Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix
NCT ID: NCT06541236
Last Updated: 2024-08-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-01
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
NCT07239193
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction
NCT06546826
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The recruitment of patients and their treatment was carried out within the framework of the University Clinic of A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of 67 from 2018 to 2020. Study type: randomized clinical intervention prospective longitudinal study. The study included 80 patients in need of extraction of tooth and further dental implantation following proposed inclusion criteria. After selection, complex oral rehabilitation was carried out to restore chewing function. All patients (n=80) were divided into 4 equal groups depending on the used preservative material. A total of 151 teeth were extracted. In the 1st group, the preservation was carried out using the Cerabone xenograft (Botiss, Germany). In the 2nd group, Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) was used, obtained from the patient's venous blood 20-30 minutes before the tooth extraction (BTI Endoret, Spain). The third group consisted of patients who underwent preservation of the extracted tooth socket with crushed autologous dentin matrix (ADM) obtained from their own tooth using Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio Inc., USA). In the 4th group, a material based on hydroxyapatite "Kollapan-L" with lincomycin (Intermedapatit, Russia) was used as a preservation graft.
4 months after tooth extraction, dental implants were installed according to the standard ITI protocol (Chen S., Buser D., 2007). In the postoperative period, a standard course of antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy was carried out.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Use of different bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation of the socket
All patients (n=80) were divided into 4 equal groups depending on the used preservative material. A total of 151 teeth were extracted. In the 1st group, the preservation was carried out using the Cerabone xenograft (Botiss, Germany). In the 2nd group, Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) was used, obtained from the patient's venous blood 20-30 minutes before the tooth extraction (BTI Endoret, Spain). The third group consisted of patients who underwent preservation of the extracted tooth socket with crushed autologous dentin matrix (ADM) obtained from their own tooth using Smart Dentin Grinder (KometaBio Inc., USA). In the 4th group, a material based on hydroxyapatite "Kollapan-L" with lincomycin (Intermedapatit, Russia) was used as a preservation graft
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix
Incorporation of various bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix
Incorporation of various bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge preservation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Nikolay Redko
Department of maxillo-facial and plastic sutgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Moscow State Univerciry of medicine and dentistry
Moscow, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Natella Krichelli, PhD, DDS, Professor
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Autologous Dentin Matrix (CMF)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.