Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease-2

NCT ID: NCT01664858

Last Updated: 2018-11-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

CE-MARC 2 is a randomised controlled trial to determine diagnosis and patient management in patients presenting to outpatient clinics with suspected stable angina. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (at 3Tesla) will be evaluated prospectively against current best clinical practice (defined by international guidelines). The study hypothesis is that 3Tesla CMR-guided management of patients with suspected stable angina is superior to current clinical practice based on 1) the principles of the National Institutes for Clinical Excellence (NICE) CG95 guidelines (2010); 2) SPECT AHA appropriateness criteria, in terms of avoiding study-defined unnecessary invasive coronary angiography.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a randomized controlled trial of non-invasive imaging to determine diagnosis and management of patients presenting with suspected stable angina. Despite the widespread availability of non-invasive imaging and guideline-enshrined use of optimal medical therapy (OMT), patients with suspected coronary heart disease (CHD) often end up having invasive coronary angiography early in their disease course. Currently \>50% of elective invasive coronary angiograms performed in the UK and US do not lead on to a revascularisation procedure (data from 2008-09 UK Hospital Episode Statistics; American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (Patel MR, et al., N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-95)). The UK NICE guidelines for the management of chest pain of recent onset (CG95; 2010) could increase this proportion even further. This is inefficient for patients and also of healthcare resources.

More widespread use of non-invasive functional imaging could reduce the rates of unnecessary angiography. We have shown in the CE-MARC study (Lancet 2012) that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5Tesla has a higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of CHD than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). CE-MARC 2 will be a three-way randomised controlled trial of patient management in 1200 patients with known or suspected CHD, comparing 3Tesla CMR to SPECT-guided care or NICE guidelines-based management. The primary endpoint will be the reduction of unnecessary invasive angiography (defined by invasive FFR) at 12 months - identified by our expert patients as an important 'patient focused' clinical outcome measure. The secondary objectives will include: 1) assessment of safety of a CMR-guided management strategy 2) cost effectiveness analysis of these strategies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3T CMR-guided management

Patient to be managed according to the results of 3T CMR imaging

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

3T CMR

Intervention Type OTHER

3Tesla Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

X-Ray coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

X-Ray coronary angiography

SPECT-guided management

Patients to be managed according to the results of SPECT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SPECT

Intervention Type OTHER

SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

X-Ray coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

X-Ray coronary angiography

NICE-guidelines based management

Patients will be receive NICE-guidelines based management and will receive the imaging strategy specified by NICE according to their pre-test likelihood of having CHD.

10-29% - CT calcium score +/- CT coronary angiography; 30-60% - SPECT; 61-90% - X-Ray coronary angiography

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SPECT

Intervention Type OTHER

SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

CT calcium score

Intervention Type OTHER

CT calcium score

CT coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

CT coronary angiography

X-Ray coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

X-Ray coronary angiography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3T CMR

3Tesla Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Type OTHER

SPECT

SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Intervention Type OTHER

CT calcium score

CT calcium score

Intervention Type OTHER

CT coronary angiography

CT coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

X-Ray coronary angiography

X-Ray coronary angiography

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient ≥30yrs
* Patient has suspected stable angina (CHD) that requires further investigation
* Has a defined risk of 10-90% (according to NICE guidelines CG95; 2010)
* Suitable for revascularisation if required
* Given informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-anginal chest pain
* Clinically unstable
* Previous MI or biomarker positive ACS
* Previous revascularisation with coronary artery bypass surgery or PCI
* Contraindication to CMR imaging (pacemaker, intra-orbital debris, intra-auricular implants, intracranial clips, severe claustrophobia)
* Contraindication to adenosine infusion (regular adenosine antagonist medication, significant reversible airways disease, second or third degree atrio-ventricular heart block, sino-atrial disease)
* Known adverse reaction to Adenosine or Gadolinium contrast agent
* Obesity (where body girth exceeds scanner diameter)
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Inability to give informed consent
* Known chronic renal failure (eGFR \<30mL/min/1.73m2)
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leicester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Glasgow

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

British Heart Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor JP Greenwood

Professor of Cardiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John P Greenwood, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Leeds

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glenfield Hospital

Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Bristol NHS FT

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ripley DP, Brown JM, Everett CC, Bijsterveld P, Walker S, Sculpher M, McCann GP, Berry C, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2015 Jan;169(1):17-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25497243 (View on PubMed)

Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Dall'Armellina E, Prasad A, Bijsterveld P, Foley JR, Mangion K, Sculpher M, Walker S, Everett CC, Cairns DA, Sharples LD, Brown JM; CE-MARC 2 Investigators. Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1051-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12680.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27570866 (View on PubMed)

Everett CC, Berry C, McCann GP, Fernandez C, Reynolds C, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Dall'Armellina E, Prasad A, Foley JR, Mangion K, Bijsterveld P, Brown J, Stocken D, Walker S, Sculpher M, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Randomised trial of stable chest pain investigation: 3-year clinical and quality of life results from CE-MARC 2. Open Heart. 2023 May;10(1):e002221. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002221.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37130657 (View on PubMed)

Corcoran D, Young R, Adlam D, McConnachie A, Mangion K, Ripley D, Cairns D, Brown J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Baumbach A, Kharbanda R, Oldroyd KG, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Berry C. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The CE-MARC 2 coronary physiology sub-study. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;266:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.061. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29716756 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SP/12/1/29062

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

FAMOUS-NSTEMI MRI Sub-Study
NCT02073422 COMPLETED
Accelerated Stress CMR in Coronary Artery Disease
NCT05221762 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Biomarkers and Cardiac CT
NCT02381301 RECRUITING