Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease-2
NCT ID: NCT01664858
Last Updated: 2018-11-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1202 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0-T: A Multicenter Trial
NCT01024478
Non-contrast Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Normal Values and Imaging Protocols
NCT01728597
Deriving Cardiac Reference Ranges at 3.0Tesla in Healthy Volunteers
NCT05241184
Using Cardiac MRI to Predict Outcomes in Patients With STEMI
NCT07072858
Intracoronary Thrombus Detection by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT02776657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
More widespread use of non-invasive functional imaging could reduce the rates of unnecessary angiography. We have shown in the CE-MARC study (Lancet 2012) that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5Tesla has a higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of CHD than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). CE-MARC 2 will be a three-way randomised controlled trial of patient management in 1200 patients with known or suspected CHD, comparing 3Tesla CMR to SPECT-guided care or NICE guidelines-based management. The primary endpoint will be the reduction of unnecessary invasive angiography (defined by invasive FFR) at 12 months - identified by our expert patients as an important 'patient focused' clinical outcome measure. The secondary objectives will include: 1) assessment of safety of a CMR-guided management strategy 2) cost effectiveness analysis of these strategies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3T CMR-guided management
Patient to be managed according to the results of 3T CMR imaging
3T CMR
3Tesla Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
X-Ray coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
SPECT-guided management
Patients to be managed according to the results of SPECT
SPECT
SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
X-Ray coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
NICE-guidelines based management
Patients will be receive NICE-guidelines based management and will receive the imaging strategy specified by NICE according to their pre-test likelihood of having CHD.
10-29% - CT calcium score +/- CT coronary angiography; 30-60% - SPECT; 61-90% - X-Ray coronary angiography
SPECT
SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
CT calcium score
CT calcium score
CT coronary angiography
CT coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3T CMR
3Tesla Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
SPECT
SPECT: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
CT calcium score
CT calcium score
CT coronary angiography
CT coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
X-Ray coronary angiography
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has suspected stable angina (CHD) that requires further investigation
* Has a defined risk of 10-90% (according to NICE guidelines CG95; 2010)
* Suitable for revascularisation if required
* Given informed written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically unstable
* Previous MI or biomarker positive ACS
* Previous revascularisation with coronary artery bypass surgery or PCI
* Contraindication to CMR imaging (pacemaker, intra-orbital debris, intra-auricular implants, intracranial clips, severe claustrophobia)
* Contraindication to adenosine infusion (regular adenosine antagonist medication, significant reversible airways disease, second or third degree atrio-ventricular heart block, sino-atrial disease)
* Known adverse reaction to Adenosine or Gadolinium contrast agent
* Obesity (where body girth exceeds scanner diameter)
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Inability to give informed consent
* Known chronic renal failure (eGFR \<30mL/min/1.73m2)
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leicester
OTHER
University of Glasgow
OTHER
British Heart Foundation
OTHER
University of Leeds
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor JP Greenwood
Professor of Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John P Greenwood, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Leeds
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
University Hospitals Bristol NHS FT
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ripley DP, Brown JM, Everett CC, Bijsterveld P, Walker S, Sculpher M, McCann GP, Berry C, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2015 Jan;169(1):17-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Dall'Armellina E, Prasad A, Bijsterveld P, Foley JR, Mangion K, Sculpher M, Walker S, Everett CC, Cairns DA, Sharples LD, Brown JM; CE-MARC 2 Investigators. Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1051-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12680.
Everett CC, Berry C, McCann GP, Fernandez C, Reynolds C, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Dall'Armellina E, Prasad A, Foley JR, Mangion K, Bijsterveld P, Brown J, Stocken D, Walker S, Sculpher M, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Randomised trial of stable chest pain investigation: 3-year clinical and quality of life results from CE-MARC 2. Open Heart. 2023 May;10(1):e002221. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002221.
Corcoran D, Young R, Adlam D, McConnachie A, Mangion K, Ripley D, Cairns D, Brown J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Baumbach A, Kharbanda R, Oldroyd KG, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Berry C. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The CE-MARC 2 coronary physiology sub-study. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;266:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.061. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SP/12/1/29062
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.