotic disorders. Thus, it is important to focus interventions on cognitive functioning in patients with psychosis, even after acute psychotic symptoms have improved. Executive functions appear to be of particular importance in the context of mental health problems, as they appear to be particularly integral for psychosocial functioning and the completion of instrumental activities of daily living. There is evidence that CS interventions in individual format are associated with greater effectiveness.
Many studies have supported the effectiveness and accessibility of home-based interventions in people with chronic mental illness. Yet, there are few published studies on continuous intervention in people with chronic mental illness and even more limited knowledge of how cognitive stimulation can help chronic mental health patients, including those with psychosis, to function.
One Portuguese study about the effect of an individual CS program in a home setting on cognitive and mood functioning in adults with psychotic disorders was tested, showed encouraging results and presented in detail an intervention protocol. However, it also presents some important limitations (e.g., convenience sample, lack of follow-up evaluation).
This study aims to overcome those limitations, through a randomised controlled trial, and, in addition to testing the effect of the CS program on global cognition, it also aims to assess its effect on emotional state, daily functioning, and quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the intervention group receiving CS or to a control group receiving treatment as usual. Participants in the intervention group will participate in two CS sessions per week for 16 weeks besides their treatment as usual. The sessions will be based on the existing protocol.
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST)
The intervention group will receive 32 individual CS sessions per participant. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes and will have the following structure: session introduction (5 minutes); reality orientation (10 minutes); stimulation of cognitive domain (25 minutes); session closure (5 minutes). The sessions will be led by a previously trained therapist. The intervention program will include several activities based on the principles of CS and adjusted for participants with psychotic disorders.
Control Group
Participants assigned to the control group will maintain their usual treatment: social interaction activities, stimulation of personal skills, and any prescribed psychotic-specific medication.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST)
The intervention group will receive 32 individual CS sessions per participant. Each session will last approximately 45 minutes and will have the following structure: session introduction (5 minutes); reality orientation (10 minutes); stimulation of cognitive domain (25 minutes); session closure (5 minutes). The sessions will be led by a previously trained therapist. The intervention program will include several activities based on the principles of CS and adjusted for participants with psychotic disorders.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders according to the criteria of DSM-5 (APA, 2013), determined by a professional clinician.
* Willing to participate in all intervention and assessment sessions.
* Provided informed consent.
* Native speakers of Portuguese.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe sensory and physical limitations that prevent participation in the sessions.
* Severe disconnection with the environment and very limited attentional level.
* Inability to communicate adequately.
* Psychoactive substance use.
* Currently participating in another study.
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CEDIARA - Assoc. Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susana I Justo Henriques, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra
Ana E Marques Castro, M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cediara - Associação de Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas
Enrique Pérez Sáez, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Reference Centre for Alzheimer's and Dementia Care, Imserso, Spain
Janessa O Carvalho, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, USA
Ana P Sargaço Mendes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cediara - Social Solidarity Association of Ribeira de Fráguas
Albergaria-a-Velha, Aveiro District, Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20210218
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.