Oxygen Targets in Acute Heart Failure With Pulmonary Congestion

NCT ID: NCT05613218

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-01

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, blinded, multi-center, controlled trial will investigate the effect of a restrictive vs. liberal oxygenation-strategy in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure with pulmonary congestion.

Patients will be randomized 1:1 in the emergency department to either liberal or restrictive oxygenation after providing informed written consent.

1. Liberal oxygenation group = SpO2 target of 96%.
2. Restrictive oxygenation group = SpO2 target of 90%.

The allocation will be concealed through the use of an oxygen-delivery robot, termed O2MATIC. The study will include 122 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

One million hospitalizations occur each year with a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure in the USA, with comparable numbers in Europe. Most patients with acute heart failure are treated with supplemental oxygen during hospitalization and guidelines recommend initiation of oxygen therapy if SpO2 \<90% (class I, level C). However, no clinical trials of oxygen targets in humans with acute heart failure investigating clinically relevant endpoints have been performed.

Primary objective:

To investigate the effect of a restrictive vs. liberal oxygenation-strategy in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Hypothesis:

Restrictive oxygenation is associated with improved clinical outcome compared to liberal oxygenation.

Design: Investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, blinded, multi-center, controlled trial.

Intervention:

Patients will be randomized 1:1 in the emergency department to either liberal or restrictive oxygenation after providing informed written consent.

1. Liberal oxygenation group = SpO2 target of 96%.
2. Restrictive oxygenation group = SpO2 target of 90%.

Patients will have nasal cannula or oxygen mask placed as the usual care, and oxygen is titrated to the prespecified target range.

Consented patients will be randomly allocated to study groups via the automated web-based system within REDCap. The allocation will be concealed. Time at randomization will be considered as study time zero (T0). All patients will receive usual standard of care except for their oxygen-administration.

The intervention-phase will be 24 h, and hereafter oxygen therapy will be at the discretion of the treating physician.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Heart Failure Pulmonary Congestion Hypoxemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1:1 allocation
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Oxygen-delivery will be given through a robot, which adjusts oxygen-flow towards a given oxygen-saturation target. The robots monitor will be turned of during the intervention and will only alarm in case of clinically relevant hypoxemia.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liberal oxygenation group

SpO2 target of 96%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxygen

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will have nasal cannula or oxygen mask placed as the usual standard of care.

Patients will be screened and randomized in the emergency department to either liberal or restrictive oxygenation after providing informed written consent and oxygen is titrated to the prespecified target range using an automated feedback device (O2MATIC). Consented patients will be randomly allocated to study groups via the web-based system within REDCap. The allocation will be concealed. Time at randomization will be considered as study time zero (T0). All patients will receive usual standard of care except for their O2 management. The intervention will last for 24 h. After 24 h, patients will be switched over to usual care for oxygen therapy. If the treating physician thinks, that the patient need another oxygenation target and it is thought to be harmful to continue with the allocated target, the intervention-phase can be stopped prematurely.

Restrictive oxygenation group

SpO2 target of 90%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxygen

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will have nasal cannula or oxygen mask placed as the usual standard of care.

Patients will be screened and randomized in the emergency department to either liberal or restrictive oxygenation after providing informed written consent and oxygen is titrated to the prespecified target range using an automated feedback device (O2MATIC). Consented patients will be randomly allocated to study groups via the web-based system within REDCap. The allocation will be concealed. Time at randomization will be considered as study time zero (T0). All patients will receive usual standard of care except for their O2 management. The intervention will last for 24 h. After 24 h, patients will be switched over to usual care for oxygen therapy. If the treating physician thinks, that the patient need another oxygenation target and it is thought to be harmful to continue with the allocated target, the intervention-phase can be stopped prematurely.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oxygen

Patients will have nasal cannula or oxygen mask placed as the usual standard of care.

Patients will be screened and randomized in the emergency department to either liberal or restrictive oxygenation after providing informed written consent and oxygen is titrated to the prespecified target range using an automated feedback device (O2MATIC). Consented patients will be randomly allocated to study groups via the web-based system within REDCap. The allocation will be concealed. Time at randomization will be considered as study time zero (T0). All patients will receive usual standard of care except for their O2 management. The intervention will last for 24 h. After 24 h, patients will be switched over to usual care for oxygen therapy. If the treating physician thinks, that the patient need another oxygenation target and it is thought to be harmful to continue with the allocated target, the intervention-phase can be stopped prematurely.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Acute (within minutes to days) onset or worsening of subjective dyspnea
3. Oxygen saturation \<92% (on arterial blood gas) or need of oxygen
4. At least one of the following clinical or radiological signs of congestion:

1\. Pulmonary rales 2. Chest X-ray or CT with pulmonary congestion 3. Lung ultrasound with multiple B-lines

Exclusion Criteria

1. More than 4 hours from hospital admission to randomization
2. Suspected infection or sepsis
3. Known severe pulmonary disease
4. Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Johannes Grand

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jens Hove, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre Department of Cardiology

Johannes Grand, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre Department of Cardiology

Ida Taraldsen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre Department of Cardiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Amager-Hvidovre Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Johannes Grand, MD, Phd

Role: CONTACT

+4535453545

Ida Taraldsen, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jens Jakob Thune, MD, DMSc

Role: primary

Johannes Grand

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REDOX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19
NCT04425031 COMPLETED PHASE4