Deriving Cardiac Reference Ranges at 3.0Tesla in Healthy Volunteers
NCT ID: NCT05241184
Last Updated: 2022-02-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-10
2022-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accelerated Stress CMR in Coronary Artery Disease
NCT05221762
Normal Reference Values for 3T Cardiac Parametric Mapping
NCT06784427
Non-contrast Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Normal Values and Imaging Protocols
NCT01728597
Cardiac MR (CMR) in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-responders
NCT01367691
Inter-field Strength Agreement of CMR Derived Strain
NCT04475627
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
T1 reference values vary according to the magnetic field strength of the MRI scanner. T1 and T2 times (ms) are expectedly higher at 3.0T compared to 1.5T, in line with results obtained when working with the Siemens VERIO scanner based at the BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre \[17\]. T2 values for 3.0T are, generally, not so well described and are known to vary between different manufacturers and systems.
A consensus statement by Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) states that "Reference ranges should be generated from data sets that were acquired, processed, and analyzed in the same way as the intended application, with the upper and lower range of normal defined by the mean plus and minus 2 standard deviations of the normal data, respectively."\[16\] Myocardial blood flow measurements for both stress and rest are also distinct for individual scanners, especially at 3.0T. In fact, a number of centres have derived site specific and magnet specific reference ranges from healthy volunteers including 1)Stockholm, Sweden, 1.5T Siemens Avanto, 3.4 ± 0.7 ml/min/g \[18\] 2) Barts (London, UK) 3.0T Siemens Prisma, 3.00 +/-0.76 ml/g/min (unpublished data) and 3) Leeds, UK: 3.0T Siemens Prisma 2.89 ± 0.56 ml/g/min \[19\], 1.5T Philips Intera, 4.50 ± 0.91 ml/min/g\[20\] and studies are ongoing in sites such as Oxford (https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/research/patients/trials/stress-mri.aspx) . As can be seen, there is a wide spread of values and local reference ranges are urgently required (defined as stress MBF \<2 standard deviations from the mean in healthy volunteers). These measurements are not yet available for the 3.0T Prisma scanner at the Institute of Clinical Excellence (ICE), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH). These values are essential to identify what is abnormal for people living in the west of Scotland.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multiparametric stress CMR protocol
Multiparametric stress CMR protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Capacity to provide written informed consent
* Able to comply with study procedures
* eGFR \>45ml/min
* Vaccination status against SARS CoV-19 is not an exclusion criterion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contra-indication to intravenous adenosine, i.e. severe asthma; long QT syndrome; second- or third-degree AV block and sick sinus syndrome.
* Lack of informed consent.
* Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or of child-bearing potential (WoCBP) without a negative pregnancy test
* History of cardiovascular illness.
* Previous COVID-19 illness
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
University of Glasgow
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kenneth Mangion
Clinical Lecturer in Cardiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GN20CA408
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.