The Effect of Noise Pollution on Lung Sound Recognition by Medical Students
NCT ID: NCT05731193
Last Updated: 2023-11-09
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
52 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2023-02-07
Study Completion Date
2023-04-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Title: The Effect of White Noise on the Ability of a Medical Student to Recognise Correctly Adventitious Lung Sound.
Methodology: Randomized, controlled trial, blind study.
Study Duration: The estimated duration for the main protocol (e.g., from the start of screening to the last subject processed and finishing the study) is approximately 4 weeks.
Study Centre: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LSMU) and Kaunas Hospital of LSMU.
Objectives: Primary Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of second-year and third-year medical students in correctly identifying pathological and nonpathological lung sounds under different white noise levels.
Number of Subjects: A group of 104 students will be exposed (EXP) to learning pathological and nonpathological sounds for 3 days. After 3 days students will take 3 tests with different levels of white noise pollution added ( signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 20, 40 and none added).
Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria: male and female second and third-year LSMU students; 18-40 years old; in any distribution. Consent and compliance with all aspects of the study protocol, and methods, providing data during follow-up contact. Please, see the methods section for a full list of inclusion criteria. Exclusion Criteria: deafness; age over 40; conditions that prevent the student from using earphones. Please, see the methods section for a full list of exclusion criteria.
Regimen: EXP group will receive 3-day training of 101 lung sounds.
Statistical Methodology: Results will be analyzed with the SPSS (version 27) and Jamovi (version 2.3.21). A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The effect of 3 levels of white noise on the EXP group will be compared utilizing a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test. Though, if data does not adhere to a normal distribution then Kruskal - Wallis will be applied. McNemar's test will be used to compare if there was a statistical difference between second-year and third-year students.
Methodology: Randomized, controlled trial, blind study.
Study Duration: The estimated duration for the main protocol (e.g., from the start of screening to the last subject processed and finishing the study) is approximately 4 weeks.
Study Centre: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LSMU) and Kaunas Hospital of LSMU.
Objectives: Primary Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of second-year and third-year medical students in correctly identifying pathological and nonpathological lung sounds under different white noise levels.
Number of Subjects: A group of 104 students will be exposed (EXP) to learning pathological and nonpathological sounds for 3 days. After 3 days students will take 3 tests with different levels of white noise pollution added ( signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 20, 40 and none added).
Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria: male and female second and third-year LSMU students; 18-40 years old; in any distribution. Consent and compliance with all aspects of the study protocol, and methods, providing data during follow-up contact. Please, see the methods section for a full list of inclusion criteria. Exclusion Criteria: deafness; age over 40; conditions that prevent the student from using earphones. Please, see the methods section for a full list of exclusion criteria.
Regimen: EXP group will receive 3-day training of 101 lung sounds.
Statistical Methodology: Results will be analyzed with the SPSS (version 27) and Jamovi (version 2.3.21). A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The effect of 3 levels of white noise on the EXP group will be compared utilizing a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test. Though, if data does not adhere to a normal distribution then Kruskal - Wallis will be applied. McNemar's test will be used to compare if there was a statistical difference between second-year and third-year students.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Medical Students to Identify Pathological Lung Sound Over a Period of Time
NCT05731180
Lung Sound
UNKNOWN
NA
Are Medical Personnel Can Correctly Recognize the Chest Sounds?
NCT02703285
Respiration, Artificial
UNKNOWN
NA
Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education
NCT06359158
Auscultation
Breathing Sound
Asthma
+2 more
COMPLETED
NA
Increasing Medical Student Well-being Through Gratitude Journaling
NCT03240705
Stress, Psychological
COMPLETED
NA
One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching
NCT07305077
Clinical Teaching
Bedside Teaching
Medical Education
RECRUITING
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of second-year and third-year students in correctly identifying pathological and nonpathological lung sounds under different white noise levels.
Background Auscultation is one of the four pillars of patient examination \[1, 2, 3\], and is particularly during the pulmonary objective investigation. Today, the assessment of auscultation sounds remains subjective and depends on the qualifications and expertise of a specialist \[4, 5\]. Arts et al. \[6\] authors recommend leaving the practice of traditional auscultation to experienced specialists since sensitivity is as low as 37% when identifying between normal cases and several lung pathologies. Hospitals can have a lot of white noise which easily exceed WHO recommendation \[7\]. Though some research shows that physicians can adapt to extreme loudness \[9\].
