Socket Preservation Using Autogenous Bone Graft Versus MPM

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Studying the comparative effectiveness of socket preservation using autogenous bone graft versus MPM for implant insertion.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Socket Preservation Using Dentin Graft Autogenous Dentin Graft With Collagen Sponge on Dental Implant Stability AUTOGENOUS TOOTH GRAFT WITH COLLAGEN SPONGE ON DENTAL IMPLANT STABILITY

NCT06853392

Bone Loss Bone Remodeling Disorder Bone Resorption

COMPLETED PHASE3

Preimplant Site Augmentation Using MPM Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

NCT03007069

Bone Resorption

UNKNOWN NA

Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

NCT02998632

Bone Augmentation

UNKNOWN NA

Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

NCT03014388

Bone Resorption

UNKNOWN NA

Ridge Preservation In Mandibular Molars Using Mixture Of ABB And Autogenous Particulate VS Sticky Bone

NCT03584997

Alveolar Bone Loss Bone Graft Failure Alveolar Bone Resorption

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To assess bone quality, stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of mandibular anterior and premorals augmented by MPM (Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix) versus autogenous bone graft (gold standard), at different follow-up periods (0, 3, 6, 9 months).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Graft; Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix

MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix) insertion in extraction sockets for socket preservation for later implant placement and histomorphometric analysis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix).

Intervention Type OTHER

Preparation of sticky bone graft by addition of growth factors obtained from patient's vebous blood.

Autogenous Bone Graft (Gold Standards).

Socket preservation using Autogenous bone graft for later implant placement and histomorphometric analysis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Autogenous Bone Graft

Intervention Type OTHER

Socket preservation using autogenous bone graft for preservation of bone width and height for future implant insertion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MPM(Mineralized plasmatic matrix).

Preparation of sticky bone graft by addition of growth factors obtained from patient's vebous blood.

Intervention Type OTHER

Autogenous Bone Graft

Socket preservation using autogenous bone graft for preservation of bone width and height for future implant insertion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sticky bone graft. Gold Standards

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Medically free patients.
2. Patients with mandibular anterior and premolar hopeless teeth indicated for extraction.
3. Evaluated bone height on X.Ray to be (0-4 mm buccal bone dehiscence).
4. Age between 18 and 40 years.
5. Both sexes.
6. Patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative procedures. Good oral hygiene.
7. Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Smokers.
2. Pregnant or lactating females.
3. Presence of any pathosis in the pre-implant site.
4. Presence of Para functional habits.
5. History of oral radiotherapy.
6. History of prolonged steroids use
7. Psychological disorders.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes