The Influence of Fatigue on Trunk Motor Control and Brain Activity

NCT ID: NCT03576391

Last Updated: 2023-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-15

Study Completion Date

2018-02-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims at examining the influence of both physically and cognitively induced fatigue on trunk motor control on the one hand and brain activity related to movement preparation on the other hand, in healthy adult subjects. Furthermore, a comparison between the effects of both types of fatigue will be made. For this purpose a motor control task will be performed and compared before and after 3 specific interventions: i.e. a control intervention, a physical task and a cognitive task. Muscle and brain activity will be measured during each motor control task.

It is hypothesised that motor control will not be altered after a control task, i.e. seated rest for 45 minutes. With regards to the physical fatigue condition, it is expected that trunk muscles will contract earlier after this task than before due to altered motor control. Cognitive fatigue is hypothesised to have similar underlying processes as physical fatigue, thus a similar earlier muscle contraction is also expected after cognitive fatigue.

Lastly, as both types of fatigue are expected to induce a similar effect on motor control no significant differences between cognitive and physical fatigue are hypothesised. However, it is possible that the magnitude of this effect differs between types of fatigue, i.e. that 1 of both types has a bigger effect on motor control than the other.

With regards to brain activity in preparation of a motor control task similar hypotheses are formulated: no effect of the control task on brain activity, earlier and possibly increased brain activity after both fatiguing tasks, and no differences between both types of fatigue besides a possible difference in magnitude of effect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

September 2016 - January 2017. 16 healthy, adult male and female participants aged 18-45 were tested for 3 conditions on 2 separate days, i.e. a control condition on test day 1; a physical and cognitive fatiguing condition in randomised order on test day 2.

2 blocks of 80 rapid arm movements (RAM1 and RAM2) with the dominant arm were performed per condition, while electroencephalography (EEG) of the brain and surface electromyography (sEMG) of the Internal Oblique/Transversus Abdominis, External Oblique, Multifidus and Iliocostalis Lumborum pars Thoracis muscles were measured bilaterally. sEMG of the Anterior Deltoid muscle of the dominant arm was also measured. These RAM's were used to induce an internal perturbation to the postural balance of subjects and is an often used task in the study of trunk motor control. In between 2 blocks of the RAM the condition-specific interventions were given. The control condition consisted of RAM1 - 45 minute rest - RAM2; the physical fatigue condition consisted of RAM1 - 45 minute physical fatigue task - RAM2; the cognitive fatigue condition consisted of RAM1 - 45 minute cognitive fatigue task - RAM2.

The physical fatiguing task was a static endurance task for the paravertebral muscles, i.e. modified Biering-Sörensen task, followed by a static endurance task for the abdominal muscles, i.e. a static abdominal curl in 45° of trunk flexion while seated.

The cognitive fatiguing task was a modified incongruent Stroop color-word task for 45 minutes.

At the beginning of each test day several questionnaires were also administered to control for fatigue and physical activity, i.e. Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), Profile Of Mood States (POMS) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

January - February 2018. an additional 6 subjects were tested in order to increase the sample size of this study.

Statistical analysis will be performed to assess whether and to what extent both physical and cognitive fatigue might influence motor control as measured with EMG during RAM. Furthermore, the effect of both types of fatigue on cortical movement preparation will also be assessed based on the EEG measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Muscle Fatigue Mental Fatigue Event-related Potentials

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Sensorimotor control Feedforward Physical Fatigue Cognitive Fatigue Event-related potentials

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Each participant will perform all 3 experimental conditions spread out over 2 test days. At test day 1 the control condition is performed. Test day 2 follows at least 5 days after the 1st one in order to make sure participants are physically and mentally recovered as the protocol at test day 1 might induce some physical or mental fatigue. On test day 2 the other 2 conditions are tested in a randomised order: either first the physical fatigue condition, followed by the cognitive fatigue condition or vice versa.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The researcher that will perform the EMG-analysis, i.e. onset determination of the various muscles that were measured, will be blinded for participant, condition and muscle during that process.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control condition

Control condition to assess whether the repetition of a RAM task without fatiguing task in between 2 repetitions affects trunk motor control and cortical movement preparation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

45 minute rest while seated. Watching an animated movie, sleeping was not allowed.

Rapid Arm Movements

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 blocks of 80 trials of RAM in either a forward (n = 40) or backward (n = 40) shoulder flexion direction and back to neutral as fast as possible, with maintaining extension in the elbow. Visual cues (arrows) indicated the movement direction.

Physical Fatigue condition

Fatigue condition to assess whether a physical fatiguing task in between 2 RAM tasks affects trunk motor control and cortical movement preparation for the 2nd RAM.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rapid Arm Movements

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 blocks of 80 trials of RAM in either a forward (n = 40) or backward (n = 40) shoulder flexion direction and back to neutral as fast as possible, with maintaining extension in the elbow. Visual cues (arrows) indicated the movement direction.

Physical fatigue condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

40 minutes rest while seated followed by static endurance tasks, i.e. modified Biering-Sörensen task and static abdominal curl task.

Cognitive Fatigue condition

Fatigue condition to assess whether a cognitive fatiguing task in between 2 RAM tasks affects trunk motor control and cortical movement preparation for the 2nd RAM.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rapid Arm Movements

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 blocks of 80 trials of RAM in either a forward (n = 40) or backward (n = 40) shoulder flexion direction and back to neutral as fast as possible, with maintaining extension in the elbow. Visual cues (arrows) indicated the movement direction.

Cognitive fatigue condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

45 minutes of a cognitively fatiguing condition consisting of a modified incongruent Stroop color-word task.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control condition

45 minute rest while seated. Watching an animated movie, sleeping was not allowed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Rapid Arm Movements

2 blocks of 80 trials of RAM in either a forward (n = 40) or backward (n = 40) shoulder flexion direction and back to neutral as fast as possible, with maintaining extension in the elbow. Visual cues (arrows) indicated the movement direction.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physical fatigue condition

40 minutes rest while seated followed by static endurance tasks, i.e. modified Biering-Sörensen task and static abdominal curl task.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Cognitive fatigue condition

45 minutes of a cognitively fatiguing condition consisting of a modified incongruent Stroop color-word task.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy adult subjects.

Exclusion Criteria

* People with a history of pain or current pain
* severe pathologies
* traumata
* cardiorespiratory disorders
* neurological disorders
* vestibular disorders
* endocrinologic disorders
* psychiatric and cognitive disorders
* colour blindness
* sleeping disorders
* psychological disorders or major depressions
* major surgery to the spine or upper limbs
* clinically relevant malalignments and deformities
* malignancies
* substance abuse of alcohol or drugs
* consumption of analgesics without prescription 24 hours or with prescription two weeks before testing
* use of psychotropic medication
* extreme physical activities two days before testing
* professional athletes
* pregnant women or women \< 1 year postnatally
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lieven Danneels, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vakgroep REVAKI (Ghent University - Ghent University Hospital)

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016/0951

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id