There is a lack of research in clinical settings on noise levels' effect on lung sound recognition by healthcare workers.
Hence our research is interested to investigate the effect of white noise (WN) at 3 different levels (SNR 20,40, none) on medical students' ability to correctly identify various lung sounds.
Goals of the study To evaluate the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of second-year and third-year medical to correctly identify lung sounds under three different WN levels.
Duration of the Study The study is estimated to complete enrolment within 3 weeks from study initiation; however, enrolment will remain open until the study goal is met. The duration of this study for each subject will be a maximum of 4 weeks.
Product Description Commercially available various earphones, mobile phones and PC will be used by the students. These products have been acquired by students before the research.
Product Intended Use The students' mobile phones, laptops, and PCs will be used to access the SAITI website. Their earphones will be utilized to listen to lung sounds.
Product Acquisition The product was acquired by students before the study with their finances for personal use.
Potential Benefits and Risks to Students There are no potential risks to the students. A potential benefit for the student is their ability to learn how to identify pathological lung sounds earlier in their medical career as compared to their peers.
Methods: Study design A single-arm study involving 35 students and 101 lung sound recordings. The lung sounds will be used for training students and then assessing their accuracy to identify pathological sounds correctly.
Creation of a lung sound database for teaching and assessment purposes: a total of 84 patients \& 504 lung sounds were recorded by an Internal Medicine physician. Permission was obtained for the study from Kaunas' Regional Bioethics committee (P1-BE-2-57/2021). All participating parties signed the bioethics agreement forms. The lung sounds were recorded in the wards of the LSMU Kaunas Hospital using a 3M Littmann model 3200 electronic stethoscope. Each of the 504 recordings was 15 seconds long. Once all lung sounds were recorded, a double-blind review was initiated. During this process, 101 lung sounds were selected by a family physician. The family physician had to listen to the lung sounds and judge if she heard crackles, wheezes, and no adventitious. The additional criterion in judging was if the lung sounds were "good enough" quality for teaching purposes or not. The cases were used for training purposes if both the Internal Medicine physician and the Family physician were in agreement.
All students studying in LSMU in the 2nd- and 3rd-years will be invited to participate in the study.
Study population and selection criteria: all aspects of the study and consent forms will be IRB-approved before implementation. All participants will require full informed consent, be willing and able to comply with all study requirements and will meet the following criteria; male or female aged 18-40 (inclusive), must be LSMU students studying in 2nd and 3rd year. Subjects will be excluded from the study based on the following criteria:
* Not a student at LSMU
* Not studying in 2nd and 3rd year of medicine
* Age over 40-year-old.
* Deaf
* The subject does not provide full consent
* Recruitment methods
* Subjects will be identified and contacted through the Student Scientific Society and further contacted via emails.
The students will receive a test before training on the SAITI website. There will be two presentations. The first will be an introduction to the project and its explanation to the students. The second will be an introduction to lung sounds (normal lung sounds and adventitious ones). The duration of both presentations will be about 30 - 35 min each. The main topics will be to introduce the students to how the study is conducted, and what sort of pathological and nonpathological sounds they can expect during the learning and assessment process. The training will consist of 16 cases with 6-channel recordings for each patient and a single-channel individual lung 5 sounds (bronchovesicular, bronchial, vesicular, crackles, wheezes). The six-channel locations will be; 2 above the scapula, two between the shoulder blades and two below them. Each channel will be a single-point recording (15s) from an actual patient. The cases will consist of 4 patients with no pathologies, 4 cases with crackers, 3 cases with wheezes, 3 cases with mixed pathologies (wheezes and crackles) and 2 control cases but with sonic artifacts. The students will have access to the site for 3 days. They will be advised to spend 45 to 90 min on the website per day. The students after 3 days learning process will receive 3 exams with different levels of WN. The questions will be made of 9 cases: 3 cases without pathological lung sounds; 3 cases with wheezes; 3 cases with crackles. All questions will be randomised. The student will have to listen through all six channels and will have to choose the correct answer.
The number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives will be recorded.
Data will be collected on an excel spreadsheet system as the primary source of patient response collection. A dedicated hard-copy paper of the excel will be produced and kept as a backup.
