Ecological Momentary Assessment in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT05695963

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder better characterized by an urge to move the legs at rest. Although treatments are available, many patients experience periods of symptoms relief and exacerbation. Whether this is due to the natural history of the disease or to health-related behaviors of daily life is presently unknown. The primary objective is to examine the feasibility of mobile technology to assess RLS symptoms severity fluctuations in daily life by collecting real-time data. The secondary objectives will be to examine the validity of this technic in the context of RLS and to use these real-time data to identify daily life risk factors for symptom onset or aggravation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Restless Legs Syndrome is a common sensorimotor disorder that disturbs sleep and quality of life. One of the key diagnostic criteria of RLS is the complaint of an irresistible urge to move the legs. This urge to move is often triggered by unpleasant sensations; it occurs at rest, particularly late in the day or at sleep time, and is temporarily relieved with movement. The negative impact on quality of life is profound and the disease is associated with a substantial economic burden. Dopamine agonists show efficacy which is, however, moderate, and many patients do not experience full remission. Tolerance, paradoxical aggravation of RLS symptoms (dopamine-induced augmentation) and impulse control disorders are frequently seen in patients with RLS on dopamine agonists. Therefore, although medications are available, many patients either experience side effects or show treatment response fluctuations with periods of symptoms' remission/alleviation or exacerbation. Whether RLS symptom fluctuation is related to the natural history of the disease (independent of appropriate medical treatment) is presently unknown. Furthermore, it is unknown if such fluctuation may be due to the impact of health-related behaviors in the context of daily life (e.g. physical activity, sleep quality, mood, alcohol consumption, smoking, or specific food intake), although this question warrants further research as any potential association would provide important opportunities for prevention and intervention strategies. For these reasons, the investigators aim to test the feasibility, validity and clinical utility of ambulatory monitoring techniques such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to document RLS symptoms severity and risk factors in daily life by collecting real-time data, and by using such information to reduce risk factor exposure and thus improve symptoms. Eligible participants will be given a study-dedicated smartphone to carry with them for a two-week period and will be equipped with wearable actigraph for the same period to monitor activity-rest cycle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Restless Legs Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Restless Legs Syndrome

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

RLS history, RLS treatments, and International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS) will be recorded

auto-questionnaires

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

To evaluate sleep quality, daytime somnolence and mood disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)).

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

4 electronic interviews administred per day during 14 days by a study-dedicated Android OS smartphone

activity-rest cycle

Intervention Type DEVICE

To further investigate the mutual influence of sleep quality on RLS symptoms and mood, the activity-rest cycle will be monitored by wearable actigraph to be placed on the non-dominant wrist during a period of 13 days and 14 nights.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical assessment

RLS history, RLS treatments, and International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLSRS) will be recorded

Intervention Type OTHER

auto-questionnaires

To evaluate sleep quality, daytime somnolence and mood disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

4 electronic interviews administred per day during 14 days by a study-dedicated Android OS smartphone

Intervention Type DEVICE

activity-rest cycle

To further investigate the mutual influence of sleep quality on RLS symptoms and mood, the activity-rest cycle will be monitored by wearable actigraph to be placed on the non-dominant wrist during a period of 13 days and 14 nights.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient over 18 years old and less than 70
* Any patient with a diagnosis of idiopathic RLS based on medical history and the presence of the 5 RLS diagnostic criteria
* Normal clinical examination
* Person affiliated or benefiting from a social security scheme
* Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and prior to any review required by the research).

Exclusion Criteria

* Any significant psychiatric illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, dementia, obsessive compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ...) or mood disorder
* History or presence of chronic pain other than that associated with RLS, history of epilepsy or serious head injury, history of peripheral neuropathy, diabetes
* Clinically significant sleep apnea, narcolepsy, or any secondary causes of RLS (e.g. chronic renal failure/hemodialysis, pregnancy)
* Other active clinically significant illness, including unstable cardiovascular, or neoplasic pathology which could interfere with the study conduct or interfere with study assessments or compromise the study participation
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Persons referred to in articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 (persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, minors, adults subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Imad Marc Antoine GHORAYEB, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Gwénaëlle CATHELINE, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Université de Bordeaux - INCIA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Bordeaux - Neurophysiologie Clinique de l'Enfant et de l'Adulte

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Imad Marc Antoine GHORAYEB, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(0)5.56.79.55.13 ext. +33

Olivier BRANCHARD

Role: CONTACT

(0)5.57.82.06.97 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Imad Marc-Antoine GHORAYEB, MD, PhD

Role: primary

(0)5.56.79.55.13 ext. +33

Olivier BRANCHARD

Role: backup

(0)5.57.82.06.97 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX 2022/30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.