Enamel Matrix Derivative for Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT ID: NCT05517798
Last Updated: 2022-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2024-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Dental implant is now a common treatment modality. However, the loss of bone volume may not allow the placement of dental implant in an optimal position and may subsequently jeopardize functional and aesthetic implant outcomes. Therefore, the use of bone replacement graft following tooth extraction, as part of a procedure termed alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), has increasingly becoming a common treatment protocol to optimize dental implant placement in the future.
A Cochrane review on ARP has demonstrated that there are no significant differences between the plethora of synthetic or biologically driven grafting materials used to minimize changes in width and height of the extraction sockets. Nevertheless, a regenerative agent, known as enamel matrix derivative (EMD), has gained more attention in regenerative therapy over the last 20 years. Several studies demonstrated its ability to enhance wound healing, induce new attachment and promote bone formation in recession and intrabony defects. Over the last two decades, EMD has been successfully used in the periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects. EMD has the potential to cause early vascularization and support early bone formation, hence, it can be considered as a potential regenerative agent for ARP when used with appropriate carrier material.
Moreover, the majority of studies showed that bone substitutes generally performed well in small or contained defects compared with non-grafted sites, but there is lack of information regarding the efficacy of different bone substitute materials in large defects. Short-term follow-up studies of three to six months have also dominated the literature when the main aim of the ARP is to develop a site that optimise long-term implant outcomes. Such aim requires evaluating the long-term performance of dental implants placed in preserved ridges and reporting patient outcomes in well-conducted randomized controlled trial.
The aim of the present clinical trial is to evaluate the adjunctive use of EMD in promoting the desired vascularization and bone fill in small and large defects following tooth extraction and report on the long-term implant and patient outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix
NCT06541236
Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
NCT07239193
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction.
NCT05505084
The Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Maxilla
NCT02952209
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using a Composite Graft Plug: Radiographic and Clinical Assessment
NCT06617221
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Control group (C): Xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) + resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland).
Test group (T): Xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) combined with EMD (Straumann Emdogain, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) + resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland). The minimally traumatic extraction of the tooth will include raising a full mucoperiosteal flap and sectioning the roots if required. This will allow visual assessment of the socket walls and thorough debridement of the extraction socket. A clinician not involved in the study will then open a sealed opaque envelope and ARP procedure will be carried out by placing either xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) alone or combined with EMD (Straumann Emdogain, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland). The xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland) will pre-wetted with blood or saliva prior to applying it to the socket. EMD (Straumann Emdogain, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) will then be placed into the socket. Xenograft will not be mized with EMD outside the oral cavity. In both groups, a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) will be trimmed and adapted to cover the socket. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.
After six months of healing, CBCT will be utilized in the assessment of the available bone volume and virtual implant treatment planning. A three-dimensional printed surgical stent will be fabricated to aid in implant placement. The implant site will then be prepared according to the surgical protocol outlined in the International Team for Implantology (ITI) consensus conference. This procedure will include raising a mucoperiosteal flap with slightly palatal crestal incision and sulcular incision extending to the adjacent teeth. The osteotomy will be prepared to place a chemically modified, sand-blasted and acid-etched dental implants. In the presence of peri-implant bone defect, simultaneous contour augmentation will be carried out. For all implant surgeries, two-stage protocol will be followed with a re-opening procedure after 12 weeks to place a healing abutment.
Prosthodontic Protocol The restorative phase will be carried out in a partial or complete digital workflow. Within 21-28 days of placing the healing abutment, the implant position will be captured using an intraoral optical scanner. Computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) will be utilizing the captured digital data to design a screw-retained crown, which will then be milled of monolithic lithium disilicate blanks and bonded to pre-fabricated titanium abutments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Xenograft + resorbable collagen membrane
Bone grafting material (bovine origin) + resorbable collagen membrane (porcine origin)
Alveolar ridge preservation
Alveolar ridge preservation is a method of decreasing bone resorption following tooth extraction and facilitating prosthetically-driven implant placement
Xenograft combined with EMD + resorbable collagen membrane
Bone grafting material (bovine origin) with enamel matrix derivative (porcine origin) + resorbable collagen membrane (porcine origin)
Alveolar ridge preservation
Alveolar ridge preservation is a method of decreasing bone resorption following tooth extraction and facilitating prosthetically-driven implant placement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Alveolar ridge preservation
Alveolar ridge preservation is a method of decreasing bone resorption following tooth extraction and facilitating prosthetically-driven implant placement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Require extraction of anterior or posterior single tooth due to caries, endodontic and prosthetic complications.
* The tooth that requires extraction is bordered by two teeth.
* Controlled oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤ 25% at baseline).
* Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments.
* Willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of acute periapical lesion.
* Bone metabolic disease and/or taking medications that affect bone metabolism.
* Long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications.
* History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* Severe bruxism or parafunctional habits.
* Large occlusal discrepancies.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Associate Professor Momen Atieh
Principal Investigator Associate Professor Momen Atieh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dubai Dental Hospital
Dubai, , United Arab Emirates
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MBRUMHS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.