Effects of Ecological Rythmic-acoustic Stimulation (E-RAS) on Motor Skills in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT03228888
Last Updated: 2017-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-01
2017-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety or Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) for Gait and Balance Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
NCT03278639
Effects and Mechanisms of RAS Training on Upper-limb Movements in PD Patients
NCT05782322
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Neural Activity During Finger-tapping in PD Patients
NCT05839821
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Upper-limb Movements in PD Patients
NCT05637593
Responders to Rhythmic Auditory Cueing in Parkinson Disease
NCT05733819
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Artificial Sounds
Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played a metronome tick at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence.
Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.
Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player
Ecological Sounds
Participants were provided headphones and a portable MP3 device which played an ecological rhythmic sound obtained by actual footsteps of human at specified rhythm calculated as follows: a) if a patient's cadence was below the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value of 10% higher than one's own cadence; b) if a patient's cadence was below, but close to normality (less than 10% difference), the BPM of the stimulus was set at normality values; c) if a patient's cadence was above the normality, the BPM of the stimulus was set at a value equal to one's own cadence.
Participants performed daily 30 minutes of walking assisted by the rhythmic acoustic stimuli.
Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Administration of rhytmic acoustic stimuli for gait training
The intervention consist in 5 weeks, 20 min/day gait training assisted by rhythmic acoustic stimuli administered using a portable MP3 player
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ability to walk independently;
* absence of relevant hearing impairments which could prevent the correct perception of the auditory cues;
* absence of significant cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) \> 24; Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) \> 13);
* absence of psychiatric or severe systemic illnesses;
* mild-to-moderate disability assessed by means of the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H\&Y) staging scale (1,5 ≤ H\&Y ≤ 3);
* no engagement in any rehabilitative program in the 3 months before the beginning of the study
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cagliari
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Massimiliano Pau
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
General Hospital "G. Brotzu"
Cagliari, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Murgia M, Pili R, Corona F, Sors F, Agostini TA, Bernardis P, Casula C, Cossu G, Guicciardi M, Pau M. The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2018 May 24;9:348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00348. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PG/2014/17870
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.