Intensity of Physical Activity Level During Daily Living: Unravelling Its Relationship With Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders and Evaluating Underlying Facilitators and Barriers, An Exploratory Survey Study
NCT ID: NCT05234034
Last Updated: 2022-02-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-15
2024-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of this study is to get insight on the impact of the intensity of the physical activity level on pain and disability in persons with CMDs. Second, the underlying facilitators and barriers to perform physical activity (at different intensities) during daily living will be evaluated. Third, the impact of the intensity of the physical activity level on the motivation to perform a rehabilitation program will be evaluated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identification of Factors Associated With Physical Activity Levels in Adult Muscle Diseases
NCT03030547
Subjective and Objective Changes in Muscle-stiffness
NCT05279339
Kettlebell Swings and Paraspinal Muscle Function
NCT06069271
Individual Response to Different Volumes of Resistance Training
NCT02179307
Examination of Musculoskeletal System Problems and Affecting Factors in CrossFit Sports
NCT05682534
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A key public health intervention recommended for improving health related outcomes of nearly all chronic disorders is physical activity. High level evidence showing beneficial effects of physical activity is also available for multiple CMDs including chronic low back pain, neck pain, and fibromyalgia. Hereby, increased levels of physical activity have been found to improve outcomes such as pain intensity, functional disability, quality of life, mortality risk, and working ability. However, dose-response relationships between physical activity and these therapeutic outcomes are still poorly understood. While an inverse association between low physical activity and increased prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders seems to exist, results of therapeutic programs aimed at increasing physical activity remain contradictory when it comes to improving pain and disability specifically (which might be seen as primary therapy success outcomes for this population). Therefore, to date it has not been possible to formulate general recommendations on optimal therapeutic quantity of physical activity and how activities of daily life should be designed for specific CMD patient populations. Also, although physical activity has clear advantages, it seems difficult to effectively improve physical activity levels of persons with CMDs. A complexity of possible facilitators (e.g. "improved health state", "social support", and "facilitating cognitions, emotions, and behavior") and barriers (e.g. "time restrictions", "social barriers", "maladaptive cognitions, emotions and behavior", and "access to exercise opportunities") has been stated. To accommodate these facilitators and barriers, therapy programs should be sufficiently adapted to the specific needs of the participant.
Exercise therapy is consistently advocated as a primary treatment approach to further support increasing physical activity. However, overall therapy effects also remain low for this training modality. With regard to better adapting this treatment strategy, it has been suggested that the currently applied low to moderate exercise intensities in rehabilitation could be below the required level and that this might attenuate therapy outcomes. Moreover, if persons with CMDs already perform physical activity at a high intensity during their daily living, they might not be motivated to follow low or moderate intensity programs. Besides, setting up a high intensity training (HIT) program can be very valuable to increase therapy success, as HIT programs have already been found to improve outcomes more than comparable programs at moderate intensity in certain MSDs such as chronic low back pain and spondyloarthritis. Nonetheless, on the other hand, persons with other specific types of CMDs, or with a low activity level, might not feel the urge, have the self-confidence, or be deterred to start and persevere in a rehab program with these characteristics.
The primary objective of this study is to get insight on the impact of the intensity of the physical activity level on pain and disability in persons with CMDs. Second, the underlying facilitators and barriers to perform physical activity (at different intensities) during daily living will be evaluated. Third, the impact of the intensity of the physical activity level on the motivation to perform a rehabilitation program will be evaluated.
Primary research question and hypothesis Question 1: to which extent does the intensity level of physical activity during daily living explain variance in outcomes related to pain and functional disability in persons with CMDs?
• Hypothesis 1: Higher pain and higher disability levels are seen in persons with CMDs with lower intensity physical activity levels during daily living.
Secondary research questions and hypotheses Question 2: to which extent are outcomes with regard to psychological factors related to the intensity level of physical activity during daily living in persons with CMDs? • Hypothesis 2: psychological factors have a significant relationship to the activity level of persons with CMDs.
Question 3: Which are the facilitators and barriers for having a moderate or vigorous intensity during daily life physical activity in persons with CMDs?
• Hypothesis 3: Specific facilitators and barriers can be summarized with regard to having a moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity level in persons with CMDs.
Question 4: To which extent does a relationship exist between pain, functional disability, and mediating psychological factors on the one hand and facilitators and barriers for having a moderate or vigorous intensity level of physical during daily living on the other hand in persons with CMDs? • Hypothesis 4: pain, functional disability, and mediating patient characteristics are related to specific facilitators and barriers for a moderate or vigorous intensity level of physical activity during daily living in persons with CMDs.
Question 5: To which extent does the intensity level of physical activity level during daily living relate to motivation to start an exercise therapy program at high intensity?
• Hypothesis 5: Persons with CMDs with a high level of physical activity during daily living will showcase higher motivation to start a therapy program at high intensity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
chronic low back pain (LBP)
persons with chronic low back pain (LBP) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
chronic neck pain (CNP)
persons with chronic neck pain (CNP) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
chronic shoulder pain (CSP)
persons with chronic shoulder pain (CSP) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
osteoarthritis (OA)
persons with osteoarthritis (OA) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
fibromyalgia (FM)
persons with fibromyalgia (FM) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
chronic Temporomandibular Disorder (CTMD)
persons with chronic temporomandibular disorder (CTMD) will be included in this arm.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
online survey
participantion consists of filling in an online survey that will take approximately 53 minutes. An adapted battery of questionnaires is provided for each subgroup.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A medical diagnosis of one of the following musculoskeletal disorders: chronic low back pain (LBP); chronic neck pain (NP); chronic shoulder pain (CSP); osteoarthritis (OA); chronic Temporomandibular Disorder (CTMD); fibromyalgia (FM).
* Chronic pain, defined as: pain that persists or recurs for longer than three months (fluctuations in the severity of the pain during this period are allowed)
* Ability to read and understand the English or Dutch language.
Exclusion Criteria
* Comorbidities: paresis and sensory disturbances with a neurological cause in the lower extremities, diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disorders, and all other non-musculoskeletal disorders that can produce pain and affect the physical activity level or physical functioning.
* Pregnancy or trying to get pregnant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hasselt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Annick Timmermans
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Annick Timmermans
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasselt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hasselt University
Diepenbeek, België, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B1152021000021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.