Results Results will be analyzed with the SPSS (version 27) and Jamovi (version 2.3.21). A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The effect of 3 levels of white noise on the EXP group will be compared utilising a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test. Though, if data does not adhere to a normal distribution then Kruskal - Wallis will be applied. McNemar's test will be used to compare if there was a statistical difference between second-year and third-year medical students.
Data collection and reporting Data will be collected at the following points: Immediately after 4 days of training, on the fourth day, there will be 3 days where students will take 3 tests ( each test will have different levels of SNR 0,40,20). Data from the study will be maintained for two years after the date the investigation is completed, terminated or until the records are no longer required to support the protocol, whichever date is later.
Expected outcomes The study has the potential to measure the ability of second and third-year students to correctly identify pathological lung sounds under different WN levels.
Adverse reactions: none expected. The participants will use their equipment to listen to the lung sounds according to the parameters that manufacturers set up for the equipment.
Reasons for withdrawal or termination
A subject may be discontinued from the study at any time if the subject, Investigator feels that it is not in the subject's best interest to continue. The following is a list of possible reasons for study treatment discontinuation:
* screening Failure;
* subject withdrawal of consent;
* the subject is not compliant with study procedures;
* protocol violation requiring discontinuation. All subjects are free to withdraw from participation at any time, for any reason, specified or unspecified, and without prejudice. Reasonable attempts will be made by the Investigator to provide a reason for subject withdrawals. The reason for the subject's withdrawal from the study will be specified in the subject's source documents and the Case Report Form (CRF).
Premature Termination or Suspension of Study
This study may be suspended or prematurely terminated if there is sufficient reasonable cause. Written notification, documenting the reason for study suspension or termination, will be provided by the suspending, or terminating party to the investigator or the Institutional Review Board (IRB), as appropriate. If the study is prematurely terminated or suspended, the Investigator will promptly inform the IRB and will provide the reason(s) for the termination or suspension. Circumstances that may warrant termination or suspension include, but are not limited to:
* Insufficient compliance with protocol requirements;
* Data that are not sufficiently complete and/or evaluable;
Data handling and record keeping Only study personnel will collect data onto Excel spreadsheets. All spreadsheets will be encrypted and accessed only via a password. Only de-identified data will be used for data analysis. Statistical analysis will be performed on de-identified collected data.
Institutional review board The protocol, informed consent form(s), and all participant materials will be submitted to the IRB for review and approval. Approval of both the protocol and the consent form must be obtained before any participant is enrolled. Any amendment to the protocol will require review and approval by the IRB before the changes are implemented in the study. All changes to the consent form will be IRB approved; a determination will be made regarding whether previously consented participants need to be re-consented.
Protocol deviation All protocol deviations/violations will be documented using the Protocol Deviations/Violations CRF and submitted to the IRB according to their reporting guidelines.
Laws and regulations This clinical study will be conducted in compliance with all national laws and regulations of Lithuania in which the clinical trial is performed, as well as any applicable guidelines. The trial will be registered on www.clintrials.gov and other sites, as appropriate.
Publication and data sharing policy The preparation and submittal for publication of manuscripts containing the study results shall be by a process determined by mutual written agreement among the participating institutions. All publicly shared data will be de-personalized according to Lithuanian bioethics community regulations
Background Auscultation is one of the four pillars of patient examination \[1, 2, 3\], and is particularly during the pulmonary objective investigation. Today, the assessment of auscultation sounds remains subjective and depends on the qualifications and expertise of a specialist \[4, 5\]. Arts et al. \[6\] authors recommend leaving the practice of traditional auscultation to experienced specialists since sensitivity is as low as 37% when identifying between normal cases and several lung pathologies. Hospitals can have a lot of white noise which easily exceed WHO recommendation \[7\]. Though some research shows that physicians can adapt to extreme loudness \[9\].
There is a lack of research in clinical settings on noise levels' effect on lung sound recognition by healthcare workers.
Hence our research is interested to investigate the effect of white noise (WN) at 3 different levels (SNR 20,40, none) on medical students' ability to correctly identify various lung sounds.
Goals of the study To evaluate the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of second-year and third-year medical to correctly identify lung sounds under three different WN levels.
Duration of the Study The study is estimated to complete enrolment within 3 weeks from study initiation; however, enrolment will remain open until the study goal is met. The duration of this study for each subject will be a maximum of 4 weeks.
