The Efficacy of Simulation Manikins in the Military Medics Training
NCT ID: NCT05612828
Last Updated: 2024-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-07
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conversational AI in Tactical Casualty Care: Baseline GPT-4o Improves Combat Medic Decision-Making
NCT06796036
Simulation Training as a Tool for Teamwork Improvement in Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Team
NCT00229411
The Comparison of the Two Simulators for ACLS Training
NCT05001659
High-Fidelity Simulation Training: A Mixed Method Study
NCT05630391
Simulation Training and Teamwork Concerning Intubation on the Icu
NCT04564105
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional training
Combat Life Savers trained by conventional combat medicine approach.
Conventional versus simulation manikin training
Two approaches to training Combat Life Savers will be employed and performance of participants will be evaluated.
Simulation manikin training
Training based on principles of simulation medicine.
Conventional versus simulation manikin training
Two approaches to training Combat Life Savers will be employed and performance of participants will be evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional versus simulation manikin training
Two approaches to training Combat Life Savers will be employed and performance of participants will be evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Military University Hospital, Prague
OTHER
Czech Technical University in Prague
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karel RoubĂk, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Czech Technical University in Prague
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Czech Technical University in Prague
Kladno, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McCarthy M. US military revamps combat medic training and care. Lancet. 2003 Feb 8;361(9356):494-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12494-4. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VentRes-2022-01-JP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.