Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites

NCT ID: NCT07239193

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-01

Study Completion Date

2026-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When a tooth is removed, the bone around it (called the alveolar ridge) naturally shrinks. This study compares two bone grafting materials to find out which one better preserves bone after molar extraction:

Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM): A material made from the patient's own extracted tooth, treated to remove minerals while keeping bone-forming proteins.

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM): A mixture of a standard bone substitute and platelet-rich plasma from the patient's blood.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Alveolar ridge resorption is a predictable biological process following tooth extraction, particularly in molar sites where the bone structure is more complex. Maintaining ridge volume is essential for optimal future implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation. Various grafting materials and biologic enhancers have been used to minimize post-extraction bone loss; however, cost, availability, and biocompatibility remain significant challenges, especially with xenograft and allograft materials.

This randomized clinical trial investigates and compares two autogenous and biologically enhanced approaches for alveolar ridge preservation following molar extraction. The first method utilizes Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) prepared from the patient's own extracted tooth. DDM provides a naturally derived scaffold rich in collagen and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), offering both osteoconductive and osteoinductive potential. The second method uses a Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM), a combination of a xenograft bone substitute mixed with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), which represents a widely used regenerative option in oral surgery.

The study is designed as a parallel-group, single-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. Eligible adult patients requiring extraction of non-restorable multi-rooted molars will be enrolled and allocated equally into two groups. Both groups will undergo atraumatic extraction followed by immediate socket grafting with either DDM+PRF or MPM+PRP.

Standardized postoperative care will be provided to all participants, and healing will be monitored both clinically and radiographically. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used to evaluate alveolar bone width, height, and density immediately after extraction and at 4 months postoperatively. Pain and soft-tissue healing will also be assessed using validated clinical indices.

The study's primary objective is to determine whether Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) provides superior preservation of alveolar ridge dimensions and bone quality compared to Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM) in molar extraction sites. The hypothesis tested is that there will be no significant difference between both materials regarding bone preservation and regeneration outcomes.

This trial is expected to provide evidence supporting the clinical viability of using recycled autogenous tooth material as a cost-effective and biocompatible alternative to commercially available xenografts, potentially expanding regenerative options for clinicians and improving access to affordable biologic grafting solutions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Socket Preservation Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio.

Group A will receive socket grafting with autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) mixed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), while Group B will receive Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM) composed of xenograft mixed with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). Each participant will receive only one type of intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Single-blind design - participants will not be informed which grafting material (DDM or MPM) was used in their treatment. The operating surgeons and data analysts will be aware of the allocation due to the nature of the procedures.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) + Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)

Participants in this group will receive socket grafting using Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) prepared from their own extracted tooth. The dentin is cleaned, ground into particles, demineralized using 0.6 N hydrochloric acid, rinsed with saline, and mixed with autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) before being placed into the extraction socket. The socket is then closed with resorbable sutures for healing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) + Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Autogenous dentin-derived grafting material is used as a bone substitute for alveolar ridge preservation following molar extraction. PRF, obtained from the patient's centrifuged blood, is mixed with DDM to enhance graft stability and promote healing.

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM)

Participants in this group will receive socket grafting using a Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM) composed of a commercially available xenograft mixed with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). The mixture forms a cohesive mineralized matrix that is placed into the extraction socket and stabilized with sutures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

A xenogenic bone substitute is mixed with autologous platelet-rich plasma to form a mineralized plasmatic matrix, which serves as a control graft for ridge preservation after molar extraction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM) + Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)

Autogenous dentin-derived grafting material is used as a bone substitute for alveolar ridge preservation following molar extraction. PRF, obtained from the patient's centrifuged blood, is mixed with DDM to enhance graft stability and promote healing.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM)

A xenogenic bone substitute is mixed with autologous platelet-rich plasma to form a mineralized plasmatic matrix, which serves as a control graft for ridge preservation after molar extraction.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Non-restorable tooth indicated for extraction Multi-rooted teeth Age group of 18 to 55 years Patients free from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing.

Exclusion Criteria

\- Pregnant females Active infection at extraction site Smokers Systemic conditions affecting healing (e.g. diabetes, medications as bisphosphonates...) Poor oral hygiene. Patient with systemic disease that may affect bone healing. o Uncooperative patient.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Suliman Ahmed Badr

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tarek Ibrahim ElGhareeb, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Salah Eldin ElAbbasy, Phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Ahmed Suliman Ahmed, Bds

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DDM in socket preservation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.