Product Description Commercially available various earphones, mobile phones and PC will be used by the students. These products have been acquired by students before the research.
Product Intended Use The students' mobile phones, laptops, and PCs will be used to access the SAITI website. Their earphones will be utilized to listen to lung sounds.
Product Acquisition The product was acquired by students before the study with their finances for personal use.
Potential Benefits and Risks to Students There are no potential risks to the students. A potential benefit for the student is their ability to learn how to identify pathological lung sounds earlier in their medical career as compared to their peers.
Methods: Study design A single-arm study involving 35 students and 101 lung sound recordings. The lung sounds will be used for training students and then assessing their accuracy to identify pathological sounds correctly.
Creation of a lung sound database for teaching and assessment purposes: a total of 84 patients \& 504 lung sounds were recorded by an Internal Medicine physician. Permission was obtained for the study from Kaunas' Regional Bioethics committee (P1-BE-2-57/2021). All participating parties signed the bioethics agreement forms. The lung sounds were recorded in the wards of the LSMU Kaunas Hospital using a 3M Littmann model 3200 electronic stethoscope. Each of the 504 recordings was 15 seconds long. Once all lung sounds were recorded, a double-blind review was initiated. During this process, 101 lung sounds were selected by a family physician. The family physician had to listen to the lung sounds and judge if she heard crackles, wheezes, and no adventitious. The additional criterion in judging was if the lung sounds were "good enough" quality for teaching purposes or not. The cases were used for training purposes if both the Internal Medicine physician and the Family physician were in agreement.
All students studying in LSMU in the 2nd- and 3rd-years will be invited to participate in the study.
Study population and selection criteria: all aspects of the study and consent forms will be IRB-approved before implementation. All participants will require full informed consent, be willing and able to comply with all study requirements and will meet the following criteria; male or female aged 18-40 (inclusive), must be LSMU students studying in 2nd and 3rd year. Subjects will be excluded from the study based on the following criteria:
* Not a student at LSMU
* Not studying in 2nd and 3rd year of medicine
* Age over 40-year-old.
* Deaf
* The subject does not provide full consent
* Recruitment methods
* Subjects will be identified and contacted through the Student Scientific Society and further contacted via emails.
The students will receive a test before training on the SAITI website. There will be two presentations. The first will be an introduction to the project and its explanation to the students. The second will be an introduction to lung sounds (normal lung sounds and adventitious ones). The duration of both presentations will be about 30 - 35 min each. The main topics will be to introduce the students to how the study is conducted, and what sort of pathological and nonpathological sounds they can expect during the learning and assessment process. The training will consist of 16 cases with 6-channel recordings for each patient and a single-channel individual lung 5 sounds (bronchovesicular, bronchial, vesicular, crackles, wheezes). The six-channel locations will be; 2 above the scapula, two between the shoulder blades and two below them. Each channel will be a single-point recording (15s) from an actual patient. The cases will consist of 4 patients with no pathologies, 4 cases with crackers, 3 cases with wheezes, 3 cases with mixed pathologies (wheezes and crackles) and 2 control cases but with sonic artifacts. The students will have access to the site for 3 days. They will be advised to spend 45 to 90 min on the website per day. The students after 3 days learning process will receive 3 exams with different levels of WN. The questions will be made of 9 cases: 3 cases without pathological lung sounds; 3 cases with wheezes; 3 cases with crackles. All questions will be randomised. The student will have to listen through all six channels and will have to choose the correct answer.
The number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives will be recorded.
Data will be collected on an excel spreadsheet system as the primary source of patient response collection. A dedicated hard-copy paper of the excel will be produced and kept as a backup.
Results Results will be analyzed with the SPSS (version 27) and Jamovi (version 2.3.21). A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The effect of 3 levels of white noise on the EXP group will be compared utilising a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test. Though, if data does not adhere to a normal distribution then Kruskal - Wallis will be applied. McNemar's test will be used to compare if there was a statistical difference between second-year and third-year medical students.
Data collection and reporting Data will be collected at the following points: Immediately after 4 days of training, on the fourth day, there will be 3 days where students will take 3 tests ( each test will have different levels of SNR 0,40,20). Data from the study will be maintained for two years after the date the investigation is completed, terminated or until the records are no longer required to support the protocol, whichever date is later.
