Responders to Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Parkinson Disease
NCT ID: NCT05733819
Last Updated: 2024-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-17
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Amped-PD: Amplifying Physical Activity Through Music in Parkinson Disease
NCT05421624
Effects and Mechanisms of RAS Training on Upper-limb Movements in PD Patients
NCT05782322
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Neural Activity During Finger-tapping in PD Patients
NCT05839821
Long-term Training Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT03316365
Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing on Stepping in Place in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT03271736
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) is a rehabilitation intervention that, unlike pharmacologic treatment, has shown promise for improving walking in PD. Walking with RAS intervention has been shown to improve walking function, particularly walking speed. RAS relies on the robust human capacity to synchronize movements to an external rhythm (i.e., walking to a regular auditory beat), a process referred to as auditory-motor entrainment. Due to the body's preference to select a walking frequency that maximizes stability and minimizes energy expenditure, rhythmic entrainment may stabilize gait patterns and reduce the metabolic cost of walking. Moreover, rhythmic entrainment is thought to reduce the attentional demand of walking in persons with PD, allowing for attention to be allocated to secondary tasks essential for safe community navigation. Despite evidence of the effectiveness of improving walking speed and gait function, the biomechanical changes that enable this improvement are not well understood.
Moreover, while RAS is an effective treatment, not everyone benefits from the treatment equally. Individuals with PD have a wide variety of gait presentations, and gait impairment may affect the efficacy of RAS treatment. In this study, the investigators want to understand who responds to RAS interventions and if the investigators can identify these responders from baseline measurements. For this analysis, the investigators define responders in three ways: (1) individuals who increase walking function, (2) individuals who increase gait quality, or (3) individuals who increase both gait quality and walking function while walking to personalized RAS. The investigators hypothesize that individuals who increase walking function and/or gait quality while walking to personalized RAS are more likely to be responsive to long-term intervention with RAS; however, the mechanism of action that enables the long-term response is hypothesized to be different based on baseline deficits. The investigators posit that the short-term responses to RAS measured in this study may suggest potential long-term mechanisms.
Study Protocol:
To examine the different effects of the intervention, each participant will complete a data collection session with a series of clinical tests including the Mini-BEST, UPDRS, the 10-m walk test (10MWT) at comfortable and fast walking speed, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to quantity baseline function. Moreover, the 6MWT will be fully instrumented using motion capture cameras that track retro-reflective markers, wireless inertial measurement units, and force plates embedded in the walkway---together, these systems will enable concurrent collection of gait kinematic, inertial, and kinetic signals respectively. Additionally, metabolic measures will be collected during the 6MWT. After the baseline 6-minute walk test, participants will wear a custom, simple RAS device that will use a metronome application and bone-conducting headphones to provide auditory cues designed to modulate the participant's walking cadence. The auditory cues provided will be subject-specific based on a tuning procedure. Finally, the 6MWT will be repeated with RAS set to the optimally selected cadence based on the tuning procedure.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of personalized RAS on walking function (i.e., 6MWT total distance) and gait quality (i.e., stride time variability). The investigators will also evaluate RAS-induced changes in other, secondary gait quality metrics: (1) the metabolic cost of transport, (2) walking ground reaction forces, (3) joint kinetics, and (4) distance-induced changes in spatial-temporal gait parameters. A secondary objective is to determine if RAS-induced changes in walking function and/or gait quality are related to specific patterns of baseline walking and gait impairment (i.e., movement phenotypes).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Walking without personalized rhythmic auditory stimulation
Subjects will complete a 6MWT without any auditory cues
Active Walking
Walking without RAS cueing
Walking with personalized rhythmic auditory stimulation
Subjects will complete a 6MWT with personalized rhythmic auditory cues
Subject-specific optimized RAS
Walking with metronome-based RAS cueing
Active Walking
Walking without RAS cueing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subject-specific optimized RAS
Walking with metronome-based RAS cueing
Active Walking
Walking without RAS cueing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (self-report)
* The ability to walk continuously without another individual supporting the person's body weight for at least 6 minutes. Assistive devices, such as a cane, are allowed.
Exclusion Criteria
* Parkinson's disease, score \< 23 on the MMSE.
* Pain that impairs walking ability (as assessed by a licensed physical therapist)
* Unexplained dizziness in the last 6 months (self-report)
* Severe comorbidities that may interfere with the ability to participate (musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurological)
* More than 2 falls in the previous month
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Terry Ellis, PT, PhD
UNKNOWN
Boston University Charles River Campus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lou Awad, PT, DPT, PhD
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boston University Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shulman LM, Gruber-Baldini AL, Anderson KE, Vaughan CG, Reich SG, Fishman PS, Weiner WJ. The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord. 2008 Apr 30;23(6):790-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.21879.
Shulman LM. Understanding disability in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25 Suppl 1:S131-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.22789.
Lord S, Godfrey A, Galna B, Mhiripiri D, Burn D, Rochester L. Ambulatory activity in incident Parkinson's: more than meets the eye? J Neurol. 2013 Dec;260(12):2964-72. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7037-5. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Cavanaugh JT, Ellis TD, Earhart GM, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Dibble LE. Capturing ambulatory activity decline in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;36(2):51-7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318254ba7a.
Cochen De Cock V, Dotov D, Damm L, Lacombe S, Ihalainen P, Picot MC, Galtier F, Lebrun C, Giordano A, Driss V, Geny C, Garzo A, Hernandez E, Van Dyck E, Leman M, Villing R, Bardy BG, Dalla Bella S. BeatWalk: Personalized Music-Based Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 26;12:655121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655121. eCollection 2021.
Forte R, Tocci N, De Vito G. The Impact of Exercise Intervention with Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation to Improve Gait and Mobility in Parkinson Disease: An Umbrella Review. Brain Sci. 2021 May 22;11(6):685. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060685.
Nonnekes J, Nieuwboer A. Towards Personalized Rehabilitation for Gait Impairments in Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(s1):S101-S106. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181464.
Port RJ, Rumsby M, Brown G, Harrison IF, Amjad A, Bale CJ. People with Parkinson's Disease: What Symptoms Do They Most Want to Improve and How Does This Change with Disease Duration? J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(2):715-724. doi: 10.3233/JPD-202346.
Burrai F, Apuzzo L, Zanotti R. Effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Holist Nurs Pract. 2024 Mar-Apr 01;38(2):109-119. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000462. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Ye X, Li L, He R, Jia Y, Poon W. Rhythmic auditory stimulation promotes gait recovery in Parkinson's patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 28;13:940419. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.940419. eCollection 2022.
Erra C, Mileti I, Germanotta M, Petracca M, Imbimbo I, De Biase A, Rossi S, Ricciardi D, Pacilli A, Di Sipio E, Palermo E, Bentivoglio AR, Padua L. Immediate effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait kinematics in Parkinson's disease ON/OFF medication. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct;130(10):1789-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Nombela C, Hughes LE, Owen AM, Grahn JA. Into the groove: can rhythm influence Parkinson's disease? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2564-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Ashoori A, Eagleman DM, Jankovic J. Effects of Auditory Rhythm and Music on Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015 Nov 11;6:234. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00234. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4440-PD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.