Expected outcomes The study has the potential to measure the ability of second and third-year students to correctly identify pathological lung sounds under different WN levels.
Adverse reactions: none expected. The participants will use their equipment to listen to the lung sounds according to the parameters that manufacturers set up for the equipment.
Reasons for withdrawal or termination
A subject may be discontinued from the study at any time if the subject, Investigator feels that it is not in the subject's best interest to continue. The following is a list of possible reasons for study treatment discontinuation:
* screening Failure;
* subject withdrawal of consent;
* the subject is not compliant with study procedures;
* protocol violation requiring discontinuation. All subjects are free to withdraw from participation at any time, for any reason, specified or unspecified, and without prejudice. Reasonable attempts will be made by the Investigator to provide a reason for subject withdrawals. The reason for the subject's withdrawal from the study will be specified in the subject's source documents and the Case Report Form (CRF).
Premature Termination or Suspension of Study
This study may be suspended or prematurely terminated if there is sufficient reasonable cause. Written notification, documenting the reason for study suspension or termination, will be provided by the suspending, or terminating party to the investigator or the Institutional Review Board (IRB), as appropriate. If the study is prematurely terminated or suspended, the Investigator will promptly inform the IRB and will provide the reason(s) for the termination or suspension. Circumstances that may warrant termination or suspension include, but are not limited to:
* Insufficient compliance with protocol requirements;
* Data that are not sufficiently complete and/or evaluable;
Data handling and record keeping Only study personnel will collect data onto Excel spreadsheets. All spreadsheets will be encrypted and accessed only via a password. Only de-identified data will be used for data analysis. Statistical analysis will be performed on de-identified collected data.
Institutional review board The protocol, informed consent form(s), and all participant materials will be submitted to the IRB for review and approval. Approval of both the protocol and the consent form must be obtained before any participant is enrolled. Any amendment to the protocol will require review and approval by the IRB before the changes are implemented in the study. All changes to the consent form will be IRB approved; a determination will be made regarding whether previously consented participants need to be re-consented.
Protocol deviation All protocol deviations/violations will be documented using the Protocol Deviations/Violations CRF and submitted to the IRB according to their reporting guidelines.
Laws and regulations This clinical study will be conducted in compliance with all national laws and regulations of Lithuania in which the clinical trial is performed, as well as any applicable guidelines. The trial will be registered on www.clintrials.gov and other sites, as appropriate.
Publication and data sharing policy The preparation and submittal for publication of manuscripts containing the study results shall be by a process determined by mutual written agreement among the participating institutions. All publicly shared data will be de-personalized according to Lithuanian bioethics community regulations
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Lung Sound
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
LSMU second-year and third-year medical students will be invited to participate in a single-arm, diagnostic study. Students will be trained for 4 days to recognise nonpathological lung sounds. The training will be via two lectures and a simulation-based study's website. Following the 4-day learning interval, students will be assessed via 3 tests, each test having different levels of white noise.The number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives will be recorded with the goal to assess students' diagnostic accuracy in identifying adventitious lung sounds.
Primary Study Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Blinding Strategy
NONE
The subject will be assigned a unique screening/enrolment number.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exposed group (EXP)
Exposed group (EXP) - 35 students. EXP group will learn pathological and nonpathological sounds for 3 days.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Exposed group (EXP) - 35 students. EXP group will learn pathological and nonpathological sounds for 3 days.
Intervention Type
OTHER
After 3 days students will take 3 tests with different levels of white noise pollution added ( signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 20, 40 and none added)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposed group (EXP) - 35 students. EXP group will learn pathological and nonpathological sounds for 3 days.
After 3 days students will take 3 tests with different levels of white noise pollution added ( signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 20, 40 and none added)
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female second and third-year LSMU students;
* 18 years and older;
* subject that provides full written consent to participate in the study.
* 18 years and older;
* subject that provides full written consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* not a second-year or third-year at LSMU;
* deafness;
* age over 40;
* conditions that prevent students from using earphones;
* subject does not provide full consent.
* deafness;
* age over 40;
* conditions that prevent students from using earphones;
* subject does not provide full consent.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
40 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Haroldas Razvadauskas
Doctor of Medicine
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Kaunas, , Lithuania
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Lithuania
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;3(4):346-350. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0001.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
D. Pereira, P. Gomes, C. Sa Couto, O. Costa, Z. Reis, S. Mattos, R. Cruz-Correia, and M. Coimbra. IS4Learning-A Multiplatform Simulation Technology to Teach and Evaluate Auscultation Skills. In Health Professionals' Education in the Age of Clinical Information Systems Mobile Computing and Social Networks, pages 401-420. Elsevier, 2017. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805362-1.00019-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Garvick S, Gillette C, Gao H, Bates N, Waynick J, Crandall S. Can cardiac auscultation accuracy be improved with an additional app-based learning tool? Clin Teach. 2022 Apr;19(2):112-120. doi: 10.1111/tct.13462. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hafke-Dys H, Breborowicz A, Kleka P, Kocinski J, Biniakowski A. The accuracy of lung auscultation in the practice of physicians and medical students. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 12;14(8):e0220606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220606. eCollection 2019.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kim Y, Hyon Y, Jung SS, Lee S, Yoo G, Chung C, Ha T. Respiratory sound classification for crackles, wheezes, and rhonchi in the clinical field using deep learning. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 25;11(1):17186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96724-7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Arts L, Lim EHT, van de Ven PM, Heunks L, Tuinman PR. The diagnostic accuracy of lung auscultation in adult patients with acute pulmonary pathologies: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 30;10(1):7347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64405-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Darbyshire JL, Young JD. An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the WHO guidelines. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 3;17(5):R187. doi: 10.1186/cc12870.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(9):895-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03538.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zun LS, Downey L. The effect of noise in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):663-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.533.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
https://saititests.github.io/
Website used for simulation-based learning by the medical students in SAITI-WN study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAITI-WN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
The Impact of Alienation on the Psychological and Social Aspects and Quality of Life of Medical Students in Assuit University
NCT07334613
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma
NCT02288793
UNKNOWN
Improving Empathy and Relational Skills
NCT01304030
COMPLETED
NA
Micro-expression Reading Skill Training in Medical Students
NCT02601118
COMPLETED
NA
Impact of a Relation Training on Empathy of Medical Student
NCT02681380
COMPLETED
NA
Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-learning in Undergraduate Medical Education
NCT02971735
COMPLETED
NA
Growing Future Physician Leaders: A Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention in Postgraduate Trainees
NCT00286975
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Interprofessional Education of Medical Students Using Medical Simulation
NCT05817682
UNKNOWN
NA
An Educational Intervention to Improve the Use of Antibiotics in Portuguese Health Professional
NCT02173509
COMPLETED
NA
Learning Outcomes With Point-of-Care Ultrasound
NCT04021693
COMPLETED
NA
FoCo: Evaluating a Training to Increase Attention and Awareness of Healthcare Professionals
NCT04362397
COMPLETED
NA
The Impact of High Fidelity Simulation on Stress Level in Medical Students.
NCT04381572
COMPLETED
Mindfulness and Executive Functions for Prediction of Non-technical Skills of Students in Pediatric Medical Simulations
NCT03761355
COMPLETED
Validity Assessment of the "LabForGames Warning" Serious Game
NCT03092440
COMPLETED
The Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in Perioperative Management and Education
NCT06766539
RECRUITING
Use of Stress Inoculation Training in Medical Education
NCT04199221
TERMINATED
NA
The Evaluation of the Ultrasound-guided Clinical Procedure Simulation Curriculum
NCT04792203
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Trial of Educational Outcomes of WISE-MD
NCT01322230
COMPLETED
NA
Analysis of the Effect of Pre-course Videos on Improving Clinical Skills in Emergency Ultrasound Training
NCT06947733
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
Impact of Self-awareness in Medical Students
NCT05313971
COMPLETED
NA
Simulation-based Training Improves Competency in Communicating Bad News
NCT05648760
UNKNOWN
NA
Effect of Critical Thinking Disposition Program on Developing Reflective Thinking and Motivation to Learn Among Nursing Students
NCT07334158
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Non-technical Skills Training and Checklists Versus Standard Training With Checklists for Prevention of Medical Error
NCT04621682
COMPLETED
NA
Online Ultrasound Curriculum on Learning Outcomes of Post-graduate Physicians
NCT06950346
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills
NCT05275829
COMPLETED